OE Webex 16Sep08

From GO Wiki
Revision as of 06:45, 17 September 2008 by Midori (talk | contribs) (New page: <pre> 09/16/2008 09:26:31 AM from Nomi Harris: Hi 09/16/2008 09:26:37 AM from David OS: Hi Nomi 09/16/2008 09:26:53 AM from Nomi Harris: Hi, Karen 09/16/2008 09:27:44 ...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
09/16/2008    09:26:31 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Hi
09/16/2008    09:26:37 AM    from David OS:	Hi Nomi
09/16/2008    09:26:53 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Hi, Karen
09/16/2008    09:27:44 AM    from Amina:	Hi Everyone
09/16/2008    09:27:46 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Hey, midori
09/16/2008    09:28:19 AM    from Karen:	Hi all
09/16/2008    09:28:34 AM    from Nomi Harris:	You guys are so amazingly prompt.
09/16/2008    09:29:19 AM    from David OS:	Occasionally prompt might be a more apt description of me
09/16/2008    09:29:34 AM    from JenDeegan:	Hi
09/16/2008    09:29:49 AM    from midori:	Hi
09/16/2008    09:29:58 AM    from Amina:	Hi Jen and Midori
09/16/2008    09:30:05 AM    from JenDeegan:	Good meeting midori?
09/16/2008    09:30:14 AM    from Amina:	Agenda items for today?
09/16/2008    09:30:18 AM    from midori:	amazing and occasional are not mutually exclusive ;)
09/16/2008    09:30:48 AM    from JenDeegan:	I don't think I have anything.
09/16/2008    09:30:58 AM    from David OS:	amazingly I was prompt
09/16/2008    09:31:05 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I just sent you mail about the memory setting.
09/16/2008    09:31:25 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I don't know why the installer wants to set it so high--does that computer have a lot of memory?
09/16/2008    09:31:29 AM    from JenDeegan:	Yes thanks, I'll do that tomorrow.
09/16/2008    09:31:37 AM    from JenDeegan:	yes 3.5 G
09/16/2008    09:32:17 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Anyway, I forgot to mention that in the meantime, users can simply manually set the memory down a bit in the installer.
09/16/2008    09:32:24 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I know no one ever does that, but it is possible.
09/16/2008    09:32:24 AM    from JenDeegan:	yes that's very true
09/16/2008    09:32:32 AM    from JenDeegan:	good point
09/16/2008    09:32:44 AM    from David OS:	Ahh - that sounds familiar.  My linux box has 6G and the installer always defaults to the max - while telling me that Java can't deal with more than 2.  What's the fix?
09/16/2008    09:32:56 AM    from JenDeegan:	!?
09/16/2008    09:33:00 AM    from JenDeegan:	that's a lot of RAM
09/16/2008    09:33:01 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I'm working with Jen to find the max that works and make the installer limit it to that.
09/16/2008    09:33:25 AM    from Nomi Harris:	The max for java is 2048M, so I tried setting it to that, which works for me, but doesn't work for Jen.
09/16/2008    09:33:26 AM    from Amina:	The memory allocation can be manually set in the configuration manager
09/16/2008    09:33:45 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Amina, if it's set too high when you install OE, you can't even start up OE to get at the config manager.
09/16/2008    09:34:08 AM    from Amina:	Right
09/16/2008    09:34:22 AM    from Nomi Harris:	So I'm going to make sure the installer doesn't let you pick a setting that is too high.
09/16/2008    09:34:30 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Apparently 2048M is too high on Windows.
09/16/2008    09:34:40 AM    from David OS:	It doesn't seem to matter what I set it too while installing - the installet always defaults to the max system memory when I install the next version
09/16/2008    09:34:52 AM    from David OS:	2048 is fine on linux
09/16/2008    09:34:53 AM    from JenDeegan:	on the plus side it means that one of our other EBI people is now testing the beta version.
09/16/2008    09:34:54 AM    from Harold:	Mine appears to grab 50% of the total memory
09/16/2008    09:35:07 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Yes, that will be good, Jen.
09/16/2008    09:35:11 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Harold, at least it's not 100%.
