OE Webex 11Mar08

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
03/11/2008    09:27:52 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Hi there!
03/11/2008    09:28:06 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	knock wood
03/11/2008    09:28:50 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	David is connecting
03/11/2008    09:28:51 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	oh,
03/11/2008    09:28:53 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	he's in
03/11/2008    09:28:58 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Wow, people are very prompt this morning!  My clock says 9:28.
03/11/2008    09:29:01 AM    from Alexander Diehl:	Jen, change to All Particpants.
03/11/2008    09:29:13 AM    from Jen Deegan:	Hi Nomi, is recording disabled?
03/11/2008    09:29:15 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Jen, David does not want to be recorded.
03/11/2008    09:29:19 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	:)
03/11/2008    09:29:19 AM    from Jen Deegan:	oh
03/11/2008    09:29:23 AM    from Jen Deegan:	ok :-)
03/11/2008    09:29:25 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	You can prod him though.
03/11/2008    09:29:34 AM    from Jen Deegan:	it's okay I think everyone is coming anyway
03/11/2008    09:29:37 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I neither enabled nor disabled recording.
03/11/2008    09:29:42 AM    from Jen Deegan:	good-oh
03/11/2008    09:29:56 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Nomi, can you pass control to David already so we can get set up?
03/11/2008    09:30:06 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Yes
03/11/2008    09:30:20 AM    from Jen Deegan:	are we starting with 1.101 or 2?
03/11/2008    09:30:31 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	1.101 is all we're doing for now
03/11/2008    09:30:37 AM    from Jen Deegan:	righto
03/11/2008    09:30:48 AM    from Nomi Harris:	DavidH is the host now.
03/11/2008    09:31:12 AM    from Jen Deegan:	which file are you going to load?
03/11/2008    09:32:39 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Nomi, I dont' think everyone can see your comments.
03/11/2008    09:33:00 AM    from Harold:	I see no comments
03/11/2008    09:33:51 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Sometimes I'm seeing the OE window, but other times I just see a black screen with an arrow cursor moving around.
03/11/2008    09:34:05 AM    from midori:	same here, plus sometimes just a field of green
03/11/2008    09:34:15 AM    from midori:	I see O-E now ...
03/11/2008    09:34:17 AM    from Harold:	lets stop until everyone can see the same thing
03/11/2008    09:34:18 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Sorry, we're figuring out how to best display ;stuff.
03/11/2008    09:34:23 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	I'm on Skype with David
03/11/2008    09:34:28 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	and will type out what he's doing.
03/11/2008    09:34:30 AM    from David OS:	I'm just getting the green field too
03/11/2008    09:34:31 AM    from midori:	(and wow, that def needs work)
03/11/2008    09:34:31 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Ok.
03/11/2008    09:34:33 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	When shall we start?
03/11/2008    09:34:40 AM    from Nomi Harris:	(Yes, I was thinking that def was a bit weak!)
03/11/2008    09:34:55 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I think you can go ahead and start.
03/11/2008    09:35:12 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	For this example, we've loaded up the file go_regtest_withPosNeg_noPF_noXP.obo
03/11/2008    09:35:17 AM    from midori:	Nomi, you're on 'all attendees'
03/11/2008    09:35:25 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Argh
03/11/2008    09:35:28 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Why is that the default?
03/11/2008    09:35:34 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	which is in the go/scratch/regulates_test_files (or something like that)
03/11/2008    09:35:34 AM    from midori:	?????
03/11/2008    09:35:38 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Anyway, David and Tanya, please go ahead and start whenever you're ready.
03/11/2008    09:35:45 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	OK, ready to start.
