Ontology meeting 2013-11-20: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
===Follow-up: TG TEMPLATE FOR ORGANELLE PART (LUMEN, MEMBRANE)=== | ===Follow-up: TG TEMPLATE FOR ORGANELLE PART (LUMEN, MEMBRANE)=== | ||
See latest discussion: | See latest discussion: | ||
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/panda/jira/browse/GO-185 | |||
Do we have action items/time-frames for this? | |||
===Stemming from question of adding 'luteinizing hormone' in GO (bumped to next week)=== | ===Stemming from question of adding 'luteinizing hormone' in GO (bumped to next week)=== |
Revision as of 08:39, 20 November 2013
Attendees:
Minutes: Tanya
viral cross-products
- We need a better way to represent viral modulation of cell activity. We've used has_particiapnt for now:
[Term] id: GO:0039671 ! evasion by virus of host natural killer cell activity intersection_of: GO:0030683 ! evasion or tolerance by virus of host immune response intersection_of: has_participant CL:0000623 ! natural killer cell
but what we really need to do is say e.g. natural killer cell activity = some biological process has_participant natural killer cell and this process is the regulation of that activity.
Also CL:0000451 ! dendritic cell term
- We've got lots of terms that reference a specific host protein, where the virus modulates one or more functions of that protein e.g.
id: GO:0039548 name: suppression by virus of host IRF3 activity
IRF3 has multiple activities so we wouldn't make an MF term 'IRF3 activity' but we need it somewhere to be able to say the virus modulates it.
- Processes where the differentia is that it involves a virus e.g.
id: GO:0039699 name: viral mRNA cap methylation
has_participant is wrong here...need to say has_participant some protein encoded_by virus
Follow-up: TG TEMPLATE FOR ORGANELLE PART (LUMEN, MEMBRANE)
See latest discussion:
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/panda/jira/browse/GO-185
Do we have action items/time-frames for this?
Stemming from question of adding 'luteinizing hormone' in GO (bumped to next week)
See email thread. Chris says: "GO eds - we will want to switch IDs in the production logical definitions before this, to check the inferences. That's another external ontology imports file - not a big deal. Discuss on thursday?"
Review of template requests in Jira
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/panda/jira/browse/GO-58
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/panda/jira/browse/GO-168
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/panda/jira/browse/GO-177
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/panda/jira/browse/GO-181
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/panda/jira/browse/GO-185
- https://www.ebi.ac.uk/panda/jira/browse/GO-204
New TG template for 'cell migration'?
Note that 'cell chemotaxis' is_a 'cell migration', which is fine based on their definitions. However, both 'cell chemotaxis' and 'cell migration' terms have logical defs based on alters_location_of, e.g.
[Term]
id: GO:0072676 ! lymphocyte migration
intersection_of: GO:0016477 ! cell migration
intersection_of: alters_location_of CL:0000542 ! lymphocyte
Chris says: "It would be good to use a more generic relation, but this depends on the hierarchy being disjoint with other classes using the same relation with a different genus.."
Review proposed fixes to terms for extracellular & extra-organismal region terms - including status of 'other organism'
See: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/panda/jira/browse/GO-216
Moving logical defs into the editors obo file
Testing of OE catalogs
Can all editors test the OE beta?
- Day-to-day editing. OK? Should be unaffected
- Loading combined file: go_write_test.obo in editors directory
- Save filter (advanced save):
- ID starts-with "GO:"
- don't save relations
- Do a diff of the output
Downstream changes
- Reconfigure TG to write all-in-one
- Change pipeline, at first just emulate existing pipeline
Taxon constraints
Action potential
Planning to generate GO process term for action potential if no objections. See: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/panda/jira/browse/GO-215