09/16/2008    09:35:18 AM    from JenDeegan:	:-)
09/16/2008    09:35:51 AM    from midori:	mine usually suggests around 2/3 of what the machine has
09/16/2008    09:36:18 AM    from Nomi Harris:	In the installer code, it suggests 80% of what you have.
09/16/2008    09:36:27 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Maybe that's a bit high.
09/16/2008    09:36:50 AM    from JenDeegan:	does that mean that some of Harold's ram is broken?
09/16/2008    09:36:56 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I don't know.
09/16/2008    09:36:58 AM    from David OS:	Can you set it to max out at the max java can cope with?
09/16/2008    09:37:01 AM    from midori:	the suggestions have been fine for me
09/16/2008    09:37:05 AM    from JenDeegan:	if it's picking 50 of what he think he has when it should be picking 80%?
09/16/2008    09:37:06 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Yes, David, that's what I'm trying to do.
09/16/2008    09:37:19 AM    from Nomi Harris:	That should be 2048M, but 2048M doesn't work for Jen.
09/16/2008    09:37:28 AM    from midori:	Jen - that's kind of beyond the scope of this meeting ...
09/16/2008    09:37:30 AM    from JenDeegan:	yes it's weird that.
09/16/2008    09:37:37 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I wouldn't worry about the 50%.
09/16/2008    09:37:39 AM    from JenDeegan:	yeah, just a thought for harold.
09/16/2008    09:37:46 AM    from Nomi Harris:	As we pointed out, Harold (or anyone) can always change that setting.
09/16/2008    09:38:01 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I should probably make sure that if you change it in the config manager, you don't make it >2048M
09/16/2008    09:38:04 AM    from Nomi Harris:	(or whatever we decide the max is)
09/16/2008    09:38:09 AM    from Nomi Harris:	because then you can't start up OE.
09/16/2008    09:38:19 AM    from Harold:	I just checked.. I thought I had more ram on this new machine than I do;  SO it's closer 75% (1.5 out of 2 (not 3))
09/16/2008    09:38:31 AM    from Amina:	Maybe we should document this in the user guide
09/16/2008    09:38:36 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I was hoping Melissa would be here today so she could demo the problem she's having that I can't replicate:
09/16/2008    09:38:44 AM    from midori:	mental arithmetic rears its ugly head
09/16/2008    09:38:57 AM    from Nomi Harris:	it takes a long time (7 sec, she says) to select terms in the OTE when she clicks on certain terms.
09/16/2008    09:39:07 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I tried her example and it was fast for me.
09/16/2008    09:39:18 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Is anyone else finding it slow to click on terms in the OTE?
09/16/2008    09:39:28 AM    from JenDeegan:	has she got the verification checks turned off?
09/16/2008    09:39:40 AM    from Nomi Harris:	(By the way, one thing to try if it is slow is closing nodes you're not interested in--if a lot of the tree is open, it takes longer to redraw.)
09/16/2008    09:39:40 AM    from JenDeegan:	I just occassionally find it slow.
09/16/2008    09:39:40 AM    from midori:	I've used b49 a little -- it's going well so far. I don't seem to get selection delays much any more (so far).
09/16/2008    09:39:56 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Jen, she sent me her config and I tried running with that and didn't get the selection delay.
09/16/2008    09:40:03 AM    from JenDeegan:	weird
09/16/2008    09:40:10 AM    from JenDeegan:	I do get slow selections sometimes
09/16/2008    09:40:16 AM    from JenDeegan:	but not nearly as often as before.
09/16/2008    09:40:21 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Yesterday I was able to reproduce Jane's problem with the definition spell check.
09/16/2008    09:40:35 AM    from midori:	Changing selection was waaay slow in several previous betas; if b49 keeps treating me well I might say that's fixed for me.
09/16/2008    09:40:36 AM    from Nomi Harris:	When you get a slow selection, can you try to write down the circumstances?
09/16/2008    09:41:06 AM    from JenDeegan:	yes sure.
09/16/2008    09:41:12 AM    from Nomi Harris:	midori, in b49 I did an optimization for selection in OTE that makes it faster
09/16/2008    09:41:20 AM    from JenDeegan:	the thing is that it's very inconsistent
09/16/2008    09:41:21 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Glad to hear it's working well for you.
