Manager Call 2019-02-13: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
(→Agenda) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Agenda = | = Agenda = | ||
Present: | Present:Judy, David, PaulT, Seth, Laurent-Philippe, Kimberly, Huaiyu | ||
== General topics == | == General topics == |
Revision as of 12:03, 13 February 2019
Agenda
Present:Judy, David, PaulT, Seth, Laurent-Philippe, Kimberly, Huaiyu
General topics
- How to manage "unmanaged" external2go mappings?
- Getting rid of legacy SVN use
- metadata/datasets/*.yaml
- external2go
- others?
References
- Proposed new GPAD specs allow for only one ID per reference (PMID)
- This has implications for what is listed, and available for linkout, in AmiGO
- Do we need to re-visit this decision?
Meeting Reports
- ???
Upcoming Meetings
- ???
Other project Reports
Annotation Call
Curating Preprints in bioRxiv
- Good discussion on the pros/cons of curating preprints, especially those found in bioRxiv
- Although most groups would not choose to do this right now, we concluded that if a curator feels strongly that there is valuable information in a bioRxiv preprint, they may curate that paper
- Proposed SOP (to be presented on manager's call for final approval):
- Curator should determine that the preprint is the only published source of the data and that the data is of high quality
- GO annotations can be made as usual, citing the unique accession of the preprint
- If and when the preprint appears as a peer-reviewed publication, the curator needs to review the paper again, perhaps in collaboration with the authors, to make certain that the annotations are still correct
- Existing and/or new annotations from the paper will then be updated to cite the accession for the peer-reviewed paper
Minutes
- ???