OE Webex 25Mar08

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
March 25, 2008	    4:36:30 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Hey, Jen.  Did you see that I made the search columns adjustable?
March 25, 2008	    4:36:34 PM	    from David OS:	Hiya
March 25, 2008	    4:37:34 PM	    from Jane Lomax:	Hiya Nomi
March 25, 2008	    4:37:35 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Did anyone try b34 yet?  Peter Midford encountered problems with it.  At first I thought it was a problem with the new oe-command-line script, but he had the same issues when he launched OE the normal way (double-clicking the icon).
March 25, 2008	    4:37:50 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	(Jen, if you said anything, I didn't hear it.)
March 25, 2008	    4:37:56 PM	    from Jane Lomax:	I've been using it today - seems okay
March 25, 2008	    4:38:09 PM	    from midori:	I've started it up and loaded GO. That's almost all I've done with it.
March 25, 2008	    4:38:15 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	He's on a Mac.  I'm not sure why he's having trouble.
March 25, 2008	    4:38:25 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	The specific problem he reported was that he couldn't get the config window to close,
March 25, 2008	    4:38:39 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	but he sent me the stdout and it was full of errors.
March 25, 2008	    4:38:55 PM	    from David OS:	I've been using it too.  Crashed once - but I think that was just an example of the occasional crashes casued by the graph editor. 
March 25, 2008	    4:39:02 PM	    from midori:	I'm on a Mac too, but with 10.4 (Peter says he has 10.5), and my config window opened and closed normally. I didn't change anything in the config, tho.
March 25, 2008	    4:39:17 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Does Peter work with you?
March 25, 2008	    4:39:22 PM	    from melissaH:	working ok for me today, except no new terms still.
March 25, 2008	    4:39:25 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	hi, here now. Just downloading
March 25, 2008	    4:39:42 PM	    from David OS:	Didn't see anything weird with config on linux with b34
March 25, 2008	    4:39:46 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Melissa says that when she creates a new term, she can't edit its name--the change doesn't stick.
March 25, 2008	    4:39:54 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Has anyone else encountered that problem?
March 25, 2008	    4:40:10 PM	    from midori:	Not in the last beta; haven't tried in b34
March 25, 2008	    4:40:11 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	That seems so major that I'd expect to have heard other reports of it.  (I can't recreate the problem.)
March 25, 2008	    4:40:34 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	This isn't new to b34.  She's been having that problem for a while.
March 25, 2008	    4:40:46 PM	    from melissaH:	I'm good at breaking things, though....
March 25, 2008	    4:40:52 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Melissa, I would suggest that you try renaming your .oboeditbeta (rather than removing it completely--that way you can get it back if you want it)
March 25, 2008	    4:40:58 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	and relaunching and see if that solves the problem.
March 25, 2008	    4:41:18 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	If it does, and if there are settings in your .oboeditbeta that you want to preserve, I can help you sort that out.
March 25, 2008	    4:41:21 PM	    from midori:	I haven't had that problem in the last several betas. Got some of my own special Nomi-can't-reproduce bugs, though!
March 25, 2008	    4:41:35 PM	    from melissaH:	ok, will do.
March 25, 2008	    4:41:57 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	midori, I think the solution is you should visit Berkeley and then I can look over your shoulder and figure out what's going on.
March 25, 2008	    4:41:57 PM	    from Jane Lomax:	btw - I've found a bug with the verification plugin I think (OE 1 & 2) - is this meeting the place to report it?
March 25, 2008	    4:42:13 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Well, technically, you should report it on the bug tracker.
March 25, 2008	    4:42:26 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	But you can mention it now if you think it might lead to a productive discussion.
March 25, 2008	    4:42:37 PM	    from Jane Lomax:	ok - it might
March 25, 2008	    4:42:42 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	(I'll admit right now that I know nothing about the verification plugin.  And there's already at least one bug report about it.)
March 25, 2008	    4:42:51 PM	    from Jane Lomax:	does anyone use it regularly?
March 25, 2008	    4:43:14 PM	    from Jane Lomax:	because the name redundancy checker seems to have stopped working
March 25, 2008	    4:43:23 PM	    from midori:	I have a few checks that run on eveny save, if that counts.
March 25, 2008	    4:43:25 PM	    from David OS:	Term name editing works fine for me w/ b34 lunix.