03/11/2008    09:35:59 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	You have to go into the Global Filter Plugins and
03/11/2008    09:36:06 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	make sure that all you are left with in the LInk Filters
03/11/2008    09:36:13 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	is what David has showing now
03/11/2008    09:36:26 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	IMPT:
03/11/2008    09:36:35 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	get rid of the one that had to do with 'transitive' links
03/11/2008    09:36:41 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Save changes
03/11/2008    09:36:50 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	we are demonstrating adding a regulation term to cell deat
03/11/2008    09:36:52 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	death
03/11/2008    09:36:56 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	add new term as usual
03/11/2008    09:37:03 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	add term name as usual
03/11/2008    09:37:14 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	change relationship type to ''regulates'
03/11/2008    09:37:25 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	(please interrupt if we're going too fast)
03/11/2008    09:37:27 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	ok
03/11/2008    09:37:37 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	now, you need to find a 'regulation parent'
03/11/2008    09:37:43 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	for a biological process term,
03/11/2008    09:37:52 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	this will be something under regulation of biological process
03/11/2008    09:38:04 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	click on cell death and look at its graph
03/11/2008    09:38:06 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	like this
03/11/2008    09:38:16 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	it is_a death
03/11/2008    09:38:17 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	and it
03/11/2008    09:38:23 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	is_a cellular developmental process
03/11/2008    09:38:26 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	we don't have either of those
03/11/2008    09:38:32 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	regulation terms
03/11/2008    09:38:34 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	so
03/11/2008    09:38:39 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	it's up to the curator
03/11/2008    09:38:45 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	whether they would like to create
03/11/2008    09:38:47 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	regulation of deat
03/11/2008    09:38:49 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	death
03/11/2008    09:38:57 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	or regulation of cellular developmental process
03/11/2008    09:39:01 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	if you do not
03/11/2008    09:39:15 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	then this new regulation term goes to the best existing child
03/11/2008    09:39:19 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	which in this example is
03/11/2008    09:39:25 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	regulation of developmental process
03/11/2008    09:39:32 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	note that it ALSO
03/11/2008    09:39:35 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	has to go to
03/11/2008    09:39:40 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	regulation of cellular process
03/11/2008    09:39:49 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	since we did not create the compound term
03/11/2008    09:39:55 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	regulation of cellular developmental process
03/11/2008    09:40:04 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	any questions so far?
03/11/2008    09:40:09 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	or shall we proceed?
03/11/2008    09:40:17 AM    from Jen Deegan:	fine by me
03/11/2008    09:40:37 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	moving on then
03/11/2008    09:40:57 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	now we're going to create a negative regulation of cell death term
03/11/2008    09:41:03 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	and deal with this term's parentage
03/11/2008    09:41:07 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	same deal
03/11/2008    09:41:09 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	new term
03/11/2008    09:41:11 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	new term name
03/11/2008    09:41:17 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	change relationship type
03/11/2008    09:41:21 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	all the old familiar stuff
03/11/2008    09:41:33 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	now,
03/11/2008    09:41:38 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	we don't have neg reg of death
03/11/2008    09:41:48 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	sorry, David's mouse is being spastic
03/11/2008    09:41:56 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	we do have neg reg of cellular process
03/11/2008    09:42:07 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	so now this has a neg reg parent
03/11/2008    09:42:13 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	we also should add it to
03/11/2008    09:42:17 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	neg reg of dev process
03/11/2008    09:42:33 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	just like the parent term was added to reg of both cell and dev process
03/11/2008    09:42:39 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	now
03/11/2008    09:42:45 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	we go back to cell death
03/11/2008    09:43:09 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	and make a negative regulates relationship between the neg reg of cell death and the term cell death itself
03/11/2008    09:43:25 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	The final result, viewed in the Graphviz view is here.
03/11/2008    09:43:33 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	That's all folks.
03/11/2008    09:43:43 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Don't worry if you don't get all the parents right
03/11/2008    09:43:52 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Chris will find them with his brilliant scripts
03/11/2008    09:43:57 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	and we will fix them
03/11/2008    09:44:07 AM    from midori:	wooooo
03/11/2008    09:44:08 AM    from Jen Deegan:	what about children of negative regulation of cell death?
