OEWG 20091117: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'OBO-Edit Working Group, Tuesday November 17th, 2009 8.30 a.m. PDT <br> Conference call details:<br> US: 1-888-727-6732<br> Outside US: 1-719-867-3417<br> pin: 601425<br> Agenda…') |
(→Bugs) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
==== Bugs ==== | ==== Bugs ==== | ||
I am generating cross-product definitions in the Cell Ontology. To do this, I load the Cell ontology (CL), the three GO ontologies, PR0 and the Uberon ontology. I accidentally generated a cyclical relationship between the two terms after reasoning. I *think* this resulted from using two related GO processes in the cross-product definition but am not sure due to some buggy issues. | |||
# The "Explanation" feature both in the graph editor and in the Assert Implied links panel fail to explain reasoning. This is an issue Amina and Chris are aware of. | |||
# Perhaps related... the Parent editor fails to show implied links, even when the checkbox is checked. | |||
# Tree editor fails to show '''any''' relationship between the two terms (see picture). | |||
# Should have the verification manager prevented this cyclical relationship from occurring? The reasoner stopped running checks due to the number of errors (200) Most of these errors are miss-spellings in Uberon. | |||
==== Features ==== | ==== Features ==== |
Revision as of 11:20, 17 November 2009
OBO-Edit Working Group, Tuesday November 17th, 2009 8.30 a.m. PDT
Conference call details:
US: 1-888-727-6732
Outside US: 1-719-867-3417
pin: 601425
Agenda/Chair:
Minutes:
Attendees:
Action items carried over
Discussion items
Bugs
I am generating cross-product definitions in the Cell Ontology. To do this, I load the Cell ontology (CL), the three GO ontologies, PR0 and the Uberon ontology. I accidentally generated a cyclical relationship between the two terms after reasoning. I *think* this resulted from using two related GO processes in the cross-product definition but am not sure due to some buggy issues.
- The "Explanation" feature both in the graph editor and in the Assert Implied links panel fail to explain reasoning. This is an issue Amina and Chris are aware of.
- Perhaps related... the Parent editor fails to show implied links, even when the checkbox is checked.
- Tree editor fails to show any relationship between the two terms (see picture).
- Should have the verification manager prevented this cyclical relationship from occurring? The reasoner stopped running checks due to the number of errors (200) Most of these errors are miss-spellings in Uberon.