Ontology meeting 2014-10-09
Attendees:
Minutes:
TG template for 'cell migration'
What is the most appropriate relation to use? See email thread '[go-ontology] cell migration templates'
GO into NCIt
Follow-up on negatively_regulates o part_of/positively_regulates o part_of
We'll go ahead with these, right? Previous discussion copied below:
(Need them for SF 11166)
Chris made a correction. The new diff is attached to his email with subject 'reasoner diff before and after' and dated Sept. 25th. The list is quite long - did anyone get a chance to review it?
We also need to think of this in the context of the call on monday. See: http://go-genkisugi.rhcloud.com/seed/model/gomodel:542732ad0000005 Would NOS inhibitor activity classify under the negative regulation term here? Because that is implied by the classic GAF annotation
AI: Let's give it another week and look at at least sections of it... we will all look at random sections of it and comment/decide at next week's call. If we haven't had time, we'll go ahead all the same.
Discussion on direct/indirect regulation. AI: Some of us will look at examples and figure out suggestions. David H will submit Nikolai's work as an RO ticket, and will check his presentation/slides into svn.