Ontology meeting 2020-11-23: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Attendees) |
m (→Agenda) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Main ticket: https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/16972 | Main ticket: https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/16972 | ||
+ many other tickets complain about the un-intuitiveness of has_part | + many other tickets complain about the un-intuitiveness of has_part | ||
* Chris's slides: | |||
* Pascale's slides (summarizing the ticket #16972 and solutions discussed recently) | |||
* List of compound functions: 2 is_a parents (queried by Jim): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1S59bhCydPpseSbD3mRuKVIWaa5VIghwd93zXsItWUKE/edit#gid=218215569 | |||
===Sequence Ontology in go-lego (for Noctua)=== | ===Sequence Ontology in go-lego (for Noctua)=== |
Revision as of 08:28, 30 November 2020
Attendees
- Group members: Pascale, Karen, Harold, Peter, Jim, Tanya, Kimberly, David, Chris, Paul
- Present:
- Regrets:
Agenda
Compound functions
- Came up during the GO-CAM jamboree
Summary of ticket: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1AYJ0cN6XK3j4_enDP0tN8MFBpurFeZ8_w6TH_yMaDKM/edit#slide=id.ga23a5b75aa_0_6
Main ticket: https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/16972 + many other tickets complain about the un-intuitiveness of has_part
- Chris's slides:
- Pascale's slides (summarizing the ticket #16972 and solutions discussed recently)
- List of compound functions: 2 is_a parents (queried by Jim): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1S59bhCydPpseSbD3mRuKVIWaa5VIghwd93zXsItWUKE/edit#gid=218215569
Sequence Ontology in go-lego (for Noctua)
https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/20419
Other Business
https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/projects/1