09/16/2008    09:41:23 AM    from midori:	so far so good!
09/16/2008    09:41:36 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Jen, maybe it happens when it's doing something else in the background, like an autosave?
09/16/2008    09:41:44 AM    from JenDeegan:	oh that's a thought.
09/16/2008    09:41:48 AM    from JenDeegan:	I'll have a look.
09/16/2008    09:42:08 AM    from Nomi Harris:	So, I'm sorry to say that this is basically the last day I will be working on OBO-Edit. :-(
09/16/2008    09:42:14 AM    from JenDeegan:	aw....
09/16/2008    09:42:16 AM    from Nomi Harris:	My temporary appointment at LBNL has run out.
09/16/2008    09:42:19 AM    from Harold:	!!
09/16/2008    09:42:34 AM    from midori:	<sniff>
09/16/2008    09:42:36 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I will be working mostly on an external consulting job, and will spend only an hour or so a week on OE.
09/16/2008    09:42:41 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I know, I'm bummed too!
09/16/2008    09:42:54 AM    from Nomi Harris:	It's possible that when Suzi gets back, she'll find a way to fix it.
09/16/2008    09:43:18 AM    from Nomi Harris:	At least I will not totally vanish--I will answer email and will even be physically present in the office to look at puzzling bugs with Amina.
09/16/2008    09:43:37 AM    from midori:	so at least we don't have to go cold turkey
09/16/2008    09:43:56 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Right.
09/16/2008    09:44:06 AM    from Harold:	GO:0060292
09/16/2008    09:44:14 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Huh?
09/16/2008    09:44:36 AM    from Harold:		long term depression
09/16/2008    09:44:46 AM    from Tanya:	lol
09/16/2008    09:44:48 AM    from Nomi Harris:	:-)
09/16/2008    09:45:08 AM    from Nomi Harris:	It's like the religious people who like to cite Bible verses that are appropriate to the situation--you cite GO terms.
09/16/2008    09:45:17 AM    from Harold:	these GO terms are good for more than just annotation!
09/16/2008    09:45:47 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Amina will run the future OEWG meetings, but I will try to attend.
09/16/2008    09:45:59 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Do you want to continue having them once a week, or have some of you felt like that was too frequent?
09/16/2008    09:46:33 AM    from Harold:	I think we should cetainly have one close to just after a new release gets issued
09/16/2008    09:46:34 AM    from JenDeegan:	If people would like to have fewer working group meetings, I would quite like a bit of time for developer chat.
09/16/2008    09:46:50 AM    from JenDeegan:	just if the time was not needed for other things.
09/16/2008    09:47:03 AM    from Karen:	weekly seems fine, that way they're usually shorter, or people have time to ask questions
09/16/2008    09:47:03 AM    from Tanya:	That would be good (fewer meetings).
09/16/2008    09:47:15 AM    from Amina:	I'll also be spening more time looking into the bugs-of -the -week and try to have quick fixes out
09/16/2008    09:47:19 AM    from midori:	I think we'll want once-a-week meetings for the whole wg when we're in the final testing push. But we're probably not at that stage yet.
09/16/2008    09:47:20 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I figured consistency was good, and that not everyone had to attend every week.
09/16/2008    09:47:39 AM    from JenDeegan:	how about office hours every other week?
09/16/2008    09:47:48 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Frankly, I never really understood the difference.
09/16/2008    09:48:00 AM    from midori:	I don't have a strong preference, but the office hours thing was working pretty well for a while.
09/16/2008    09:48:05 AM    from JenDeegan:	I think the plan is that important demos only happen in main meetings
09/16/2008    09:48:06 AM    from Nomi Harris:	It just seemed confusing to me to have two similar-but-different meetings.
09/16/2008    09:48:22 AM    from Nomi Harris:	We generally aren't demoing big new features because we are not adding big new features.
09/16/2008    09:48:27 AM    from JenDeegan:	true
09/16/2008    09:48:35 AM    from midori:	By 'office hours' we meant a time slot when we knew John would be available to have us demo bugs at him.
