Ontology meeting 2012-10-18: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
===Discussion item: cell-cell junctions=== | ===Discussion item: cell-cell junctions=== | ||
Related to [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3576435&group_id=36855&atid=440764]. Basically, do cell-cell junctions have parts that belong to each of the cells they bridge, or are they part of just one of the cells? | Related to [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3576435&group_id=36855&atid=440764]. Basically, do cell-cell junctions have parts that belong to each of the cells they bridge, or are they part of just one of the cells? | ||
===FOLLOW-UP: asserting/adding tag for inferred links=== | |||
Did Heiko and Chris make any progress getting Stanford to change whatever they had to change? | |||
===FOLLOW-UP: TermGenie template for non-template-able terms=== | ===FOLLOW-UP: TermGenie template for non-template-able terms=== |
Revision as of 06:51, 17 October 2012
MINUTES: Paola
ATTENDEES:
FOLLOW-UP: ChEBI paper
Did the PIs give us any comments?
Discussion item: cell-cell junctions
Related to [1]. Basically, do cell-cell junctions have parts that belong to each of the cells they bridge, or are they part of just one of the cells?
FOLLOW-UP: asserting/adding tag for inferred links
Did Heiko and Chris make any progress getting Stanford to change whatever they had to change?
FOLLOW-UP: TermGenie template for non-template-able terms
See background here: http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Ontology_meeting_2012-10-11
FOLLOW-UP: EC numbers in GO - feasibility study
Carried over from a previous meeting: see Action Items and background here: http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Ontology_meeting_2012-08-08#FOLLOW-UP:_EC_numbers_in_GO_-_feasibility_study