Difference between revisions of "Ontology meeting 2012-09-27"
|Line 10:||Line 10:|
Revision as of 02:06, 26 September 2012
Follow-up on ChEBI paper
transmembrane transport/ers vs. transport/ers
Following on from the annotation call on Tues, at which there was a lot of confusion. I explained what we meant by 'actively_involved_in' v/s 'involved_in', and that you can be actively involved in something directly or indirectly, as described in Chris's handy figure:
as well as the difference between being actively and passively involved in a process. I don't really think I got the message across, so we need to figure out a better way of explaining this - perhaps with a simplfied version of the above? But the consensus seemed to be that no-one had been annotating the passive participants of a process, so I think we can probably use 'actively_involved_in' for all process annotations.