09/16/2008    09:48:36 AM    from Tanya:	Nomi- it is/was confusing for me as well
09/16/2008    09:48:41 AM    from Karen:	When we alternated meetings with office hours, meetings had agendas for specific things to discuss or demo, while office hours were for questions
09/16/2008    09:48:56 AM    from midori:	If the distinction isn't meaningful now, we don't need to keep using it.p
09/16/2008    09:49:06 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I didn't really see the point of the distinction, but if people prefer it that way, that's fine.
09/16/2008    09:49:26 AM    from midori:	still no strong p refs ...
09/16/2008    09:49:32 AM    from JenDeegan:	I think it just means some people can skip alternate meetings and know they're not missing anything.
09/16/2008    09:49:40 AM    from Karen:	I don't reallly mind either way, just commented on the distinction that existed when John ran them
09/16/2008    09:49:41 AM    from Nomi Harris:	They can skip all of them and not miss much. :-)
09/16/2008    09:49:49 AM    from JenDeegan:	:-)
09/16/2008    09:49:53 AM    from midori:	But surely that will soon change! ;)
09/16/2008    09:50:07 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Hey, what are you saying? :-)
09/16/2008    09:50:27 AM    from JenDeegan:	That sounds like a hint that we need to get the agenda written in advance.
09/16/2008    09:50:31 AM    from midori:	(k idding!)
09/16/2008    09:50:33 AM    from JenDeegan:	We do ramble a bit.
09/16/2008    09:51:05 AM    from Nomi Harris:	So Jane's bug was:
09/16/2008    09:51:08 AM    from Nomi Harris:	1. The spell checker doesn't run unless you change the repeated word check config, even though it's supposedly on 2. There are so many words missing from the dictionary it causes a crash when you run a spell check on the definitions.  Don't think we can d
09/16/2008    09:51:19 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Don't think we can do anything about number two, it mostly because GO is so big and contains so many chemical names. We should fix number 1 before release though."
09/16/2008    09:51:31 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I have now observed #1.
09/16/2008    09:51:34 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I will fix that.
09/16/2008    09:51:58 AM    from JenDeegan:	we were planning to get one person to do the dictionary file and make it available for everyone, but we haven't done it.
09/16/2008    09:51:59 AM    from Nomi Harris:	For #2, my OE doesn't crash, but it does find thousands of spelling errors in GO.
09/16/2008    09:52:09 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I'm thinking I need to cap the # of errors it shows.  What's a good cap?  500?
09/16/2008    09:52:17 AM    from Harold:	lower!
09/16/2008    09:52:42 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Really?  100?  But then you'd always just see the errors for the first chunk of terms and never see the errors for the later ones.
09/16/2008    09:53:07 AM    from JenDeegan:	once we have a dictionary file this shouldn't be a problem.
09/16/2008    09:53:16 AM    from Nomi Harris:	It would be nice if the verification panel had some sort of "show next 100 errors" button
09/16/2008    09:53:19 AM    from Nomi Harris:	but that would be non-trivial.
09/16/2008    09:53:23 AM    from Karen:	We could possibly improve #2 by collecting dictionary files from editors who have added words and at least getting those in
09/16/2008    09:53:25 AM    from Nomi Harris:	A more complete dictionary file would be a good idea.
09/16/2008    09:53:34 AM    from Harold:	I only "fix" the ones that I am working on anyways
09/16/2008    09:53:42 AM    from JenDeegan:	shall I put that file on my list?
09/16/2008    09:53:50 AM    from Harold:	Actually Karen that is a good idea
09/16/2008    09:53:50 AM    from JenDeegan:	I could try to do it this week.
09/16/2008    09:53:50 AM    from Tanya:	me too, I just ignore the rest
09/16/2008    09:53:53 AM    from Tanya:	(bad curator)
09/16/2008    09:54:01 AM    from Nomi Harris:	That's not bad, it's reasonable.
09/16/2008    09:54:15 AM    from Harold:	Hey, they're not MY spelling errors; they aren't even errors!
09/16/2008    09:54:17 AM    from David OS:	I've been building up my library file.  Perhaps worth pooling?
