Difference between revisions of "OEWG 20100309"

From GO Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Cross product support issues)
Line 24: Line 24:
 
Examples:
 
Examples:
  
* [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=418257&aid=2952892&group_id=36855 Loss of intersection status on merge]
+
* [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2948445&group_id=36855&atid=418257 Loss of intersection status on merge]
 
* [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2821389&group_id=36855&atid=418257 indestructible XPs]
 
* [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2821389&group_id=36855&atid=418257 indestructible XPs]
 
** As long as only inferred classification is ignored, this issue can also be solved be treated intersections in the same way as relationships.
 
** As long as only inferred classification is ignored, this issue can also be solved be treated intersections in the same way as relationships.

Revision as of 08:51, 9 March 2010

OBO-Edit Working Group, Tuesday March 9th, 2010 8.30 a.m. PDT

Conference call details: New GOC conference call numbers
US: 1 866 953 9688
UK: 0808 238 6001
pin: 801561

Agenda/Chair: Amina
Minutes: Harold
Attendees:

Action items carried over

Bug and Feature Tracker Updates

Discussion items

Cross product support issues

There are a bunch of related issues to do with incomplete support for editing intersections. In most cases, I think we just need them to be treated like regular relationships. Perhaps the best thing to do would be to look at how editing works for relationships in various scenarios and check whether intersections are treated the same or not.

Examples:

Action Items

Links

Back to OEWG Meeting agenda and minutes List