OEWG 20110830: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 58: Line 58:
* [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3176685&group_id=36855&atid=418257 Is_a closure broken]
* [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3176685&group_id=36855&atid=418257 Is_a closure broken]
** Midori commented, "I can confirm that I get the same thing (or at least something similar) happening with 'regulates' relationships: is_a closure saves some terms that would only be there if it followed at least one 'regulates' link.
** Midori commented, "I can confirm that I get the same thing (or at least something similar) happening with 'regulates' relationships: is_a closure saves some terms that would only be there if it followed at least one 'regulates' link.
** Chris said "This has become a lower priority for OE, since we will be able to do most of this in Oort."  Should I stop working on this?


===Next bugs to work on===
===Next bugs to work on===

Revision as of 13:57, 25 August 2011

OBO-Edit Working Group Meeting: Tuesday, August 30, 2011, 8:30am PDT

Conference call numbers:
US: 1 866 953 9688
UK: 0808 238 6001
PIN: 801561

Agenda/Chair: Nomi Harris
Minutes:
Attendees:

Bug and Feature Trackers

Fixed since last meeting

  • Fixing JUnit tests for OBO and OBO-Edit
    • Fixed some tests; removed some that Chris M. said were obsolete
    • 2.1-b18 now passes a lot more tests than 2.0
    • 2.0:
      • 21/43 OBO JUnit tests pass
      • 1/24 OBO-Edit JUnit tests pass
    • 2.1-b18:
      • 38/38 OBO JUnit tests pass
      • 10/24 OBO-Edit JUnit tests pass
        • None of the failures are new--all 14 that fail now also failed in 2.0.

Discussion Items

  • New file browser had bug in b17--Heiko quickly fixed it and we released b18 the next day.
  • Did anyone (other than Midori) get a chance to test obo2obo to make sure my fix for [ geneontology-Bugs-3316815 ] (filtered save doesn't save dangling parents) didn't break anything in obo2obo?
    • Midori found one issue in obo2obo but it turned out to be old and unimportant
    • Fixed problem where obo2obo recently stopped printing status messages to stdout.
    • The obo2obo tests I tried yielded the same output for OE 2.0 and 2.1-b18.
  • Next meeting: we will skip Tuesday, September 6 and meet next on September 20.
  • With a new academic year starting, should we revisit the meeting day/time or just keep it as it is?

Currently working on

  • Working towards making an official 2.1 release
  • Is_a closure broken
    • Midori commented, "I can confirm that I get the same thing (or at least something similar) happening with 'regulates' relationships: is_a closure saves some terms that would only be there if it followed at least one 'regulates' link.
    • Chris said "This has become a lower priority for OE, since we will be able to do most of this in Oort." Should I stop working on this?

Next bugs to work on

  • Fixing any bugs that the JUnit tests reveal

Discussion

Links

Back to OEWG meeting agenda and minutes list