Ontology meeting 2020-01-13: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
In [https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/16895 ticket #16895] David writes "I would like to see the definition xrefs reserved for stable publications that support the existence, placement and definition of a term." | In [https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/16895 ticket #16895] David writes "I would like to see the definition xrefs reserved for stable publications that support the existence, placement and definition of a term." | ||
- Should we make this the guideline ? | |||
- How about " <code>[GOC:initials]</code>, <code>[GOC:goc_curators]</code> and <code>[GOC:curators]</code>? We have loads of those. | |||
- How about EC and Rhea ? | |||
- How about InterPro and Pfam ? | |||
==Other Business== | ==Other Business== | ||
Revision as of 09:37, 9 January 2020
Conference Line
See calendar for details
On call:
Agenda
Discussion topics
Guidelines for definition cross references
(Pascale): There are several tickets, including #16895 and #18288 where guidelines are requested to define what is allowed in definition cross references.
In ticket #16895 David writes "I would like to see the definition xrefs reserved for stable publications that support the existence, placement and definition of a term."
- Should we make this the guideline ?
- How about " [GOC:initials], [GOC:goc_curators] and [GOC:curators]? We have loads of those.
- How about EC and Rhea ?
- How about InterPro and Pfam ?
Other Business
https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/projects/1