09/16/2008    09:54:21 AM    from midori:	It's realistic, whatever else it may me
09/16/2008    09:54:24 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Jen, how about if everyone sends you their dictionary?
09/16/2008    09:54:27 AM    from midori:	... er. may BE
09/16/2008    09:54:27 AM    from JenDeegan:	or would it be possible to have an 'add all to disctionary' button?
09/16/2008    09:54:29 AM    from Karen:	I use OE2 for all my browsing and will add things in areas where I'm sure it's correct
09/16/2008    09:54:31 AM    from Nomi Harris:	You can then do this:
09/16/2008    09:54:56 AM    from Nomi Harris:	cat dictionary* | sort | uniq >newdictionary
09/16/2008    09:55:03 AM    from JenDeegan:	I have some software that would merge mutiple disctionaries.
09/16/2008    09:55:08 AM    from JenDeegan:	yes, or that. :-)
09/16/2008    09:55:15 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Isn't that much simpler?
09/16/2008    09:55:17 AM    from JenDeegan:	spelling very odd there. :-)
09/16/2008    09:55:32 AM    from JenDeegan:	it's all good
09/16/2008    09:55:38 AM    from Harold:	We could post the combined dictionary to the site so others could make use of it
09/16/2008    09:55:51 AM    from JenDeegan:	would an 'add all to dictionary' button be hard to write?
09/16/2008    09:55:52 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Why can't we just commit it to the OE repository?
09/16/2008    09:55:59 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Add all what?
09/16/2008    09:56:06 AM    from Harold:	That's what I mean, the OE repository
09/16/2008    09:56:12 AM    from JenDeegan:	all unrecognised words.
09/16/2008    09:56:31 AM    from JenDeegan:	to be used for people loading new ontologies, who are certain that they are all well spelled.
09/16/2008    09:56:35 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Jen, it would be possible, not completely trivial but not super-hard.
09/16/2008    09:56:38 AM    from Karen:	I don't know that I'd really want to have it add all unrecognized words, that would add actual spelling errors to the dicitonary
09/16/2008    09:56:58 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Harold, once the new expanded dictionary is committed, it will appear automatically in future OE releases.
09/16/2008    09:56:59 AM    from Amina:	Yeah what about the actual errors Jen
09/16/2008    09:57:05 AM    from Amina:	Those would be hard to detect
09/16/2008    09:57:16 AM    from JenDeegan:	only if we have spelling errors in the ontology, which naturally we don't.
09/16/2008    09:57:23 AM    from Harold:	I yah
09/16/2008    09:57:24 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Because you guys are perfect. :-)
09/16/2008    09:57:26 AM    from Amina:	In that case it makes sense
09/16/2008    09:57:29 AM    from JenDeegan:	also the file could then be checked by a technical spell checker
09/16/2008    09:57:35 AM    from JenDeegan:	:-)
09/16/2008    09:57:52 AM    from JenDeegan:	I'm just thinking it might be better than my clicking 'add' a billion times.
09/16/2008    09:57:54 AM    from Amina:	Sounds like a useful feature to add then
09/16/2008    09:57:56 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I'm running a spellcheck on GO now
09/16/2008    09:58:18 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I'm thinking I can save the errors as a file and write a little perl script to add the missing words to the dictionary.
09/16/2008    09:58:23 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I'll see if I can do that quickly today.
09/16/2008    09:58:31 AM    from JenDeegan:	that would be extremely kind of you.
09/16/2008    09:58:57 AM    from Harold:	8-) we could always run it through Thunderbird's spell checker for laughs
09/16/2008    09:58:58 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I don't want you to click "add" a billion times and get RSI. :-)
09/16/2008    09:59:07 AM    from JenDeegan:	thanks :-)
09/16/2008    09:59:19 AM    from Harold:	MGI -> magi
09/16/2008    09:59:20 AM    from Tanya:	maybe we could hire a monkey
09/16/2008    09:59:28 AM    from Tanya:	I hear they work for bananas
09/16/2008    09:59:42 AM    from JenDeegan:	we should also post the file that has the words that can be written twice in a row.
09/16/2008    09:59:44 AM    from JenDeegan:	I will do that.