March 25, 2008	    4:43:47 PM	    from Jane Lomax:	there are several terms that share a name with their exact synonym
March 25, 2008	    4:44:05 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	There aren't any changes in b34 that should affect term name editing, so it does sound like that is a Melissa-specific problem (sorry, Melissa!).
March 25, 2008	    4:44:15 PM	    from Jane Lomax:	(this showed up when the UMLS people tried to merge in GO last month)
March 25, 2008	    4:44:22 PM	    from midori:	The name redundancy checker seems to be working for me in OE1, but I don't recall it ever being able to catch when a term had its own name as a synonym.
March 25, 2008	    4:44:35 PM	    from Jane Lomax:	it definitely used to
March 25, 2008	    4:44:43 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Jane, if you can give a specific example of the redundant synonyms when you post your bug report, I'll look into it.
March 25, 2008	    4:44:52 PM	    from Jane Lomax:	will do
March 25, 2008	    4:44:55 PM	    from Jane Lomax:	thanks
March 25, 2008	    4:45:02 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	It's possible that feature was never implemented in OE2.
March 25, 2008	    4:45:32 PM	    from Jane Lomax:	well, it looks like it's also broken in OE1
March 25, 2008	    4:45:33 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Hi again, midori.
March 25, 2008	    4:45:39 PM	    from melissaH:	question, is OEb34 doing an autosave now?
March 25, 2008	    4:45:52 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	If it's also "broken" in OE1, then I suspect that that means that it was never implemented, period.
March 25, 2008	    4:46:01 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	So perhaps it should be added to the Feature Requests tracker.
March 25, 2008	    4:46:09 PM	    from midori:	Guess I'll have to tell the nice people at webex support that their latest suggestion didn't help.
March 25, 2008	    4:46:13 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	It doesn't sound like it should be hard to implement, though.  I can look at it soon if it's important.
March 25, 2008	    4:46:21 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Melissa, I haven't changed the autosave behavior.
March 25, 2008	    4:46:24 PM	    from Jane Lomax:	cool
March 25, 2008	    4:46:31 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	I'm not sure exactly what you're asking about autosave.
March 25, 2008	    4:47:07 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	I can change the default autosaving behavior if people are finding it annoying.
March 25, 2008	    4:47:19 PM	    from melissaH:	something just flashed up, and now my ontology isn't current with the svn, was playing around with b34 with new terms... this is the behavior of phenote- maybe its borrowing something? I'll check further...
March 25, 2008	    4:47:24 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Like, if every 20 min is too frequent, or if saving the autosaved backups for a week is too much.
March 25, 2008	    4:47:39 PM	    from Jane Lomax:	I think it's ok as is
March 25, 2008	    4:47:49 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	I don't think OE automatically updates the ontology from the svn.
March 25, 2008	    4:48:06 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	(Phenote does.)
March 25, 2008	    4:48:30 PM	    from Karen Christie:	Every 20 minutes is great when I'm editing, when I'm browsing, I'd just like a quick way to completely turn the autosave off, but I already submitted a feature request
March 25, 2008	    4:48:47 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Yes, I saw that.
March 25, 2008	    4:48:47 PM	    from melissaH:	no-no, just that my version is no longer current. I guess I didn't even realize that we had autosave- OE1 doesn't have this behavior and I have yet to really edit in OE2, so my bad. just need to be more carefule I suppose.
March 25, 2008	    4:49:03 PM	    from melissaH:	yes me too. 
March 25, 2008	    4:49:14 PM	    from David OS:	I thought autosave just saved backups in its own odd format and location - rather than saving over loaded copy of ontology.
March 25, 2008	    4:49:36 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	*sigh* I'm back
March 25, 2008	    4:49:50 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	I got booted right after I said "I saw that request".  Did I miss anything?
March 25, 2008	    4:50:11 PM	    from David OS:	Just saying "I thought autosave just saved backups in its own odd format and location - rather than saving over loaded copy of ontology."
March 25, 2008	    4:50:20 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Yes, that's correct.
March 25, 2008	    4:50:31 PM	    from melissaH:	ok, probably something I did then. 
March 25, 2008	    4:50:54 PM	    from melissaH:	(good!)
March 25, 2008	    4:51:02 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	So I was glad that removing the "transitive links only" filter was not controversial--I thought it might be.
March 25, 2008	    4:51:25 PM	    from melissaH:	I think those of us that regularly need it off are used to turning it on and off.
March 25, 2008	    4:51:43 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Great.  And THANK YOU for offering to write the documentation about how to turn it back on--that would be great!