03/11/2008    09:44:12 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	as we'll be reviewing the QC reports on a regular basis
03/11/2008    09:44:23 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Jen, ok.
03/11/2008    09:44:30 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Good question (says David)
03/11/2008    09:44:36 AM    from Jen Deegan:	Thank you :-)
03/11/2008    09:44:43 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Here's new child.
03/11/2008    09:45:24 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Let's say this ig going to be neg reg of cell death involved in forebrain development
03/11/2008    09:45:37 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Then it becomes quite easy.
03/11/2008    09:45:57 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Just make an is_a child of the neg reg term
03/11/2008    09:46:01 AM    from jane lomax:	ack, the sooner we can get the obol functionality integrated into OE the better - there will be a lot of relations to add by hand now
03/11/2008    09:46:08 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Then make it a part_of forebrain development
03/11/2008    09:46:29 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	You bet!( says David)
03/11/2008    09:46:44 AM    from Jen Deegan:	can we also do a child process that doesn't have the words 'negative regulation'  in it?
03/11/2008    09:46:47 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	And I agree
03/11/2008    09:47:12 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	(for David) probably yes, as long as you make the correct is_a parentage
03/11/2008    09:47:24 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	but it will show up on our QC report as a problem
03/11/2008    09:47:29 AM    from Jen Deegan:	eh?
03/11/2008    09:47:31 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	if this really reflects biology that's ok
03/11/2008    09:47:33 AM    from Harold:	shouldn't the new term have a negatively_regulates relation to forebrain dev?
03/11/2008    09:48:03 AM    from midori:	not necessarily -- it's negatively regulating cell death.
03/11/2008    09:48:13 AM    from Jen Deegan:	or an involved_in relationship :-)
03/11/2008    09:48:23 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	if it's a normal process that occurs during forebrain development then
03/11/2008    09:48:30 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	it doesn't regulate forebrain development
03/11/2008    09:48:34 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	it is a part_of it
03/11/2008    09:49:01 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	We're not going to demo this in OE2 for now because regulates is going live before OE2 does.
03/11/2008    09:49:09 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	When OE2 does go live, we'll do another demo.
03/11/2008    09:49:22 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	I apologize if there were other people who wanted to see
03/11/2008    09:49:24 AM    from Jen Deegan:	can we do a process like 'sprocket coagulation' which happens to be a process that negatively regulates cell death?
03/11/2008    09:49:28 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	crossproducts in action
03/11/2008    09:49:40 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	but this is the current training that we'd like to get across.
03/11/2008    09:49:51 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Yes
03/11/2008    09:50:17 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	when it pops up on our QC report, we'll say it's ok and it won't show up again
03/11/2008    09:50:20 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	we hope
03/11/2008    09:50:20 AM    from midori:	I don't think I want my sprockets coagulating on me ...
03/11/2008    09:50:22 AM    from Harold:	Will the reasoner be able to spot errors in parentage?
03/11/2008    09:50:40 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	YES!
03/11/2008    09:50:45 AM    from Jen Deegan:	all of them?
03/11/2008    09:50:48 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	These are the bazillion QC reports that we're looking at.
03/11/2008    09:50:53 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	WE don't know
03/11/2008    09:50:56 AM    from Jen Deegan:	:-)
03/11/2008    09:50:59 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	but it sure spots alot
03/11/2008    09:51:10 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	enough to keep us busy till we retire
03/11/2008    09:51:13 AM    from Jen Deegan:	will you demo sprocket coagulation?
03/11/2008    09:51:29 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	I will ask David nicely.
03/11/2008    09:51:34 AM    from Jen Deegan:	thank you :-)
03/11/2008    09:51:58 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	whoops
03/11/2008    09:52:05 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	you are seeing an OBoEDit expert at work!
03/11/2008    09:52:25 AM    from Jen Deegan:	I'm very impressed!
03/11/2008    09:52:53 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	You've taught him all he knows.
