Ontology meeting 2013-05-02: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Minutes: | Minutes: Paola | ||
Attendees: | Attendees: | ||
===Links report including cell types=== | |||
See report at http://build.berkeleybop.org/job/build-go-assert-inferences/22/artifact/assert-report.txt | |||
Was there any discussion on this at the latest CL call? Did Alex provide any feedback outside the call? In general, are there areas of the CL that we should be more 'wary' of? | |||
Revision as of 11:43, 1 May 2013
Minutes: Paola
Attendees:
Links report including cell types
See report at http://build.berkeleybop.org/job/build-go-assert-inferences/22/artifact/assert-report.txt
Was there any discussion on this at the latest CL call? Did Alex provide any feedback outside the call? In general, are there areas of the CL that we should be more 'wary' of?
Templates for regulation of biological qualities
For creating 'regulation of biological trait/quality' terms in TermGenie, do we need to come up with our own mini-ontology of traits?
Stems from SF on sperm motility
Template for receptor activities
Seems we missed these with the chemical xps. They're complicated because mechanism and substrate are often combined, but we should be easily able to make templates for some. The pattern should be the same as binding. Has there been an obol pass on these?