Ontology meeting 2011-11-16: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Discussion notes I: TAXON RESTRICTION FILE== | ==Discussion notes I: TAXON RESTRICTION FILE== | ||
* | * What checks are taxon_go_triggers file subject to? Currently, for example, it's allowing conflicting taxon restrictions: | ||
[[File:Screen_shot_2011-11-04_at_10.46.10.png]] | [[File:Screen_shot_2011-11-04_at_10.46.10.png]] |
Revision as of 07:21, 15 November 2011
Report
Discussion notes
Discussion notes I: TAXON RESTRICTION FILE
- What checks are taxon_go_triggers file subject to? Currently, for example, it's allowing conflicting taxon restrictions:
- 'cyanelle ribonuclease P complex ; GO:0030679' has restrictions to both Viridiplantae (green plants) and Glaucocystophyceae (algae)'. Cyanelles are plastids of Glaucocystophyte algae, so the plant restriction is wrong (NB: I've now fixed the cyanelle cases in the taxon file because they were causing problems for SIB curators, but there's probably other examples).
- There's lots of redundant taxon restrictions in the file. Although this isn't wrong, it does clutter up the taxon restriction display in QuickGO, and makes maintaining taxon_go_triggers more time-consuming.
- Can taxon_go_triggers be more integrated into the main obo file: what checks are in place to check the two are in-sync (e.g. for merged/obsoleted terms).
Task List