New documentation for IKR: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 37: Line 37:
GO_REF:0000XXX
GO_REF:0000XXX


Manual determination of the loss of activity or location by curator judgment of sequence characteristics. This describes a method for supplying a NOT-qualified, IKR-evidenced GO annotation to a gene product, when general sequence homology considerations would suggest a function or location, or a role in a biological process, but where a curator has determined that the absence of key sequence residues indicates the gene product is unlikely to be able to carry out the implied activity, involvement in a process or cellular component location.   
Manual determination of the loss of activity or location by curator judgment of sequence characteristics.  
 
This describes a method for supplying a NOT-qualified, IKR-evidenced GO annotation to a gene product, when general sequence homology considerations would suggest a function or location, or a role in a biological process, but where a curator has determined that the absence of key sequence residues,  known to be required for an expected activity or location, indicating the gene product is unlikely to be able to carry out the implied activity, involvement in a process or cellular component location.   


This reference should only be used used when an IKR-evidenced annotation is made based on curator judgement from manually reviewing the sequence of the gene product and where no publication can be found to support the curators conclusion. It is preferable to cite a peer-reviewed publication (such as a PubMed identifier) for IKR-evidenced annotations whenever possible.  
This reference should only be used used when an IKR-evidenced annotation is made based on curator judgement from manually reviewing the sequence of the gene product and where no publication can be found to support the curators conclusion. It is preferable to cite a peer-reviewed publication (such as a PubMed identifier) for IKR-evidenced annotations whenever possible.  
Line 43: Line 45:
Curators will have carefully reviewed the sequence of the annotated protein, and established that the key residues known to be required for an expected activity or location are not present.
Curators will have carefully reviewed the sequence of the annotated protein, and established that the key residues known to be required for an expected activity or location are not present.


For more information on the IKR evidence code, please see documentation [http://www.geneontology.org/nonexistantlink here].
For more information on the IKR evidence code, please see documentation [http://www.geneontology.org/GO.evidence.shtml#ikr here]

Revision as of 08:17, 19 January 2012


New Documentation for IKR: Inferred from Key Residues

Current IKR documentation is located here

IKR: Inferred from Key Residues

Note: This evidence code was previously referred to as IMR (inferred from Missing Residues).

A type of phylogenetic evidence characterized by the loss of key sequence residues. All annotations that apply this evidence code should use the 'NOT' qualifier.

This evidence code is used to annotate a gene product when, although homologous to a particular protein family, it has lost essential catalytic residues and is very unlikely to have enzymatic activity, and therefore is unlikely to carry out the associated function or participate in the expected associated process.

This annotation statement can be supported by a PubMed reference which describes the sequence analysis efforts, or by a GO Reference, which describes the process a curator undertook to become sufficiently convinced of the sequence mutation.

Examples where the IKR evidence code should be used:

  • Rat HPT (P06866) is homologous to serine proteases and contains a match to the peptidase S1 domain. However further sequence analysis by a curator established it has lost all essential catalytic residues, making it unable to carry out serine protease activity.

Annotation: UniProtKB:P06866 NOT GO:0004252 serine-type endopeptidase activity IKR GO_REF:0000XXX UniProtKB

  • PMID:12568721

The authors describe the determination of serine protease activity of proteins from the D. melanogaster S1 serine protease gene family, by determining the presence of conserved His, Asp, Ser catalytic triad residues in retrieved sequences. If all three residues were present in the conserved TAAHC, DIAL, and GDSGGP motifs, the sequence was considered to have serine protease activity. Any sequence lacking one of the key residues was identified as an a serine protease homolog, lacking proteolytic activity.

Annotation:

FB:FBgn0033192 NOT GO:0004252 serine-type endopeptidase activity IKR PMID:12568721 FlyBase

Examples where the IKR evidence code should not be used:

  • If there is experimental evidence available from a publication to support a NOT-evidenced annotation. Make the IDA, IMP or EXP NOT-qualified annotation based on the experimental evidence.

New GO_REF draft to be used with IKR-evidenced annotations

GO_REF:0000XXX

Manual determination of the loss of activity or location by curator judgment of sequence characteristics.

This describes a method for supplying a NOT-qualified, IKR-evidenced GO annotation to a gene product, when general sequence homology considerations would suggest a function or location, or a role in a biological process, but where a curator has determined that the absence of key sequence residues, known to be required for an expected activity or location, indicating the gene product is unlikely to be able to carry out the implied activity, involvement in a process or cellular component location.

This reference should only be used used when an IKR-evidenced annotation is made based on curator judgement from manually reviewing the sequence of the gene product and where no publication can be found to support the curators conclusion. It is preferable to cite a peer-reviewed publication (such as a PubMed identifier) for IKR-evidenced annotations whenever possible.

Curators will have carefully reviewed the sequence of the annotated protein, and established that the key residues known to be required for an expected activity or location are not present.

For more information on the IKR evidence code, please see documentation here