OE Webex 7Oct08

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

10/07/2008 09:28:10 AM from Jen Deegan: Hi
10/07/2008 09:28:14 AM from Amina Abdulla: Hi Jen
10/07/2008 09:28:25 AM from Jen Deegan: Hi Amina,how's it going?
10/07/2008 09:28:25 AM from Karen: Hi Jen
10/07/2008 09:28:29 AM from Jen Deegan: Hi Karen.
10/07/2008 09:28:50 AM from Amina Abdulla: going alright Jen - 2 weeks to GO: )
10/07/2008 09:28:55 AM from Jen Deegan: :-)
10/07/2008 09:29:22 AM from Jen Deegan: We had a developer breakthrough today. We figured out that the settings class for OBO-Edit components is a JavaBean.
10/07/2008 09:29:55 AM from Jen Deegan: That will save all sorts of trouble for future config stuff.
10/07/2008 09:29:55 AM from Amina Abdulla: what were you trying to do Jen
10/07/2008 09:30:20 AM from Jen Deegan: I'm working on making the Tree Viewer have its config setting accessed via the wrench icon rather than the big options button.
10/07/2008 09:30:35 AM from Jen Deegan: It's nearly done but there are a coupld of bugs left.
10/07/2008 09:31:20 AM from Jen Deegan: Hi Melissa
10/07/2008 09:32:11 AM from Amina Abdulla: Jen - the TreeViewer would be a good meeting demo once your done
10/07/2008 09:32:11 AM from midori: Hi all
10/07/2008 09:32:17 AM from Amina Abdulla: Hi Midori
10/07/2008 09:32:19 AM from Jen Deegan: Hi Midori
10/07/2008 09:32:35 AM from Jen Deegan: Good idea to demo. I'll do that.
10/07/2008 09:32:36 AM from midori: took me a while to connect (I think 'cos my cvs commit is still running)
10/07/2008 09:33:36 AM from Nomi Harris: I had trouble connecting to WebEx this morning, too. It just hung there for a while and I had to try again.
10/07/2008 09:34:19 AM from Amina Abdulla: That reminds me - svn is undergoing some sort of refactoring and has been really weird lately
10/07/2008 09:34:41 AM from Amina Abdulla: The bug and feature tracker update emails haven't gone through last few days
10/07/2008 09:34:51 AM from Amina Abdulla: I don't see my undate emails atleast
10/07/2008 09:34:56 AM from midori: I haven't done anything with SF svn for a while ... not since before their big move.
10/07/2008 09:35:03 AM from Amina Abdulla: Saw some updates Nomi made yest
10/07/2008 09:35:18 AM from Nomi Harris: You mean to some of the tracker items?
10/07/2008 09:35:28 AM from Amina Abdulla: yeah the tracker emails
10/07/2008 09:35:37 AM from Amina Abdulla: Just wanted to let the editors know
10/07/2008 09:35:55 AM from Nomi Harris: I don't think I've been getting email about tracker updates lately, though I have gotten the "here are the new items today" messages.
10/07/2008 09:36:10 AM from Amina Abdulla: Jen I added comments to some of your requests - I can send that to you on skype after the meeting
10/07/2008 09:36:18 AM from Amina Abdulla: Hi Tanya and Chris
10/07/2008 09:36:18 AM from midori: You're not the only one -- SF had a problem with their mailing lists, and I'm still hearing about people missing tracker mails for items they're monitoring.
10/07/2008 09:36:24 AM from Jen Deegan: Thanks for that.
10/07/2008 09:36:27 AM from Amina Abdulla: should we start - looks like everyone is here
10/07/2008 09:36:44 AM from Chris Mungall: odd, I still get emails from sf on tracker items I'm monitoring
10/07/2008 09:36:59 AM from midori: Those "here are today's items" mails aren't from SourceForge; they're from me, via the awesome power of perl script + cron.
10/07/2008 09:37:22 AM from midori: I don't think everything's going astray, just the odd one here & there.
10/07/2008 09:37:32 AM from Tanya: We've had that happen too.
10/07/2008 09:37:39 AM from Tanya: CLosed items that didn't really close.
10/07/2008 09:37:45 AM from Tanya: comments added that were lost.