03/11/2008    09:53:11 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Oh dear.
03/11/2008    09:53:22 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Find that undo button!
03/11/2008    09:53:36 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	He's good at undoing.
03/11/2008    09:53:50 AM    from Jen Deegan:	would it be possibl to make the ontology editor panel wider?
03/11/2008    09:54:23 AM    from DavidH:	tanya just got dumped from the meeting
03/11/2008    09:54:25 AM    from Harold:	green screen of death
03/11/2008    09:54:32 AM    from Jen Deegan:	all gone
03/11/2008    09:54:37 AM    from Jen Deegan:	back
03/11/2008    09:54:38 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	I'm back
03/11/2008    09:54:48 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	First time I got kicked out of a webex meeting.
03/11/2008    09:54:56 AM    from midori:	welcome to the club
03/11/2008    09:55:08 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	never happened on my Windows machine before
03/11/2008    09:55:19 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	ooooh
03/11/2008    09:55:21 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	I'm cloned
03/11/2008    09:55:31 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Where's that spell check?
03/11/2008    09:55:38 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Jen, is sprocket coagulation part of anything?
03/11/2008    09:55:45 AM    from Jen Deegan:	um
03/11/2008    09:55:51 AM    from Jen Deegan:	no I don't think so
03/11/2008    09:56:02 AM    from Jen Deegan:	it's just a type of negative regulation of cell death
03/11/2008    09:56:02 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	well, then, that's all
03/11/2008    09:56:04 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	you need
03/11/2008    09:56:13 AM    from Jen Deegan:	does it get a negatively regulates relationship?
03/11/2008    09:56:13 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	really
03/11/2008    09:56:19 AM    from Jen Deegan:	to cell death?
03/11/2008    09:56:32 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	it does through the is_a path
03/11/2008    09:56:34 AM    from midori:	wouldn't that be redundant?
03/11/2008    09:56:45 AM    from Jen Deegan:	oh so it inherits that
03/11/2008    09:56:52 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	correct
03/11/2008    09:56:54 AM    from Jen Deegan:	yes I see
03/11/2008    09:56:57 AM    from Jen Deegan:	gotcha
03/11/2008    09:57:10 AM    from Nomi Harris:	What's the difference between the top left panel and the bottom left panel?
03/11/2008    09:57:25 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	no difference
03/11/2008    09:57:30 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	just different parts of the ontology
03/11/2008    09:57:35 AM    from Jen Deegan:	any chance of a screenshot of that or something?
03/11/2008    09:57:37 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	makes it easier to edit
03/11/2008    09:57:51 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	it will be in the documentation
03/11/2008    09:58:04 AM    from Harold:	in OE2 you can just add another edit panel
03/11/2008    09:58:05 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	(which is almost ready for prime time)
03/11/2008    09:58:10 AM    from Jen Deegan:	I got the screenshot myself
03/11/2008    09:58:13 AM    from Harold:	to get the same thing
03/11/2008    09:58:16 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	that's right
03/11/2008    09:58:21 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	take matters into your own hands
03/11/2008    09:58:30 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	you can get one later when David commits this to the live go
03/11/2008    09:58:33 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	:)
03/11/2008    09:58:40 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	anything else?
03/11/2008    09:58:41 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	if not,
03/11/2008    09:58:46 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	I have to go to another meeting
03/11/2008    09:58:53 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Thank you, Tanya and David, for that demo.
03/11/2008    09:58:53 AM    from Jen Deegan:	that was brilliant, thanks.
03/11/2008    09:59:00 AM    from midori:	so we get regulates, + reg and - reg on the 25th?
03/11/2008    09:59:06 AM    from Nomi Harris:	And I apologize to everyone for the confusion about the meeting time and date!
03/11/2008    09:59:08 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Yes ma'am.
03/11/2008    09:59:20 AM    from midori:	Then I'm cool. But not as cool as you.
03/11/2008    09:59:32 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	David is going to try to give control back to Nomi.
