Manager Call 2020-03-04: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "=Agenda= * Agenda: Laurent-Philippe * Minutes: David * Present: * Regrets: =Discussion points= === Caltech f2f, 24-28 Feb=== Summary ===GO meeting Paris=== Update ==...") |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
=== Caltech f2f, 24-28 Feb=== | === Caltech f2f, 24-28 Feb=== | ||
Summary | ==== Summary ==== | ||
* One deliverable from the meeting was GPAD/GPI 2.0 specs. | |||
* A [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jpvnBX7h_zeVJO9-OJadMHcJyQNvd2CPyZvkvkWyQf4 Google doc] with the proposed changes and some comments is available for people to review. | |||
* There are a few points where we still need a final decision (marked in red). | |||
===GO meeting Paris=== | ===GO meeting Paris=== |
Revision as of 16:59, 3 March 2020
Agenda
- Agenda: Laurent-Philippe
- Minutes: David
- Present:
- Regrets:
Discussion points
Caltech f2f, 24-28 Feb
Summary
- One deliverable from the meeting was GPAD/GPI 2.0 specs.
- A Google doc with the proposed changes and some comments is available for people to review.
- There are a few points where we still need a final decision (marked in red).
GO meeting Paris
Update
Discussion
Noctua/NEO
- Loading UniProt Viral + bacterial GPI: This came up again from the multi-organism working group. They want to start making GO-CAM models. Can the loading of the GPI file be prioritized and assigned?
Paper identifying missing 'is_a' relations
David https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/advance-article/doi/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa106/5739437
Some missing relations are not: is it a version problem ? or maybe they aren't using the inferred version of the ontology ?
Is there any missing link that could be useful for the ontology ?
Non-GO editors people making PR in the ontology tracker
https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/17091
Isn't our policy that *only* GO editors work on the ontology ? Or do we want to allow some other users to make PRs?