10/07/2008 09:38:03 AM from Tanya: SF Twilight Zone
10/07/2008 09:38:06 AM from Amina Abdulla: So I fixed the multiple xps save bug in the Text Editor - works with manual and auto commit
10/07/2008 09:38:49 AM from Amina Abdulla: The "pending edits" pop up is still a issue though as I haven't been able to replicate the bug
10/07/2008 09:39:32 AM from Chris Mungall: We have the option of moving everything en masse from sf to googlecode. But that may be exchanging one set of problems for another..
10/07/2008 09:39:44 AM from Amina Abdulla: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2142711&group_id=36855&atid=418257
10/07/2008 09:39:56 AM from midori: I've just removed my edit.idw file, because Nomi said that helped ... haven't had much chance to see whether it works for me yet.
10/07/2008 09:39:59 AM from Nomi Harris: Did you try my "bad" edit.idw?
10/07/2008 09:40:09 AM from Amina Abdulla: I vote for switching to google code
10/07/2008 09:40:29 AM from Nomi Harris: I vote for staying with SF for now.
10/07/2008 09:40:34 AM from midori: No ... I was getting the nag message anyway, and didn't think of it.
10/07/2008 09:40:55 AM from Nomi Harris: Actually, I meant did Amina try my bad edit.idw, since she wasn't seeing the problem.
10/07/2008 09:40:55 AM from midori: I don't really know googlecode ...
10/07/2008 09:41:04 AM from Nomi Harris: It sounds like you have your own bad edit.idw, midori.
10/07/2008 09:41:15 AM from melissaH: I think for joe user, its nice to have all the obo-related trackers in the same place
10/07/2008 09:41:32 AM from Amina Abdulla: ok - I'm going to leave this for now - if we see more of the pending edits come up when nothing has changed I'll look into it
10/07/2008 09:41:33 AM from Nomi Harris: I still find it very mysterious that edit.idw would affect saving of changes. It should just affect the layout of components.
10/07/2008 09:42:12 AM from midori: I shouldn't have a bad edit.idw any more, but I just chucked it and haven't retested. Hang on, I'll check now.
10/07/2008 09:42:50 AM from Amina Abdulla: So about the email Chris sent out yesterday regarding the built-in relations - does everyone agree
10/07/2008 09:43:37 AM from midori: I never actually use the list of relations in the OTE, so no objection to changing that.
10/07/2008 09:43:52 AM from Tanya: I've learned to ignore those too: )
10/07/2008 09:44:00 AM from Jen Deegan: sounds fine. I use union_of but I can always add it in the file.
10/07/2008 09:44:10 AM from melissaH: yeah, the only reason I look at them is to check the user-defined ones
10/07/2008 09:44:20 AM from Nomi Harris: Did you see my suggestion that the label "Relations" be changed (to "User-defined relations" or something like that)?
10/07/2008 09:44:21 AM from midori: I like Nomi's suggestion to relabel it "user-defined relations"
10/07/2008 09:44:25 AM from midori: snap!
10/07/2008 09:44:30 AM from melissaH: yep- great!
10/07/2008 09:44:42 AM from Amina Abdulla: The cross-products tab in the TextEditor also should not be displaying the built-ins for the Discriminating relations - I'll fix that too
10/07/2008 09:44:46 AM from Chris Mungall: Jen - you can still use union_of, it just wouldn't be listed in the OTE display
10/07/2008 09:45:13 AM from Jen Deegan: Yes that's fine
10/07/2008 09:45:13 AM from Chris Mungall: My only caveat about "user-defined relations" is that it is kind of long for the OTE display
10/07/2008 09:45:28 AM from midori: not in my OTEs!
10/07/2008 09:45:31 AM from Nomi Harris: It's not long compared to many of the terms that will appear in the OTE.
10/07/2008 09:45:45 AM from Chris Mungall: OK
10/07/2008 09:45:50 AM from midori: (seriously, it's still much shorter than a lot of term snames)
10/07/2008 09:47:04 AM from Chris Mungall: Yep. I guess it was more an easthetic length thing.. it's the top level grouping so it should be something basic and hence non-wordy... but this is just me fussing
10/07/2008 09:47:26 AM from Chris Mungall: Also, "defined" is pushing it, since many of these are undefined
10/07/2008 09:47:35 AM from Chris Mungall: in the proper sense of defined
10/07/2008 09:47:53 AM from midori: user-specified, then ?
10/07/2008 09:47:56 AM from Chris Mungall: sure
10/07/2008 09:47:58 AM from Tanya: " User-created relations'?