03/11/2008    09:59:50 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	He doesn't know how to make you the host again.
03/11/2008    09:59:52 AM    from Jen Deegan:	Thanks David! That was a magnificent feat of editing.
03/11/2008    09:59:56 AM    from Nomi Harris:	It still says "DavidH (host") but I now have a green button.
03/11/2008    10:00:08 AM    from midori:	that means Nomi is presenter
03/11/2008    10:00:09 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	yes, this means that you can present
03/11/2008    10:00:12 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	snap!
03/11/2008    10:00:13 AM    from Nomi Harris:	It doesn't matter, as long as we finish the meeting before David leaves.
03/11/2008    10:00:22 AM    from midori:	glad we agree!
03/11/2008    10:00:25 AM    from Nomi Harris:	If the host leaves, the meeting ends.
03/11/2008    10:00:28 AM    from Jen Deegan:	I just saved the chat, just in case
03/11/2008    10:00:44 AM    from midori:	nomi, do you have a menu option for 'reclaim host role', under 'participant'?
03/11/2008    10:00:53 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Yes, I just tried that.  It asked for the host key.
03/11/2008    10:00:53 AM    from Karen:	thanks Tanya, I have to leave now too
03/11/2008    10:00:54 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Got to go.
03/11/2008    10:00:56 AM    from Tanya Berardini:	Bye
03/11/2008    10:01:09 AM    from midori:	bye, and thanks!
03/11/2008    10:01:16 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Bye, Tanya and Karen.
03/11/2008    10:01:27 AM    from Jen Deegan:	Nomi, it's showing you as host for me
03/11/2008    10:01:36 AM    from midori:	maybe try the webex account password? (disclaimer: I'm guessing!)
03/11/2008    10:01:43 AM    from Harold:	DavidH is listed as host here
03/11/2008    10:01:51 AM    from DavidH:	I think you get the host key in you host e-mail
03/11/2008    10:01:51 AM    from midori:	odd - I have Nomi as presenter but DavidH as host.
03/11/2008    10:01:57 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Me too
03/11/2008    10:02:04 AM    from Jen Deegan:	oh yes
03/11/2008    10:02:13 AM    from Jen Deegan:	misunderstood the beachball
03/11/2008    10:02:22 AM    from DavidH:	I think I remember reading something about claiming back host privledges when I've hosted
03/11/2008    10:02:46 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Let's not worry about it--let's just finish any other topics and then we can end the meeting.
03/11/2008    10:02:54 AM    from Jen Deegan:	David could just leave it running until we are done
03/11/2008    10:03:11 AM    from Harold:	we need to get the icons decided
03/11/2008    10:03:16 AM    �
03/11/2008    10:03:22 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I didn't do a release between meetings because I am still changing class names for the components (e.g. DAG View -> Tree Viewer).
03/11/2008    10:03:23 AM    from Jen Deegan:	very urgent!
03/11/2008    10:03:27 AM    from DavidH:	ok, but I'm going to do other stuff though
03/11/2008    10:03:30 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Yes, we definitely need to settle on icons.
03/11/2008    10:03:38 AM    from Nomi Harris:	That's fine, David.  There won't be a quiz later.
03/11/2008    10:03:38 AM    from Jen Deegan:	did everybody see the wiki?
03/11/2008    10:03:46 AM    from Harold:	and how to get them into OE 1.1
03/11/2008    10:04:13 AM    from David OS:	wiki?
03/11/2008    10:04:19 AM    from Jen Deegan:	http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Regulates_icons_in_OBO-Edit
03/11/2008    10:04:26 AM    from Jen Deegan:	all possible options are there
03/11/2008    10:04:33 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I am neutral.
03/11/2008    10:04:39 AM    from midori:	me too
03/11/2008    10:04:48 AM    from Jen Deegan:	Amelia is to figure something out and send it back poste haste so this is the time to say what you think
03/11/2008    10:05:12 AM    from Jen Deegan:	I like the black arrow ones amelia made if they were a bit bigger
03/11/2008    10:05:14 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I think the arrows are nice in a big size but suffer somewhat when they are shrunk.
