Manager Call 2020-03-04: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "=Agenda= * Agenda: Laurent-Philippe * Minutes: David * Present: * Regrets: =Discussion points= === Caltech f2f, 24-28 Feb=== Summary ===GO meeting Paris=== Update ==...")
 
Line 10: Line 10:


=== Caltech f2f, 24-28 Feb===
=== Caltech f2f, 24-28 Feb===
Summary  
==== Summary ====
 
* One deliverable from the meeting was GPAD/GPI 2.0 specs. 
* A [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jpvnBX7h_zeVJO9-OJadMHcJyQNvd2CPyZvkvkWyQf4 Google doc] with the proposed changes and some comments is available for people to review.
* There are a few points where we still need a final decision (marked in red).


===GO meeting Paris===
===GO meeting Paris===

Revision as of 16:59, 3 March 2020

Agenda

  • Agenda: Laurent-Philippe
  • Minutes: David
  • Present:
  • Regrets:

Discussion points

Caltech f2f, 24-28 Feb

Summary

  • One deliverable from the meeting was GPAD/GPI 2.0 specs.
  • A Google doc with the proposed changes and some comments is available for people to review.
  • There are a few points where we still need a final decision (marked in red).

GO meeting Paris

Update

Discussion

Noctua/NEO

  • Loading UniProt Viral + bacterial GPI: This came up again from the multi-organism working group. They want to start making GO-CAM models. Can the loading of the GPI file be prioritized and assigned?

Paper identifying missing 'is_a' relations

David https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/advance-article/doi/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa106/5739437

Some missing relations are not: is it a version problem ? or maybe they aren't using the inferred version of the ontology ?

Is there any missing link that could be useful for the ontology ?

Non-GO editors people making PR in the ontology tracker

https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/17091


Isn't our policy that *only* GO editors work on the ontology ? Or do we want to allow some other users to make PRs?