Ontology meeting 2012-09-27: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[File:Capable of.pdf|200px|thumb|left|capable_of_figure]] | [[File:Capable of.pdf|200px|thumb|left|capable_of_figure]] | ||
as well as the difference between being actively and passively involved in a process. I don't really think I got the message across, so we need to figure out a better way of explaining this - perhaps with a simplfied version of the above? But the consensus seemed to be that no-one had been annotating the passive participants of a process, so I think we can probably use 'actively_involved_in' for all process annotations. |
Revision as of 05:06, 26 September 2012
MINUTES: David
ATTENDEES:
Follow-up on ChEBI paper
transmembrane transport/ers vs. transport/ers
Annotation relationships
Following on from the annotation call on Tues, at which there was a lot of confusion. I explained what we meant by 'actively_involved_in' v/s 'involved_in', and that you can be actively involved in something directly or indirectly, as described in Chris's handy figure:
as well as the difference between being actively and passively involved in a process. I don't really think I got the message across, so we need to figure out a better way of explaining this - perhaps with a simplfied version of the above? But the consensus seemed to be that no-one had been annotating the passive participants of a process, so I think we can probably use 'actively_involved_in' for all process annotations.