March 25, 2008	    4:52:29 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	You saw my note about removing your .oboeditebeta/filter_prefs.xml in order to let the new default (turn off that filter) take effect, right?
March 25, 2008	    4:52:40 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	yes
March 25, 2008	    4:52:51 PM	    from melissaH:	yep. I'll add something to the doc for that too.
March 25, 2008	    4:53:05 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Thanks.
March 25, 2008	    4:53:20 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Did everyone understand the deal with the new reasoner chooser?
March 25, 2008	    4:53:38 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	midori and possibly others have been complaining about reasoner slowness.  You can now choose the older, faster reasoner
March 25, 2008	    4:53:39 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	just taking a look
March 25, 2008	    4:53:51 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	instead of the newer slower one.  However, the older one will be phased out at some point.
March 25, 2008	    4:54:04 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	yes it looks easy
March 25, 2008	    4:54:10 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Hopefully Chris will be able to speed up the new one.
March 25, 2008	    4:54:13 PM	    from David OS:	Have been using old one today. Much faster.
March 25, 2008	    4:54:25 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	Nomi, are you coming to the consortium meeting?
March 25, 2008	    4:54:32 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Just keep in mind the old one can't deal with the "regulates" relationships.
March 25, 2008	    4:54:39 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Jen, I wasn't planning to.
March 25, 2008	    4:54:47 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	rightio
March 25, 2008	    4:54:54 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	shame, would be nice to meet you
March 25, 2008	    4:54:56 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	I was thinking maybe I should, but we have long-standing weekend plans for that weekend
March 25, 2008	    4:54:56 PM	    from midori:	I think so ... but where's the selector? My reasoner manager looks the same as before ...
March 25, 2008	    4:55:06 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	but also good way to let you see bugs that are only on our laptops
March 25, 2008	    4:55:18 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	that's fine if you're busy.
March 25, 2008	    4:55:26 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	so I couldn't get there before the afternoon of Monday the 21st--would that be worth it?
March 25, 2008	    4:55:44 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	I know, it would be helpful to see your bugs in person (not to mention meeting all of you!).
March 25, 2008	    4:55:50 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	that's when I arrive
March 25, 2008	    4:56:09 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	the consortium meeting is 22-23rd
March 25, 2008	    4:56:22 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Oh, really?  If other people aren't arriving until Monday, maybe I should try to come.  I thought it started Sunday but I guess that's a different meeting.
March 25, 2008	    4:56:25 PM	    from midori:	that's Tuesday & wednesday
March 25, 2008	    4:56:39 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	yes it's the ref genome one that's before that
March 25, 2008	    4:56:39 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Are all of you going to be there?
March 25, 2008	    4:56:45 PM	    from midori:	(there's a Reference Genomes meeting on the Sunday & Monday)
March 25, 2008	    4:56:52 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	I just wondered because John fixed a bug on my platform last consortium meeting
March 25, 2008	    4:56:56 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	I was the only one that had it
March 25, 2008	    4:57:05 PM	    from midori:	I'll be there, but I won't have a computer that can reasonably be expected to run OE.
March 25, 2008	    4:57:18 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	What, it won't run on your iPhone?
March 25, 2008	    4:57:34 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	or I could just tell you that I run xp home edition, and not professional, I think that was all he needed to know.
March 25, 2008	    4:57:46 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	:)
March 25, 2008	    4:58:03 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	John had a Windows machine, so he could fix stuff like that.  I don't have access to one at the moment (though we're trying to get one here).
March 25, 2008	    4:58:31 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	he developed on xp professional though. I run hopme edition. I think that may be why the gui looks odd on comboboxes
March 25, 2008	    4:58:32 PM	    from David OS:	Can I bring up up a aesthetic point about b34?
March 25, 2008	    4:58:39 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	sure
March 25, 2008	    4:58:45 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Anyway, I will talk to Suzi about whether I should attend the meeting.  When I joined the OE project a few months ago, I was just here as a temporary fill-in, but this is getting to be a rather on-going temporary position...
March 25, 2008	    4:58:53 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	David, yes, go ahead.
March 25, 2008	    4:58:59 PM	    from melissaH:	Nomi, I won't be at the meeting, but I am coming to berkeley beginning of next month.
March 25, 2008	    4:59:26 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Let me know your dates, melissa, and we can meet and look at some of your melissa-specific bugs.
March 25, 2008	    4:59:35 PM	    from David OS:	The new pale yellow arrows for part_of links are really hard to see on a white background.
