Manager Call 2020-02-26

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Agenda

  • Agenda: Pascale
  • Minutes: Laurent-Philippe
  • Present:
  • Regrets:

Discussion points

Caltech f2f, 24-28 Feb

Update /questions ?


GO meeting Paris, 11 (Users), 12-14 (Main), 15(SAB) May

GO meeting Baltimore, week of 5th Oct

Discussion

Noctua/NEO

  • Loading UniProt Viral + bacterial GPI: This came up again from the multi-organism working group. They want to start making GO-CAM models. Can the loading of the GPI file be prioritized and assigned?

Ontology - questions for managers/PIs

  • Comments: what type of comments should we show users:
    • Editors’ comment: with links to the GH ticket
    • Term contributor + special projects: GOC:curators; GOC:pg GOC:add,

as well as GO_REF:0000022, GOC:mtg_15nov05, etc.

Notes:

  • example of "vw" uninformative for users. Could link to ORCIDs and use the "nickname" from users.yaml for a more informative display
  • the source and user should not ben under "definition", create another section ?
  • whenever there is a reference (eg GOC_mtg_sensu), there should be a GO_REF to further describe it
  • 'Activity' in MF terms
    • Proposal is to keep only 'activity only under 'catalytic activity - ok ?

Paper identifying missing 'is_a' relations

David https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/advance-article/doi/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa106/5739437

Some missing relations are not: is it a version problem ? or maybe they aren't using the inferred version of the ontology ?

Is there any missing link that could be useful for the ontology ?

Non-GO editors people making PR in the ontology tracker

https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/17091

Isn't our policy that *only* GO editors work on the ontology ? Or do we want to allow some other users to make PRs?