Manager Call 2020-06-17: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Isoforms NOT in AmiGO/products== | ==Isoforms NOT in AmiGO/products== | ||
(Pascale, from feedback from Ruth) | |||
https://github.com/geneontology/go-site/issues/1105 | https://github.com/geneontology/go-site/issues/1105 | ||
Should they not be ? | Should they not be ? | ||
| Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
3) some of Bader gene sets could be of interest for QC ? | 3) some of Bader gene sets could be of interest for QC ? | ||
==Updated GO managers page to match the Project Org chart== | |||
(Pascale) | |||
[[GO_Managers]] | |||
[[Category: GO Managers Meetings]] | [[Category: GO Managers Meetings]] | ||
Revision as of 03:59, 15 June 2020
Agenda
- Agenda: Laurent-Philippe
- Minutes: David
- Present:
- Regrets:
Isoforms NOT in AmiGO/products
(Pascale, from feedback from Ruth) https://github.com/geneontology/go-site/issues/1105 Should they not be ?
Bader gene sets
Approach to handle gene sets redundancy.
They are deriving gene sets for GO, but are using EBI and MGI for human and mouse annotations: http://baderlab.org/GeneSets#Sources.
Proposals: 1) contact them to explain the benefits of fetching annotations from GOC instead of EBI/MGI instead of GOC 2) page on the go site to explain the above (differences & benefits from fetching annotations from GOC rather than a source; eg check, validations, etc) 3) some of Bader gene sets could be of interest for QC ?
Updated GO managers page to match the Project Org chart
(Pascale)