OEWG 20090915: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
==== Bugs ==== | ==== Bugs ==== | ||
* [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2821389&group_id=36855&atid=418257 indestructable XPs] <font color=blue> In Progress </font> | |||
* [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2840500&group_id=36855&atid=418257 relation name vanishes] <font color=blue> Test</font> | * [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2840500&group_id=36855&atid=418257 relation name vanishes] <font color=blue> Test</font> | ||
* [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2745699&group_id=36855&atid=418257 2.0 graph viewer now shows only one parent] <font color=blue> Discussed a couple of weeks back - no consensus on behavior </font> | * [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2745699&group_id=36855&atid=418257 2.0 graph viewer now shows only one parent] <font color=blue> Discussed a couple of weeks back - no consensus on behavior </font> |
Revision as of 20:32, 14 September 2009
OBO-Edit Working Group, Tuesday September 15th, 2009 9.30 a.m. PDT
Conference call details:
US: 1-888-727-6732
Outside US: 1-719-867-3417
pin: 601425
Agenda/Chair: Amina
Minutes: KarenC
Attendees:
Action items carried over
Discussion items
- Updates from the development front
- Working on reasoner stuff
- OBO-Edit2.1 release next week
- Meeting next Tuesday 9/22 instead of Thursday 9/24 due to the GO consortium meeting.
Bugs
- indestructable XPs In Progress
- relation name vanishes Test
- 2.0 graph viewer now shows only one parent Discussed a couple of weeks back - no consensus on behavior
Features
- scroll lock (aka lock view) for global OTE DONE
- TO DO: allow only one OTE to be locked at a time
- TO DO: keyboard shortcut for locking
Consortium meeting
- Midori to communicate audience response to Amina during the OBO-Edit demo.
- Setup for webex and teleconfernce?
- Voice through webex was good during the OE demo last week.
- Discussion of has_part relationship and follow-on consequences
- Mike Cherry is also interested in making sure that this is discussed so if anyone from this group is planning to put an item on the agenda about this, please coordinate with him. Possible discussion issues include:
- display of has_part in AmiGO and in OBO-Edit
- annotation mapping issues relating to using has_part instead of part_of relationships
- Examples where the has_part relationship is used:
- in component, relationships between spliceosomal snRNPs and spliceosomal complexes
- in process, relationships relating to mRNA surveillance