03/11/2008    10:05:23 AM    from Jen Deegan:	I think if the svgs had worked they might have been bigger
03/11/2008    10:05:33 AM    from Harold:	I just had david tranfer host to Nomi
03/11/2008    10:05:37 AM    from Jen Deegan:	I also like the blue letter ones for legibility
03/11/2008    10:05:46 AM    �
03/11/2008    10:06:13 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Jen, I'm not sure the arrow svgs would be bigger.  The way they are now, they are as tall as the is_a icon.
03/11/2008    10:06:46 AM    from Jen Deegan:	do you think so?
03/11/2008    10:06:50 AM    from Nomi Harris:	The blue ones are good.  I don't love the yellowish-background black ones.
03/11/2008    10:06:50 AM    from Jen Deegan:	they seemed smaller to me
03/11/2008    10:06:59 AM    from Jen Deegan:	I agree
03/11/2008    10:07:07 AM    from Jen Deegan:	the yellowish background is a bit funny
03/11/2008    10:07:21 AM    from Jen Deegan:	I think the big letters stand out well
03/11/2008    10:07:25 AM    from gwg:	what I would like to do is to create an icon set where the letter are all of the same size
03/11/2008    10:07:26 AM    from Nomi Harris:	The biggest dimension of each arrow looks to me to match the is_a icon.
03/11/2008    10:07:38 AM    from Nomi Harris:	However, since the arrows are not round, their smaller dimension is not as big as the is_a icon.
03/11/2008    10:07:47 AM    from gwg:	currently the size of the letter is somewhat dependent on the shape it's in
03/11/2008    10:07:53 AM    from Jen Deegan:	yes it's true
03/11/2008    10:08:01 AM    from Jen Deegan:	I found that difficult to handle too
03/11/2008    10:08:11 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Yes, it would look nicer if the R were the same size in all three icons.
03/11/2008    10:08:13 AM    from Jen Deegan:	even with square icons they went oblong in oboedit
03/11/2008    10:08:40 AM    from Jen Deegan:	Nomi, are you looking at the AmiGO screenshot or the oboedit one?
03/11/2008    10:08:42 AM    from gwg:	I can spend a bit more time on it if people would like - those icons were just a first draft really
03/11/2008    10:08:47 AM    from Nomi Harris:	oboedit
03/11/2008    10:08:50 AM    from Jen Deegan:	oh good
03/11/2008    10:09:00 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Well, both, actually.
03/11/2008    10:09:03 AM    from Jen Deegan:	We seem to be getting a bit pressed for time
03/11/2008    10:09:12 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Anyway, I really don't mind which icons are picked.  Just let me know and I'll add them to OE2.
03/11/2008    10:09:14 AM    from Jen Deegan:	would you be able to work on them quite soon?
03/11/2008    10:09:26 AM    from Jen Deegan:	Chris asked for them by the end of last week
03/11/2008    10:09:38 AM    from gwg:	I can take a shot at them tomorrow - I just had some AmiGO stuff I needed to do, but I've done that now
03/11/2008    10:09:42 AM    from Jen Deegan:	great
03/11/2008    10:09:47 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Who is gwg?
03/11/2008    10:09:50 AM    from Jen Deegan:	Amelia
03/11/2008    10:09:59 AM    from gwg:	lol!
03/11/2008    10:09:59 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Oh.  I guess that should have been obvious (???)
03/11/2008    10:10:09 AM    from Jen Deegan:	not necessarily :-)
03/11/2008    10:10:17 AM    from Harold:	the Girl With the Glasses
03/11/2008    10:10:29 AM    from Nomi Harris:	It should be the Girl with the Guitar.
03/11/2008    10:10:35 AM    from Harold:	ah,I like that one
03/11/2008    10:10:36 AM    from Jen Deegan:	nice!
