Ontology meeting 2020-04-20: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
(→Agenda) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Viruses in cellular component== | ==Viruses in cellular component== | ||
Currently viruses are listed as a child of cellular component. This causes some problems when defining shapes for GO-CAM. Would it make sense to split them out as their own ontology of anatomical structures? | Currently viruses are listed as a child of cellular component. This causes some problems when defining shapes for GO-CAM. Would it make sense to split them out as their own ontology of anatomical structures? | ||
==Blockers for imports== | |||
At the moment, both the cell and ChEBI are blocked. We need to come up with an SOP for how to handle this. | |||
# We could add terms and not add logical defs, but sometimes the hold up is for a very long time. | |||
# Is there any way we could do an incremental update without other changes? | |||
Latest revision as of 07:59, 20 April 2020
Conference Line
See calendar for details
On call:
Agenda
More on Roles
Karen has asked for some discussion.
Viruses in cellular component
Currently viruses are listed as a child of cellular component. This causes some problems when defining shapes for GO-CAM. Would it make sense to split them out as their own ontology of anatomical structures?
Blockers for imports
At the moment, both the cell and ChEBI are blocked. We need to come up with an SOP for how to handle this.
- We could add terms and not add logical defs, but sometimes the hold up is for a very long time.
- Is there any way we could do an incremental update without other changes?
Other Business
https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/projects/1