10/07/2008 09:48:02 AM from Tanya: (typed too slow)
10/07/2008 09:49:18 AM from Chris Mungall: like that too
10/07/2008 09:49:34 AM from Amina Abdulla: Alright - moving on to the GO meeting - I suggested having some time for the OEWG one of the days
10/07/2008 09:49:53 AM from midori: makes sense
10/07/2008 09:50:23 AM from Amina Abdulla: Suzi has that on the agenda - we couldn't decide a time though - whenever the different groups branch out I guess
10/07/2008 09:50:52 AM from Tanya: Do you know when a final agenda might gel? Something with times?
10/07/2008 09:51:06 AM from Tanya: It looks like there's a TON to discuss.
10/07/2008 09:51:22 AM from midori: It's in the PIs' hands ... and yes, I agree, tons
10/07/2008 09:51:24 AM from Nomi Harris: For the OEWG? Or for the whole GO meeting?
10/07/2008 09:51:35 AM from Amina Abdulla: Yeah I'm hoping by next week Tanya
10/07/2008 09:51:37 AM from Tanya: The whole thing.
10/07/2008 09:51:57 AM from Jen Deegan: I think the PIs are planning to get it finalized before the meeting this time.
10/07/2008 09:52:08 AM from Jen Deegan: because we got in a muddle last time
10/07/2008 09:52:08 AM from Amina Abdulla: I'll be working on a video to demo OE for the Ontology Content Development section
10/07/2008 09:52:16 AM from Tanya: That would be excellent.
10/07/2008 09:52:19 AM from Amina Abdulla: Any suggestions for that demo would be appreciated
10/07/2008 09:52:34 AM from Jen Deegan: we can do live demos rather than video maybe?
10/07/2008 09:52:37 AM from Jen Deegan: we often do
10/07/2008 09:53:04 AM from Amina Abdulla: Well it would be easier to explain some of the complex tasks with a video
10/07/2008 09:53:05 AM from Jen Deegan: I think the new layout would be great to demo
10/07/2008 09:53:08 AM from midori: yes, that would allow you to repeat things or go into more depth if there are questions.
10/07/2008 09:53:37 AM from midori: Jen - you mean the docking framework? I thought that had been shown before ...
10/07/2008 09:53:38 AM from Nomi Harris: what new layout?
10/07/2008 09:53:49 AM from Amina Abdulla: ok yeah - thats a great point - video sort of inhibits that
10/07/2008 09:53:57 AM from Jen Deegan: yes it has I suppose. I was just thinking that it's new for this release.
10/07/2008 09:54:02 AM from Jen Deegan: they have seen it before though.
10/07/2008 09:54:09 AM from Jen Deegan: might be good to demo the compound search
10/07/2008 09:54:17 AM from Jen Deegan: it is very different from 1.101
10/07/2008 09:54:39 AM from Karen: different, but way easier: )
10/07/2008 09:54:43 AM from Jen Deegan: yes
10/07/2008 09:55:05 AM from Jen Deegan: are we just talking about new features since last meeting?
10/07/2008 09:55:16 AM from Jen Deegan: it's hardder to think of that than new features since 1.101
10/07/2008 09:55:20 AM from Amina Abdulla: I was a little concerned about OE freezing while dealing with large ontologies thats why I suggested the video
10/07/2008 09:55:37 AM from midori: You could use SO instead of GO to demo ...
10/07/2008 09:55:39 AM from Nomi Harris: Has it been freezing on your lately?
10/07/2008 09:55:41 AM from Jen Deegan: it should be fine
10/07/2008 09:55:47 AM from Nomi Harris: (you, I mean, not your)
10/07/2008 09:55:54 AM from midori: It's been much better for me since b49
10/07/2008 09:56:01 AM from Jen Deegan: it never freezes on me. Is it bug reasoner stuff you are doing?
10/07/2008 09:56:11 AM from Jen Deegan: big I mean
10/07/2008 09:56:49 AM from Amina Abdulla: Yeah - I was watching chris work on this xp ontology yest and there a notic able lag ipdating the OTE eveytime
10/07/2008 09:57:08 AM from Amina Abdulla: updating*
10/07/2008 09:57:12 AM from Jen Deegan: If you want me to drive while you stand up and talk then I would be happy to do that.