03/11/2008    10:10:40 AM    from Harold:	better
03/11/2008    10:10:41 AM    from gwg:	Guitar*S*!
03/11/2008    10:10:47 AM    from Jen Deegan:	:-)
03/11/2008    10:10:59 AM    from Nomi Harris:	You're coming back to Berkeley after the GO meeting, right, gwg?
03/11/2008    10:11:18 AM    from gwg:	as long as visa things get sorted, yes :D
03/11/2008    10:11:31 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Fingers crossed!
03/11/2008    10:11:38 AM    from Jen Deegan:	so is the plan that Amelia works on getting the sizes better and gets back to us?
03/11/2008    10:11:43 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Yes
03/11/2008    10:12:16 AM    from Jen Deegan:	We should just concentrate on the icons people liek most
03/11/2008    10:12:20 AM    from gwg:	ok, I'll get something done and send it around tomorrow
03/11/2008    10:12:23 AM    from Jen Deegan:	is that the arrow ones and the blue letter ones?
03/11/2008    10:12:26 AM    from Harold:	Just occurred to me that the look of the icons may be tied into whatever screen res you have
03/11/2008    10:12:33 AM    from gwg:	yes, let me know which are the best
03/11/2008    10:12:42 AM    from Jen Deegan:	anyone keen on the others?
03/11/2008    10:12:49 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Karen, I'm going to look into that delete problem some more.  If you have any more info about what seems to trigger it, please let me know.
03/11/2008    10:13:00 AM    from Harold:	I've always like the arrow
03/11/2008    10:13:05 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I thought the triangles were ok.
03/11/2008    10:13:09 AM    from Erika:	I like the arrows too
03/11/2008    10:13:18 AM    from gwg:	also, I was thinking it might be better to have the icons of the same colour because otherwise people tend to discriminate based on colour rather than clarity of shape
03/11/2008    10:13:35 AM    from gwg:	I was going to do black 'n' white icons and then we can worry about a colour afterwards
03/11/2008    10:13:43 AM    from Jen Deegan:	good idea
03/11/2008    10:13:45 AM    from Harold:	good
03/11/2008    10:13:47 AM    from Nomi Harris:	yes
03/11/2008    10:13:49 AM    from Jen Deegan:	to be honest I like the arrows in black
03/11/2008    10:13:56 AM    from Harold:	I do also
03/11/2008    10:14:03 AM    from Jen Deegan:	but as you say, good to leave colour out at this stage
03/11/2008    10:14:29 AM    from Harold:	but that might be because of how they were surrounded by the terms with the other relationships
03/11/2008    10:14:43 AM    from Jen Deegan:	it might be good to have the icons actually bigger than the current icons if it means they look the same size, if you see what I mean,
03/11/2008    10:15:13 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I think OE scales them somehow, though I haven't figured out exactly how it decides on the size.
03/11/2008    10:15:32 AM    from Jen Deegan:	I thik th
03/11/2008    10:15:34 AM    from gwg:	it could be that obo-edit could be configured to have icons in certain colours, esp. given that the colours of svgs can be specified as html colour codes
03/11/2008    10:15:39 AM    from Jen Deegan:	I think that's the problem
03/11/2008    10:15:49 AM    from Harold:	I think its the size of the letter inside of the  arrow that is smaller than the  I or P in the other two
03/11/2008    10:16:05 AM    from Jen Deegan:	yes
03/11/2008    10:16:05 AM    from Harold:	So to get those to  the same  size would mean making thearrow larger
03/11/2008    10:16:12 AM    from Jen Deegan:	but the actual arrow seems smaller to me too
03/11/2008    10:16:26 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Optical illusion
03/11/2008    10:16:32 AM    from Jen Deegan:	yes I know
03/11/2008    10:16:34 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I agree with Harold, it's just the letter r that's smaller.
