Manager Call 2019-08-21: Difference between revisions
m (→GO stats) |
(→Agenda) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* Next: start announcing | * Next: start announcing | ||
== GO Meeting general == | |||
* Get your people to sign up | |||
* Get your people to pay (used for badges, etc.--the true reg) | |||
* There is only "Yes" and "No", there is no "Maybe" | |||
==Pipeline progress== | ==Pipeline progress== | ||
* release process started | |||
== Project for improving mappings? == | |||
...[L]et's discuss whether we should initiate a project for improving the mappings: documentation, workflow processes, quality control, staying up to date. | |||
We are of course doing a good job in specific instances, whether it is ones we bring in (interpro/reactom) or ones we maintain (e.g rhea), but this project would be about a broader approach. | |||
==Cross references on GO website/AmiGO page== | ==Cross references on GO website/AmiGO page== | ||
Line 16: | Line 28: | ||
* Seth was to create documentation describing how that page is generated; where is that ? | * Seth was to create documentation describing how that page is generated; where is that ? | ||
==Collaborators Webpage | ==Collaborators Webpage== | ||
We need to decide who we put as collaborators and as contributing groups. There is some redundancy. | We need to decide who we put as collaborators and as contributing groups. There is some redundancy. | ||
https://github.com/geneontology/geneontology.github.io/issues/130 | https://github.com/geneontology/geneontology.github.io/issues/130 |
Revision as of 16:03, 19 August 2019
Agenda
- Agenda: Seth
- Minutes: Pascale
GO users meeting Berkeley 2019
- TODO: Finalize decision on topics/speakers/target audience.
Preliminary agenda is here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YBCEeSl1MKPvtRNAMGBGcOZqdZl3wlbwWC1nuDnccqE/edit
- Next: start announcing
GO Meeting general
- Get your people to sign up
- Get your people to pay (used for badges, etc.--the true reg)
- There is only "Yes" and "No", there is no "Maybe"
Pipeline progress
- release process started
Project for improving mappings?
...[L]et's discuss whether we should initiate a project for improving the mappings: documentation, workflow processes, quality control, staying up to date.
We are of course doing a good job in specific instances, whether it is ones we bring in (interpro/reactom) or ones we maintain (e.g rhea), but this project would be about a broader approach.
Cross references on GO website/AmiGO page
- Follow up on https://github.com/geneontology/amigo/issues/578
- Seth was to create documentation describing how that page is generated; where is that ?
Collaborators Webpage
We need to decide who we put as collaborators and as contributing groups. There is some redundancy. https://github.com/geneontology/geneontology.github.io/issues/130
GO stats
Status, remaining work and decision on computing or not the stats for previous releases original issue and recent issue
Notes on zenodo archives and solr 3.6.