10/07/2008 09:57:31 AM from midori: The reasoner does slow it down quite a bit ... (OE1 is at least as bad)
10/07/2008 09:57:49 AM from Jen Deegan: yes I am almost always working without the reasoner.
10/07/2008 09:57:55 AM from midori: same here
10/07/2008 09:58:36 AM from Amina Abdulla: Well Chris wrote a new Rule based Reasoner
10/07/2008 09:59:17 AM from Amina Abdulla: That will be mentioned in the demo too
10/07/2008 09:59:25 AM from Jen Deegan: great
10/07/2008 09:59:49 AM from Jen Deegan: I would be interested to hear more about the reasoner.
10/07/2008 09:59:49 AM from Amina Abdulla: Will anyone else be using OE for demos in other sections?
10/07/2008 10:00:05 AM from Jen Deegan: yes, quite possibly, but only off the cuff.
10/07/2008 10:00:08 AM from Jen Deegan: for me anyway
10/07/2008 10:00:26 AM from midori: probably not live, but there will be lots of screenshots
10/07/2008 10:00:55 AM from Amina Abdulla: ok - was that the reason why you posted the increasing font size bug for the search editor Jen
10/07/2008 10:01:29 AM from Jen Deegan: I really very often do things on screen for groups, so I thought I'd better mentiont hat bug before it was needed.
10/07/2008 10:01:41 AM from Amina Abdulla: That worked really well on my mac increasing font size up to 20
10/07/2008 10:01:50 AM from Amina Abdulla: ok
10/07/2008 10:01:54 AM from Jen Deegan: yes it's good isn't it?
10/07/2008 10:02:29 AM from Amina Abdulla: Yeah - the search results table needs to be fixed to adjust according to content though
10/07/2008 10:02:41 AM from Jen Deegan: Yes that would be great, thanks.
10/07/2008 10:03:32 AM from Amina Abdulla: Midori - would you like to give us the parent editor demo now
10/07/2008 10:03:51 AM from midori: OK
10/07/2008 10:04:41 AM from midori: Because I can't do both chat and demo, first I'll plug some comments in here so you'll have some idea what you're watching ...
10/07/2008 10:04:52 AM from midori: First I'll just show what the Parent Editor displays. Things to note:
10/07/2008 10:04:59 AM from midori: - there's a pulldown menu of relationship types
10/07/2008 10:05:15 AM from midori: - the trash can icon deletes a relationship; it's greyed out if a term only has one parent (use the OTE to make terms obsolete)
10/07/2008 10:05:24 AM from midori: - if you click on the button with the parent name and ID, it selects the parent term.
10/07/2008 10:05:56 AM from midori: Then I'll create a new term, and use the Parent Editor to add a second parent. I'll do one that just adds a parent, and then another one where I change a relationship type.
10/07/2008 10:06:07 AM from midori: Then I'll clone an existing term, and adjust its parentage (both adding and deleting parents).
10/07/2008 10:06:30 AM from midori: I'll also show the namespace pulldown and the range button, but I won't do much with either because we don't use them in GO at present.
10/07/2008 10:06:36 AM from midori: OK, here I go ...
10/07/2008 10:15:44 AM from Jen Deegan: I have a feature request idea for OBO-Edit 3. There could be a 'new parent' button in the parent editor, that makes a text box. Then you type some part of the name of the term you want and it autocompletes to the full name. The you commit.
10/07/2008 10:16:16 AM from melissaH: ooh, I like it
10/07/2008 10:16:35 AM from Jen Deegan: I can see why Midori likes this tool.:-)
10/07/2008 10:17:13 AM from melissaH: I too use it a lot
10/07/2008 10:17:29 AM from midori: OK ... did that work?
10/07/2008 10:17:35 AM from Jen Deegan: yes, great
10/07/2008 10:17:38 AM from Jen Deegan: thanks.
10/07/2008 10:17:45 AM from midori: yay .... and whew!
10/07/2008 10:17:46 AM from Amina Abdulla: Yeah thanks midori
10/07/2008 10:17:50 AM from Nomi Harris: It does seem very useful.
10/07/2008 10:18:05 AM from midori: I was wishing we were on Skype so I could narrate. Glad it worked anyway.
10/07/2008 10:18:17 AM from Amina Abdulla: that would've helped
10/07/2008 10:18:18 AM from midori: I am a Parent Editor Fan Club founding member ;)
10/07/2008 10:18:22 AM from Jen Deegan: I can see that it must save a lot of searching around, especially when you want to delete relationships.