03/11/2008    10:16:39 AM    from Harold:	it does to me also
03/11/2008    10:16:44 AM    from Jen Deegan:	but we need it to be actually bigger to make it appear the samme size
03/11/2008    10:16:55 AM    from Nomi Harris:	But OE may then just scale it down again to the size it likes.
03/11/2008    10:17:07 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I will see if I can figure out what's up with that.  Amelia, maybe you can make a few different sizes so I can experiment?
03/11/2008    10:17:10 AM    from Jen Deegan:	on my screen the arrow is *definately* smaller
03/11/2008    10:17:19 AM    from gwg:	yes, will do
03/11/2008    10:17:21 AM    from Harold:	is there any .. white space  at the  tip of the icon itself?
03/11/2008    10:17:21 AM    from Jen Deegan:	thanks
03/11/2008    10:18:07 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Ok, Jen, we believe you <pat pat>
03/11/2008    10:18:12 AM    from Jen Deegan:	Thank you :-)
03/11/2008    10:18:18 AM    from Jen Deegan:	<sigh>
03/11/2008    10:18:39 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Any other things to discuss?
03/11/2008    10:18:47 AM    from Jen Deegan:	nothing from me
03/11/2008    10:19:18 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I think I've fixed the dangling refs problem
03/11/2008    10:19:23 AM    from midori:	I've put in a couple more bug reports ... OE performance with the reasoner on is bad again ...
03/11/2008    10:19:32 AM    from Nomi Harris:	:-(
03/11/2008    10:19:42 AM    from Nomi Harris:	It got better, and then worse again?
03/11/2008    10:19:42 AM    from midori:	but we don't have to discuss that now, unelss anyone has a dramatic insight
03/11/2008    10:20:10 AM    from midori:	Nomi - yes, it did. It's not quite as bad as 1.1x but it's nowhere near as good as it was several betas ago.
03/11/2008    10:20:21 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Weird.  I don't know why that would have changed.
03/11/2008    10:20:33 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I don't see that bug report.
03/11/2008    10:20:35 AM    from midori:	to annoy me, perhaps?
03/11/2008    10:20:40 AM    from midori:	it's new today ...
03/11/2008    10:20:55 AM    from midori:	https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1911989&group_id=36855&atid=418257
03/11/2008    10:21:00 AM    from Jen Deegan:	maybe somebody pinched Midori's ram
03/11/2008    10:21:17 AM    from midori:	hmm, 'puter still thinks it's there ;)
03/11/2008    10:21:22 AM    from Jen Deegan:	:-)
03/11/2008    10:21:24 AM    from Nomi Harris:	weird, it wasn't showing up when I did browse.
03/11/2008    10:21:34 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Anyway, I'll see if I can figure out what's up.  I didn't change anything in the reasoner.
03/11/2008    10:21:46 AM    from midori:	frustrating, I know ...
03/11/2008    10:22:20 AM    from Nomi Harris:	See you all next week?
03/11/2008    10:22:20 AM    from David OS:	"I think I've fixed the dangling refs problem" - most excellent.
03/11/2008    10:22:28 AM    from Nomi Harris:	When does the UK switch to summer time?
03/11/2008    10:22:29 AM    from midori:	well, I oughta get going here ...
03/11/2008    10:22:35 AM    from Nomi Harris:	(and Europe)
03/11/2008    10:22:39 AM    from midori:	March 30th
03/11/2008    10:22:40 AM    from Jen Deegan:	Yes, have a good week.
03/11/2008    10:22:50 AM    from Nomi Harris:	So we'll meet again at 4:30GMT next week if that's ok with everyone.
03/11/2008    10:22:56 AM    from midori:	fine with me
03/11/2008    10:23:01 AM    from David OS:	works for me too
03/11/2008    10:23:03 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Good.
03/11/2008    10:23:09 AM    from Harold:	Midori: if you do multiple searches in a row, and it starts slowing down,  it might point to a problem outside of the reasoner.