|
|
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | [[Category:Ontology]] |
| MINUTES: David | | MINUTES: David |
|
| |
|
Line 5: |
Line 6: |
|
| |
|
| ===Follow-up on ChEBI paper=== | | ===Follow-up on ChEBI paper=== |
| ===transmembrane transport/ers vs. transport/ers===
| |
| ===Annotation relationships===
| |
| Following on from the annotation call on Tues, at which there was a lot of confusion. I explained what we meant by 'actively_involved_in' v/s 'involved_in', and that you can be actively involved in something directly or indirectly, as described in Chris's handy figure:
| |
|
| |
| [[Image: Capable of.jpg|200px]]
| |
|
| |
| as well as the difference between being actively and passively involved in a process. I don't really think I got the message across, so we need to figure out a better way of explaining this - perhaps with a simplfied version of the above? But the consensus seemed to be that no-one had been annotating the passive participants of a process, so I think we can probably use 'actively_involved_in' for all process annotations.
| |