10/07/2008 10:18:32 AM from Karen: Your pre-explanation helped a lot to know what I was seeing.
10/07/2008 10:18:41 AM from midori: That's exactly what made me try it out in the first place.
10/07/2008 10:18:49 AM from Jen Deegan: What do you think of my feature request idea Midori?
10/07/2008 10:18:52 AM from Tanya: pretty cool
10/07/2008 10:19:32 AM from midori: Re feature: I wouldn't delay OE2.0 release fo rit, but it would be most cool for, say 2.1.
10/07/2008 10:19:51 AM from Jen Deegan: great, I'll request that for the next release then.
10/07/2008 10:20:50 AM from midori: If we have to wait for OE3, I'll get by. Let's get OE2.0 out, and then do feature priorities ofr 2.1 vs. 3.0
10/07/2008 10:20:56 AM from midori: (sorry for typos ...)
10/07/2008 10:21:05 AM from Jen Deegan: good plan
10/07/2008 10:21:53 AM from Amina Abdulla: Any other items for today?
10/07/2008 10:22:00 AM from Chris Mungall: note that 'show implied links' appears to be broken when the reasoner is on
10/07/2008 10:22:15 AM from Jen Deegan: None from me.
10/07/2008 10:22:16 AM from Chris Mungall: (in the parent editor)
10/07/2008 10:22:33 AM from Nomi Harris: I have to go now.
10/07/2008 10:22:38 AM from Jen Deegan: Bye Nomi.
10/07/2008 10:22:39 AM from Nomi Harris: Bye!
10/07/2008 10:22:43 AM from midori: bye nomi
10/07/2008 10:23:00 AM from Amina Abdulla: I'll look into that
10/07/2008 10:23:02 AM from midori: Chris - is that one of the things we put in the tracker after you visited us?
10/07/2008 10:23:14 AM from Jen Deegan: no I didn't do it
10/07/2008 10:23:23 AM from Jen Deegan: I mean it wasn't one that was in the minutes
10/07/2008 10:23:49 AM from midori: OK, I must be thinking of something else -- there were a couple of parent editor items. Neve rmind ...
10/07/2008 10:24:03 AM from Chris Mungall: yes, I didn't notice until now
10/07/2008 10:24:07 AM from Jen Deegan: There were oddles
10/07/2008 10:24:20 AM from Jen Deegan: oodles I mean
10/07/2008 10:24:25 AM from midori: I like oddles ...
10/07/2008 10:24:32 AM from Jen Deegan: me too: -)
10/07/2008 10:24:33 AM from midori: seems fitting somehow
10/07/2008 10:24:41 AM from Jen Deegan: sounds like a way to cook eggs
10/07/2008 10:24:47 AM from Amina Abdulla: oodles that were odd
10/07/2008 10:24:53 AM from Jen Deegan: :-)
10/07/2008 10:25:10 AM from Amina Abdulla: Alright everyone - thanks for coming
10/07/2008 10:25:21 AM from Amina Abdulla: should we end the meeting?
10/07/2008 10:25:24 AM from Jen Deegan: Thanks for the meeting Amina.
10/07/2008 10:25:31 AM from midori: Next time I see any of you will be in Montreal ...
10/07/2008 10:25:43 AM from Jen Deegan: Can you email me the SF links? I have to go and do something about food for the masses.
10/07/2008 10:25:55 AM from Amina Abdulla: Sure Jen
10/07/2008 10:25:57 AM from Jen Deegan: See you then Midori.
10/07/2008 10:26:00 AM from Jen Deegan: thanks Amina.
10/07/2008 10:26:01 AM from Amina Abdulla: Midori - your not here next week?
10/07/2008 10:26:05 AM from melissaH: bye everyone
10/07/2008 10:26:21 AM from Amina Abdulla: bye Melissa
10/07/2008 10:26:27 AM from midori: correct -- I'm off tomorrow on a crazy trip that includes the GO meeting.
10/07/2008 10:26:40 AM from Amina Abdulla: sounds like fun
10/07/2008 10:26:41 AM from Tanya: bye!
10/07/2008 10:26:43 AM from Karen: bye
10/07/2008 10:26:47 AM from Jen Deegan: bye
10/07/2008 10:26:50 AM from midori: bye
10/07/2008 10:27:02 AM from Amina Abdulla: bye everyone