March 25, 2008	    5:00:05 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Hmm.  I made them lighter to contrast with the new orange regulates links
March 25, 2008	    5:00:08 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	but if they are too hard to see, then that's not a good solution.
March 25, 2008	    5:00:17 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	I am open to suggestions for the colors.
March 25, 2008	    5:00:30 PM	    from midori:	I ahve to agree (despite my usual tendency to stay out of color-scheme debates).
March 25, 2008	    5:00:38 PM	    from David OS:	I'm not too fussy, as long as they're dark.
March 25, 2008	    5:00:55 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	How about if I restore part_of to its orangey-yellow and make regulates purple?
March 25, 2008	    5:00:58 PM	    from melissaH:	I like having the icons the same colors as the links.
March 25, 2008	    5:01:10 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	(I'll have to check if the red/green/yellow regulates icons still show up against the purple)
March 25, 2008	    5:01:20 PM	    from midori:	I'm with David ... anything with enough contrast is fine.
March 25, 2008	    5:01:31 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	melissa, I can't right now make the links the same color as the icons because (1) there are three different color regulates icons, and
March 25, 2008	    5:01:36 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	we could just have the lines black and the icons do the discriminating. This is going to be a pain for the colour blind people
March 25, 2008	    5:01:43 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	(2) the arrow shape doesn't show up if the background's the same color.
March 25, 2008	    5:02:04 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	I really liked the black arrows and black lines
March 25, 2008	    5:02:09 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	I thought that was enough already
March 25, 2008	    5:02:25 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	I am trying to stay out of the icon decision.  Whatever you guys want is fine with me.
March 25, 2008	    5:03:07 PM	    from Karen Christie:	I don't care much about which color the lines are, but I do notice them better when the different relationships have different colors, not just all black for everything
March 25, 2008	    5:03:26 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	how about if all regulates relationships have the same colour?
March 25, 2008	    5:03:31 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	like blue or something
March 25, 2008	    5:03:38 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Blue is the is_a color
March 25, 2008	    5:03:42 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	oh
March 25, 2008	    5:03:47 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	or another colour
March 25, 2008	    5:03:54 PM	    from melissaH:	and the color of the part of icon. sigh.
March 25, 2008	    5:04:18 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	frantically loading file...
March 25, 2008	    5:04:42 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	You guys just let me know what colors and icons you want and I'll put them in.
March 25, 2008	    5:04:44 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Ok?
March 25, 2008	    5:05:12 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	maybe we need to mull it over for a bit longer
March 25, 2008	    5:05:20 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	That's fine.
March 25, 2008	    5:05:20 PM	    from David OS:	Sorry, I didn't want to start a big colour scheme debate.  I really don't care too much - as long as they are dark enough to contrast with the background.
March 25, 2008	    5:05:22 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	it hasn't been long since we got them
March 25, 2008	    5:05:36 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	I'll try purple for the regulates links and send out a screenshot, but I'm open to other solutions.
March 25, 2008	    5:05:41 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	does anybody else want the three regulates icons to be three different colours?
March 25, 2008	    5:05:47 PM	    from David OS:	OK
March 25, 2008	    5:05:48 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	About the GO meeting, are people staying the night of the 23rd?
March 25, 2008	    5:06:02 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	I am
March 25, 2008	    5:06:13 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Are there events that evening?
March 25, 2008	    5:06:27 PM	    from midori:	Some are, some aren't, depending on when they could get flights. All of the UK-based people are staying; we'll probably have to make our own fun.
March 25, 2008	    5:06:44 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	are we meant to see regulates relationships in the graph viewer?
March 25, 2008	    5:07:02 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	You will see them if you turn off the 'is transitive" filter
March 25, 2008	    5:07:04 PM	    from midori:	I do
March 25, 2008	    5:07:46 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	strangely, I don't 
March 25, 2008	    5:08:02 PM	    from midori:	do you see them in the tree editor?
March 25, 2008	    5:08:02 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Are you sure you turned that filter off?  It's probably set in your .oboeditbeta/filter_prefs.xml
March 25, 2008	    5:08:15 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	midori, maybe you can help Jen get that working?
March 25, 2008	    5:08:24 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	I deleted the whole of oboeditbeta
March 25, 2008	    5:08:29 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	David, I'm looking into your dangling refs issues.
March 25, 2008	    5:08:30 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	I'll work on it
March 25, 2008	    5:08:43 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	The problem is that the dangling refs generate objects that are not like normal term objects.
