Ontology meeting 2012-01-04

From GO Wiki
Revision as of 14:02, 3 January 2012 by Cjm (talk | contribs) (→‎Discussion notes II: UPDATE ON PROTEGE WORKSHOP)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Report

Discussion notes


Discussion notes I: Additional Relationships in Cellular Component

  • Can we add new relationships from the Relation ontology to GO cellular component? including:

derives_from

  • E.g. acroblast derives_from Golgi apparatus ; GO:0005794 (may be able to be more specific)
  • E.g. mitochondrial derivative ; GO:0016007 derives_from mitochondrion ; GO:0005739
  • E.g. late endosome ; GO:0005770 derives_from early endosome ; GO:0005769

Also: Nebenkerns?

The current is_a relationships don't show this as well as we'd like


adjacent_to

  • E.g. nuclear membrane ; GO:0031965 adjacent_to cytoplasm ; GO:0005737

See [1]

Discussion notes II: UPDATE ON PROTEGE WORKSHOP

  • Wiki here: Protege_workshop
    • The agenda is still fluid (don't be scared if there appears to be a lot of stuff, some of this will be trimmed down)

Discussion notes III: TERM GENIE 1

  • We're all liking TG1.... thanks Heiko! One issue though, is that it won't allow 'regulation of x signaling pathway' terms, because these have a 'regulation of cellular process', and hence 'regulation of biological process' parent. I can see why this check is obviously in place, but is there a way round it?

Discussion notes IV:Disjoints


Task List