09/16/2008    09:59:55 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Harold, why did you say "MGI -> magi"?
09/16/2008    09:59:58 AM    from JenDeegan:	shall I put it on the wiki or on OBO-Edit?
09/16/2008    10:00:13 AM    from Nomi Harris:	The twice-in-a-row thing is problematic because the string is broken into tokens before it's checked
09/16/2008    10:00:21 AM    from midori:	I took it to be a spell checker suggestion
09/16/2008    10:00:38 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Allowing repeated words separated by punctuation would require a different approach.
09/16/2008    10:00:56 AM    from JenDeegan:	no, I mean just the ones that we currently detect.
09/16/2008    10:01:10 AM    from JenDeegan:	you know where it lets us add to the list those words that can be repeated.
09/16/2008    10:01:13 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Where's the current list?
09/16/2008    10:01:23 AM    from JenDeegan:	currently when we nuke the config directory that file gets lost.
09/16/2008    10:01:32 AM    from JenDeegan:	it must be in the config file somewhere.
09/16/2008    10:01:37 AM    from JenDeegan:	I could fish it out and post it.
09/16/2008    10:02:06 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Ok
09/16/2008    10:02:12 AM    from JenDeegan:	great
09/16/2008    10:02:23 AM    from JenDeegan:	shall I put it in the oboedit install or on the wiki?
09/16/2008    10:02:29 AM    from JenDeegan:	or even cvs?
09/16/2008    10:02:34 AM    from Nomi Harris:	svn
09/16/2008    10:02:37 AM    from JenDeegan:	ok
09/16/2008    10:02:39 AM    from JenDeegan:	thanks
09/16/2008    10:02:45 AM    from JenDeegan:	any particular place?
09/16/2008    10:02:46 AM    from Nomi Harris:	But it should also be included in the install
09/16/2008    10:02:58 AM    from Nomi Harris:	It should be analogous to dictionary.dict
09/16/2008    10:03:08 AM    from JenDeegan:	okay, I'll have a look.
09/16/2008    10:03:22 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Which is in src/org/oboedit/resources/dictionary.dict
09/16/2008    10:03:27 AM    from JenDeegan:	ta.
09/16/2008    10:03:29 AM    from Nomi Harris:	So the repeated-word file should go there.
09/16/2008    10:03:37 AM    from JenDeegan:	good plan.
09/16/2008    10:03:38 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Then it will be included in the jar automatically.
09/16/2008    10:03:49 AM    from JenDeegan:	great
09/16/2008    10:04:18 AM    from Nomi Harris:	But we need to make sure it's called the right thing so the OE code knows to look for it.
09/16/2008    10:04:37 AM    from Tanya:	Is this the appropriate time to show some weird behavior in OE2 b49?
09/16/2008    10:04:59 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Sure
09/16/2008    10:05:13 AM    from Tanya:	Let me summarize briefly
09/16/2008    10:05:17 AM    from Tanya:	I load up the ontology
09/16/2008    10:05:34 AM    from Tanya:	I have a term renderer set up that Chris uses to point out terms with intersections.
09/16/2008    10:05:40 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Uh oh
09/16/2008    10:05:41 AM    from Tanya:	(I'll point to that)
09/16/2008    10:05:48 AM    from Tanya:	when I turn the semantic parser on
09/16/2008    10:05:54 AM    from Tanya:	some term names get truncated.
09/16/2008    10:07:23 AM    from Tanya:	Did you see that?
09/16/2008    10:07:23 AM    from midori:	yup
09/16/2008    10:07:29 AM    from Tanya:	OK, demo over.
09/16/2008    10:07:43 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Weird!
09/16/2008    10:07:45 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I saw that.
09/16/2008    10:07:46 AM    from Tanya:	Very.
09/16/2008    10:07:50 AM    from Harold:	it was instaneous!
09/16/2008    10:07:52 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Did you file a bug report?
09/16/2008    10:07:54 AM    from Tanya:	Yes.
09/16/2008    10:07:56 AM    from Tanya:	No, not yet.
