Ontology meeting 2015-06-04
Attendees:
Minutes:
X dependent process & involved in
We have many X-dependent process terms. My initial reading of the names and definitions of these terms was that the X must be upstream, but typically X (implicitly) is treated as part of the process that depends on it, as shown by the large number of cases of term of the form X involved in X dependent process Y. This may be a good thing, but perhaps could be made clearer with some design patterns.
Prompted by: https://sourceforge.net/p/geneontology/ontology-requests/11713/#a397
Follow-up: New TG templates
Where are we with action items on these? Copying over from last week:
If the export templates are ready, we'll test them, then advertise them along with the ones below:
cellular component binding
cellular component organization
import_across_membrane
import_across_plasma_membrane
import_into_cell
We resolved to change the template for 'cellular component organization' to make 'cellular process' the genus (let’s try that, rather than further up the graph, and see what happens). Jira ticket: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/panda/jira/browse/GO-327
Once that's done and tested, we can advertise the 5 templates above.
As for the export templates, David OS is still working on them. He'll check that he has all the relevant info in one ticket.