Difference between revisions of "Ontology meeting 2020-04-06"
(Created page with "= Conference Line = See calendar for details On call: = Agenda = ==Complex Functions== Receptor proposal ==Other Business== https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/...")
(→More on Roles)
|(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)|
|Line 6:||Line 6:|
= Agenda =
= Agenda =
Latest revision as of 09:35, 6 April 2020
See calendar for details
More on Roles
Karen has asked for some discussion.
T: Practical question: new and old curators will have to remember that they need to annotate to ‘xenobiotic %’ and ‘chemical x %’ to get both - how can we make this easier? term-specific annotation guidance in Noctua?
D: One practical solution would be to always use the xenobiotic term when it is appropriate. If you then specify the chemical and the logical refs for the chemicals are in place, we will automatically infer the correct chemical hierarchy. logica defs. The chemical would be annotated in a way the annotation extensions are used now, only in Noctua. So xenobiotic catabolic process and has_primary_input cocaine would also resolve to cocaine catabolic process. No need to double annotate if they logical refs are carefully thought out.