09/16/2008    10:08:09 AM    from Tanya:	It happened in 48 and I hadn't checked 49
09/16/2008    10:08:09 AM    from midori:	It might be the same as this
09/16/2008    10:08:17 AM    from Tanya:	yet to see if it was still happening.
09/16/2008    10:08:21 AM    from midori:	https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2053394&group_id=36855&atid=418257
09/16/2008    10:08:32 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Amina, didn't you fix some bug having to do with term names being truncated?
09/16/2008    10:09:00 AM    from Amina:	Um - don't think so
09/16/2008    10:09:10 AM    from Nomi Harris:	midori, do you think that's the same bug as Tanya's?
09/16/2008    10:09:56 AM    from midori:	I can't be sure because I haven't done exactly what Tanya did (haven't tried the semantic parser at all, for one thing). But the symptoms are similar.
09/16/2008    10:10:11 AM    from midori:	Set up a renderer and see truncated terms.
09/16/2008    10:10:18 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Right.
09/16/2008    10:10:38 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Maybe Tanya should add her bug as a comment on midori's bug, and we should up the priority.
09/16/2008    10:10:56 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Or, if it's posted as a separate bug, be sure to reference midori's bug.
09/16/2008    10:11:04 AM    from Amina:	I can look into this today - I'll be working on a related issue
09/16/2008    10:11:14 AM    from midori:	yes, I put it as low priority because there's an easy fix in the OTE-specific renderer context
09/16/2008    10:11:27 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Tanya, did you try midori's fix?
09/16/2008    10:11:43 AM    from Tanya:	I was trying this out as Chris was suggesting it as a way to help with QC of the regulation terms.
09/16/2008    10:12:01 AM    from Tanya:	I just tried what I think was Midori's fix and either I'm misinterpreting her description
09/16/2008    10:12:05 AM    from Tanya:	or it doesn't work.
09/16/2008    10:12:41 AM    from midori:	My fix may not be available for the semantic parser incarnation of the bug.
09/16/2008    10:12:42 AM    from Tanya:	Opening and closing the config interface doesn't do anything.
09/16/2008    10:12:44 AM    from Amina:	Tanya could you also report the details of the renderer
09/16/2008    10:12:59 AM    from Amina:	I'd like to replicate the problem
09/16/2008    10:13:20 AM    from midori:	It does fix if the terms were truncated by a renderer added in the config interfface in the first place
09/16/2008    10:13:30 AM    from Tanya:	Sure.
09/16/2008    10:13:40 AM    from Tanya:	OK, here's a silly question which must be very easy to manage.
09/16/2008    10:13:43 AM    from Tanya:	answer.
09/16/2008    10:13:46 AM    from Tanya:	argh
09/16/2008    10:14:04 AM    from Tanya:	If I click on the Semantic Parser Manager.
09/16/2008    10:14:09 AM    from Tanya:	and tick the box
09/16/2008    10:14:14 AM    from Tanya:	as you saw me do in the demo
09/16/2008    10:14:21 AM    from Tanya:	but don't do anything with the Reasoner Manager
09/16/2008    10:14:35 AM    from Tanya:	am I doing the right thing?
09/16/2008    10:14:50 AM    from Nomi Harris:	No idea
09/16/2008    10:14:54 AM    from Tanya:	Anybody?
09/16/2008    10:14:57 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I don't know anything about the Semantic Parser Manager.
09/16/2008    10:14:59 AM    from Nomi Harris:	We need Chris.
09/16/2008    10:15:02 AM    from David OS:	what're you trying to achieve?
09/16/2008    10:15:14 AM    from Tanya:	:)
09/16/2008    10:15:20 AM    from JenDeegan:	surely you need the reasoner on?
09/16/2008    10:15:26 AM    from Tanya:	Following Chris' instructions.
09/16/2008    10:15:31 AM    from Tanya:	Right
09/16/2008    10:15:38 AM    from Tanya:	so if the Reasoner is not on
09/16/2008    10:15:50 AM    from Tanya:	then what does ticking the box in the SemanticParser Manager do?
09/16/2008    10:16:08 AM    from JenDeegan:	I thought it added some relationships or something
09/16/2008    10:16:14 AM    from midori:	I'm with Nomi - we need Chris
09/16/2008    10:16:16 AM    from Tanya:	I suppose they're independent?