March 25, 2008	    5:08:57 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	They are a completely different class, which creates problems, and they lack names, which creates other problems.
March 25, 2008	    5:09:34 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Personally, I would like them to be more like normal objects, but Chris feels strongly that they must be ostracized and presented as the freaks that they are.
March 25, 2008	    5:10:05 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	would it make sense to release oboedit at a different stage of the week so we have more time to test before the meeting? Say wednesdays? I never get any time to take a look before the meeting
March 25, 2008	    5:10:29 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Yeah, I've been feeling bad about doing the releases on Mondays,
March 25, 2008	    5:10:39 PM	    from melissaH:	oh thats a good idea. 
March 25, 2008	    5:10:39 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	the thing is, I always want to get as many fixes as possible into the new release,
March 25, 2008	    5:10:43 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	so I end up doing it at the last minute.
March 25, 2008	    5:10:44 PM	    from David OS:	Thanks for looking in to this.  If it is possible to set the dangling refs to be ignored, except for the purposes of editing/display in the text editor?
March 25, 2008	    5:11:16 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	David, no, they can't be "ignored" because they are an abnormal state, and they are branded as such when they are read in.
March 25, 2008	    5:11:21 PM	    from David OS:	...is it possible...
March 25, 2008	    5:11:30 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	I will look into this more, though, and discuss it with Chris.
March 25, 2008	    5:11:54 PM	    from David OS:	OK.  Can you cc me on any e-mails about this with Chris?
March 25, 2008	    5:11:56 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Anyway, about the release date, I will try to do the releases earlier so that you guys have time to try it out before the Tuesday meeting.
March 25, 2008	    5:12:08 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	thanks
March 25, 2008	    5:12:18 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	David, yes, but I was thinking of actually (gasp!) talking to Chris in person, since he is in the same office as me.
March 25, 2008	    5:12:26 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	oooooo
March 25, 2008	    5:12:50 PM	    from midori:	what a concept!
March 25, 2008	    5:13:03 PM	    from David OS:	:) OK.  Guess I'll ask him about it myself - I'd like to understand the issues a little better.
March 25, 2008	    5:13:04 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Other issues I plan to look into are the delete bugs and the redraw issues (components not redrawing automatically when things change in other components)
March 25, 2008	    5:13:26 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Hey, one more question about the timing of the GO meeting:  are there any events the evening of the 21st?
March 25, 2008	    5:13:29 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	should I see regulates in the graph viewer or just the graph editor? I see it in the graph editor
March 25, 2008	    5:14:21 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Jen, I didn't test the graph viewer with the regulates relationship.
March 25, 2008	    5:14:31 PM	    from Karen Christie:	which one is the graph viewer?
March 25, 2008	    5:14:32 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	To be honest, I don't understand the graph viewer very well.
March 25, 2008	    5:14:33 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	it's there large as life
March 25, 2008	    5:14:41 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	It's what used to be called the Graph DAG Viewer
March 25, 2008	    5:14:48 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	but we renamed it because it doesn't show DAGs
March 25, 2008	    5:14:55 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	it's like the graph editor but you can't edit in it
March 25, 2008	    5:15:08 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	It's kind of like the graph editor, but it shows paths to root, right?
March 25, 2008	    5:15:10 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	also very like the graphviz viewer but with different underlying code
March 25, 2008	    5:15:14 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	yes
March 25, 2008	    5:15:32 PM	    from Karen Christie:	Hmm, must not be using that at all, as I have no idea which component this is
March 25, 2008	    5:15:46 PM	    from midori:	I'm only seeing is_a  and part_of in the graph viewer; it's the graph editor where I see regulates (sorry for earlier mixup)
March 25, 2008	    5:16:02 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	ah! I got regulates in the graph viewer now
March 25, 2008	    5:16:09 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	What did you have to do, Jen?
March 25, 2008	    5:16:17 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	hang on I'll check
March 25, 2008	    5:16:37 PM	    from midori:	yep, working now
March 25, 2008	    5:17:02 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	orange is good
March 25, 2008	    5:17:04 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	:-)
March 25, 2008	    5:17:06 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	for links
March 25, 2008	    5:17:40 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	would it be possible to try to make the regulates icons bigger in the ontology editor panel?
March 25, 2008	    5:17:41 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	What if I make part_of purple, then?  Would that be confusing?  Are people used to part_of being yellow-orange?
March 25, 2008	    5:18:02 PM	    from midori:	I've still got maroon. Is there some config thing I have to change or delete?
