Difference between revisions of "Manager Call 2019-02-27"
From GO Wiki
(→Agenda) |
(→Minutes) |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
[[Category:GO Managers Meetings ]] | [[Category:GO Managers Meetings ]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | *GPAD/GPI spec | ||
| + | ** Need to be finished by the Cambridge meeting | ||
| + | ** Pascale emphasizes that it should be a public facing document that users are able to see. | ||
| + | ** David reminds everyone that there should be only one spec instead of multiple working versions to avoid confusion. | ||
| + | ** Need a call to review the spec before the Cambridge meeting, and make final decisions. It can be at the annotation call. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Moving no-GO-CAM annotations to GO Central | ||
| + | ** Dustin wrote a script to do so. | ||
| + | ** Biggest issue is to handle annotation extensions - need to write generalized rules. | ||
| + | ** Reviewed the level of efforts for everyone involved in the project. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * GO data release pipline | ||
| + | ** Project owner question. The current owner is Pascale, but Seth originally thought he was the owner. Need to clarify. | ||
| + | ** Reviewed github tickets. | ||
| + | ** Most of the discussions were side-tracked to the SynGO import. | ||
Revision as of 14:59, 27 February 2019
Contents
Agenda
Present: Chris, David, Huaiyu, Kimberly, Pascale, Seth, Suzi, Judy, Paul T, Laurent-Philippe
Discussion points
Management
- Update on all ongoing projects: https://github.com/orgs/geneontology/projects
- We need % effort from the different people involved in project for all projects with a delivery date/active projects
- Should we create projects for (1) Proposed new Noctua widget (2) GPAD/GPI specs (3) Documentation (reopen?)
- GPAD/GPI specs is already a github project
- 'Gantt-chart' to manage projects: Hackathon tasks: how is that working ?
GPAD/GPI Specs
- SO vs MSO - stick with SO for now?
Cambridge meeting: Review action items from Montreal
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QiqfZ5eAwmljqt5Fh0Ooi1Pd-HKgMSGsYC_wx6-UEPY/edit#
New IEAs (not InterPro2GO)
https://github.com/geneontology/helpdesk/issues/195
We decided earlier to not accept IEAs from outside groups, as all sequences would be run through the dependable InterPro2GO after uploading- but this group/method *seems* like they have more accurate annotations and higher
coverage.
GOC meeting action items
In Cambridge Agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QiqfZ5eAwmljqt5Fh0Ooi1Pd-HKgMSGsYC_wx6-UEPY/edit#
Priorities:
- Moving existing annotations to GO-CAM
From last meeting minutes (by far not exhaustive)
- Create working group to coordinate integration of IEAs (single source ideally): priority?
- Handling redundant information: priority?
Minutes
- GPAD/GPI spec
- Need to be finished by the Cambridge meeting
- Pascale emphasizes that it should be a public facing document that users are able to see.
- David reminds everyone that there should be only one spec instead of multiple working versions to avoid confusion.
- Need a call to review the spec before the Cambridge meeting, and make final decisions. It can be at the annotation call.
- Moving no-GO-CAM annotations to GO Central
- Dustin wrote a script to do so.
- Biggest issue is to handle annotation extensions - need to write generalized rules.
- Reviewed the level of efforts for everyone involved in the project.
- GO data release pipline
- Project owner question. The current owner is Pascale, but Seth originally thought he was the owner. Need to clarify.
- Reviewed github tickets.
- Most of the discussions were side-tracked to the SynGO import.