09/16/2008    10:16:46 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Sorry, no idea.
09/16/2008    10:16:59 AM    from Tanya:	Anyway, I will open a bug report about the behavior I observed
09/16/2008    10:17:05 AM    from Tanya:	with details on how to reproduce it.
09/16/2008    10:17:13 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Thanks.
09/16/2008    10:17:22 AM    from Nomi Harris:	And we did all see it, so we'll know you're not just imagining it. :-)
09/16/2008    10:17:30 AM    from Tanya:	Thanks, Midori. :)
09/16/2008    10:17:42 AM    from Harold:	I know that one!
09/16/2008    10:17:51 AM    from Nomi Harris:	?
09/16/2008    10:18:06 AM    from Harold:	eg, the scrolling bug!
09/16/2008    10:18:34 AM    from Nomi Harris:	I'm sure that no one is actually making up their strange bugs, but unless we have enough info to reproduce the problem, we can't fix it.
09/16/2008    10:18:54 AM    from Nomi Harris:	For the scrolling one, I pestered midori to give me more info until finally I was able to see it for myself.
09/16/2008    10:18:57 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Then I was able to fix it quickly.
09/16/2008    10:19:05 AM    from midori:	took me a while to figure out what to provide for that one
09/16/2008    10:19:27 AM    from midori:	often I do things without being fully conscious of it ... muscle memory
09/16/2008    10:19:40 AM    from Harold:	it's more weird when it happens once and then goes away so you can't demo it; then it comes back!
09/16/2008    10:19:59 AM    from Harold:	but we all saw this one!
09/16/2008    10:20:00 AM    from JenDeegan:	Jane found a tiny picture of a dog in the dbxref field today.
09/16/2008    10:20:07 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Like the way your car stops making that funny noise when you bring it to the repair place...
09/16/2008    10:20:09 AM    from JenDeegan:	but it won't be back.
09/16/2008    10:20:10 AM    from Nomi Harris:	A tiny picture of a dog?!
09/16/2008    10:20:15 AM    from Harold:	what!?
09/16/2008    10:20:17 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Did she get a screenshot?
09/16/2008    10:20:20 AM    from JenDeegan:	she just upgraded office.
09/16/2008    10:20:26 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Too bad it wasn't an image of the Virgin Mary.
09/16/2008    10:20:29 AM    from JenDeegan:	I'm not sure. It was extremely funny though.
09/16/2008    10:20:33 AM    from JenDeegan:	:-)
09/16/2008    10:20:47 AM    from Tanya:	we could have sold that version on eBay
09/16/2008    10:20:50 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Exactly!
09/16/2008    10:20:59 AM    from Harold:	which dbxref? I want to see!
09/16/2008    10:21:05 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Me too!
09/16/2008    10:21:12 AM    from Tanya:	and then Nomi's salary would be covered!
09/16/2008    10:21:16 AM    from JenDeegan:	I'll ask if she still had it.
09/16/2008    10:21:58 AM    from JenDeegan:	shall we wrap up now?
09/16/2008    10:22:02 AM    from Harold:	Maybe Bill Gates has his eye on oboedit!
09/16/2008    10:22:12 AM    from JenDeegan:	I should think he does :-)
09/16/2008    10:22:17 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Does anyone else have anything to bring up?
09/16/2008    10:22:24 AM    from JenDeegan:	nope
09/16/2008    10:22:26 AM    from Harold:	no;
09/16/2008    10:22:28 AM    from midori:	Not just now
09/16/2008    10:22:42 AM    from Karen:	nope
09/16/2008    10:22:44 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Ok
09/16/2008    10:22:48 AM    from Nomi Harris:	Bye all
09/16/2008    10:22:52 AM    from midori:	bye
09/16/2008    10:22:53 AM    from JenDeegan:	bye
09/16/2008    10:22:56 AM    from Amina:	bye all
09/16/2008    10:22:56 AM    from Harold:	Good bye
09/16/2008    10:22:57 AM    from Karen:	bye
09/16/2008    10:22:59 AM    from David OS:	taraa