March 25, 2008	    5:18:15 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Jen, all the icons are scaled the same way; I don't think it would make sense to add special code to scale the regulates icons differently.
March 25, 2008	    5:18:21 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	how about part of royal blue and is_a dark blue?
March 25, 2008	    5:18:31 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	That's pretty subtle.
March 25, 2008	    5:18:36 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	the icons seem very small to me. Oh wait, deja vu.
March 25, 2008	    5:18:48 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	like the icon colours I meant
March 25, 2008	    5:19:11 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Yeah, we've talked about the icon sizes.
March 25, 2008	    5:19:25 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	I'll send you a screenshot
March 25, 2008	    5:19:26 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	The regulates ones look smaller because the Rs are small because there's more "stuff" going on around the Rs.
March 25, 2008	    5:19:31 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Ok, send me a screenshot.
March 25, 2008	    5:19:31 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	they're problematically small on my sceen
March 25, 2008	    5:19:48 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Hmm.  Maybe you need a bigger screen. :-)
March 25, 2008	    5:19:54 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	possibly
March 25, 2008	    5:19:56 PM	    from midori:	maybe that's because your eyes are better than mine ;)
March 25, 2008	    5:20:03 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	all donations gratefully accepted
March 25, 2008	    5:20:03 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Whose?  Mine?
March 25, 2008	    5:20:08 PM	    from midori:	(so you can get away with a smaller font)
March 25, 2008	    5:20:10 PM	    from midori:	Jen's
March 25, 2008	    5:20:14 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Sorry, Jen, I am not donating any eyes.
March 25, 2008	    5:20:18 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	:-)
March 25, 2008	    5:20:26 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	I could make the font bigger. hadn't thoght of that
March 25, 2008	    5:20:37 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	You mean, the font in the icons?
March 25, 2008	    5:20:43 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	bettter!
March 25, 2008	    5:20:59 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Feel free to fiddle with the icons.  Just send me the revised ones and I'll stick them in OE.
March 25, 2008	    5:20:59 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	regulates icons no longer small hazy blob
March 25, 2008	    5:21:01 PM	    from midori:	I meant the tree editor font, so the icons would scale up with it.
March 25, 2008	    5:21:11 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	yes
March 25, 2008	    5:21:13 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	It worked
March 25, 2008	    5:21:15 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Maybe a session at the GO meeting could be devoted to discussing the regulates icons and colors. :-)
March 25, 2008	    5:21:25 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	yes!
March 25, 2008	    5:21:39 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	that would get some sarky comments
March 25, 2008	    5:22:01 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	my font is really very big now
March 25, 2008	    5:22:10 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	must consider this further...
March 25, 2008	    5:22:22 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Rats, booted again
March 25, 2008	    5:22:28 PM	    from David OS:	"Maybe a session at the GO meeting could be devoted to discussing the regulates icons and colors. :-)" What and take all the fun out of the OEWG .....
March 25, 2008	    5:22:33 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	(Right after I suggested the special GO meeting session)
March 25, 2008	    5:22:46 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Did I miss anything?
March 25, 2008	    5:22:47 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	good idea
March 25, 2008	    5:22:49 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	nope
March 25, 2008	    5:22:52 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	just humour
March 25, 2008	    5:22:56 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Are we done?
March 25, 2008	    5:23:01 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	I mean, with this chat.
March 25, 2008	    5:23:02 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	yes I think so
March 25, 2008	    5:23:05 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	oh one thing
March 25, 2008	    5:23:09 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Yes?
March 25, 2008	    5:23:20 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	if you want to look at the bugs on my OS I could give you control of my eclipse via webex
March 25, 2008	    5:23:27 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	just a thought
March 25, 2008	    5:23:31 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	I'm done noe
March 25, 2008	    5:23:32 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	now
March 25, 2008	    5:23:38 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Do you want to do that now?
March 25, 2008	    5:23:45 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	we could have a go
March 25, 2008	    5:23:46 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	:-)
March 25, 2008	    5:23:48 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Ok
March 25, 2008	    5:23:52 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	great
March 25, 2008	    5:23:55 PM	    from Jen Deegan:	I'll save the chat too
March 25, 2008	    5:24:01 PM	    from midori:	I'll bow out, since I have to get going anyway.
March 25, 2008	    5:24:02 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Thanks!
March 25, 2008	    5:24:06 PM	    from Nomi Harris:	Ok, bye everyone.