Manager Call 2018-02-21: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 7: Line 7:




==Agenda for GOC meeting and SAB meeting==
==Agenda for GOC meeting and SAB meeting===
 
 
==Annotation transfer across species==
https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1807
 
Can we come up with a plan for annotation propagation across species moving forward? We have 3 main pipelines at the moment, PAINT, interpro2go, Ensembl (plus various groups may be using their own). Are all using the same rules? Are these clear? Do we need extra rules for blocking certain branches across certain levels? Are we all implementing the do-not-annotate subsets consistently? Do these need expanded, better strategy for response-to terms?
- Chris
 
---
For example, in addition to PAINT, MGI brings in rat and human
experimental annotations via ISO using MGI orthology assertions.
 
We do not use InterPro2GO for cross-species annotations.
 
The task first is, as you say, to gather status of major groups in this
regard.  This comes under AGR thinking too.
 
- Judy
 
 


= Minutes =  
= Minutes =  
*On call:
*On call:

Revision as of 04:13, 15 February 2018


Call in info

https://stanford.zoom.us/j/754529609

Agenda

Agenda for GOC meeting and SAB meeting=

Annotation transfer across species

https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1807

Can we come up with a plan for annotation propagation across species moving forward? We have 3 main pipelines at the moment, PAINT, interpro2go, Ensembl (plus various groups may be using their own). Are all using the same rules? Are these clear? Do we need extra rules for blocking certain branches across certain levels? Are we all implementing the do-not-annotate subsets consistently? Do these need expanded, better strategy for response-to terms? - Chris

--- For example, in addition to PAINT, MGI brings in rat and human experimental annotations via ISO using MGI orthology assertions.

We do not use InterPro2GO for cross-species annotations.

The task first is, as you say, to gather status of major groups in this regard. This comes under AGR thinking too.

- Judy


Minutes

  • On call: