Manager Call 2020-08-19: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
Line 63: Line 63:




==NAR paper==
===NAR paper===


Postpone item
Postpone item until next time


===GO Baltimore===
Started working on agenda
Kimberly: Maybe we can ping groups to send people to meeting now that it’s virtual.
===Discussion of “142” species===
additional species:
defer to next week
what about viral?
=== Signor ===
Signor import may be at the point where the import could be evaluated
=== GO Rules and responsible parties ===
Are people looking at GO summary table?
What about not-implemented rules?
Who is responsible for first-level triage for rule violations?
Pascale/Paul/Suzi: AspGD has some capacity bandwidth issues.
Judy: Maybe urgency needs to be marked better? Do we need more funding for this?
Pascale: do these species need to be prioritized?
Paul: isn’t fixing issues part of the agreement for being “active”?
What do we mean by “taking on” annotations from groups that are no longer active?
What do UniProt AspGD annotations look like against AspGD’s?
Are we being clear about expectations for what happens when groups can no longer support their annotations?
Pascale: I can easily spend a couple of days on updating/triaging on a concept per species.
PaulT: How would we fund this going forward?
Judy: Maybe we need to swing back to time for literature curation for future grants?


[[Category: GO Managers Meetings]]
[[Category: GO Managers Meetings]]

Latest revision as of 19:18, 23 August 2020

Agenda

  • Agenda: Kimberly
  • Minutes: Seth
  • Present: Chris, David, Judy, Kimberly, Pascale, Seth, Suzi

NAR paper

What's the status? Do we have individual writing assignments?

GO Baltimore

Basic page created with google doc to start filling agenda: http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/October_2020_Remote_GOC_Meeting_Logistics

Meeting folders in GO's Google drive

Decision by Michelle is not to have a Users meeting

User meeting, 3 half days

From last meeting, users preference were:

- enrichment analysis

- data access and integration

- hands-on, jupyter notebooks

- ontology

- curation

If it is up to a general audience, then we can customize it however we want. What do we want to communicate to a broader audience? Laurent-Philippe will contact Michelle.


Ongoing projects

Anyone has blocking issues/delays/changes in project scope they need to report to managers /PIs?

Ongoing projects update

MGI/wormbase imports

gpad/gpi 2.0

Legacy data

Noctua ui implementations

  • bug fixes
  • ART
  • testing and release framework


Pipeline support

Minerva support for noctua

Pathways2GO paper

Minerva/gpad output

Minutes

NAR paper

Postpone item until next time

GO Baltimore

Started working on agenda

Kimberly: Maybe we can ping groups to send people to meeting now that it’s virtual.

Discussion of “142” species

additional species:

defer to next week

what about viral?

Signor

Signor import may be at the point where the import could be evaluated

GO Rules and responsible parties

Are people looking at GO summary table?

What about not-implemented rules?

Who is responsible for first-level triage for rule violations?

Pascale/Paul/Suzi: AspGD has some capacity bandwidth issues.

Judy: Maybe urgency needs to be marked better? Do we need more funding for this?

Pascale: do these species need to be prioritized?

Paul: isn’t fixing issues part of the agreement for being “active”?

What do we mean by “taking on” annotations from groups that are no longer active?

What do UniProt AspGD annotations look like against AspGD’s?

Are we being clear about expectations for what happens when groups can no longer support their annotations?

Pascale: I can easily spend a couple of days on updating/triaging on a concept per species.

PaulT: How would we fund this going forward?

Judy: Maybe we need to swing back to time for literature curation for future grants?