Revision as of 08:44, 1 March 2021

Attendees

Group members: Pascale, Karen, Harold, Raymond, Peter, Jim, Tanya, Kimberly, David, Chris, Paul, Eric
Present: Pascale, Karen, Harold, Raymond, David, Kimberly, Jim, Chris, Peter,
Regrets:

The ShEx specifications state that MFs can occur in an Anatomical Entity and that GPs or Protein-Containing Complexes can be located in an Anatomical Entity.
Most non-protein-containing complex GO CC terms are a child of Cellular Anatomical Entity which is a subclass of Anatomical Entity.
However, annotations to root Cellular Component result in ShEx violations because root Cellular Component is NOT a subclass of Anatomical Entity.

Discussion

Chris: suggests keeping the current practice and use root Cellular Component and ND.
Action would be to change the ShEX to allow a direct annotation to occurs_is/is active in root Cellular Component

Is this still OK?

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 ==Discussion==
+=== Follow up: Cellular Component, ShEx, and GO-CAMs  -- BLOCKING FOR GO-CAM ===
+* The ShEx specifications state that MFs can occur in an Anatomical Entity and that GPs or Protein-Containing Complexes can be located in an Anatomical Entity.
+* Most non-protein-containing complex GO CC terms are a child of Cellular Anatomical Entity which is a subclass of Anatomical Entity.
+* However, annotations to root Cellular Component result in ShEx violations because root Cellular Component is NOT a subclass of Anatomical Entity.
+'''Discussion'''
+* Chris: suggests keeping the current practice and use root Cellular Component and ND.
+* Action would be to change the ShEX to allow a direct annotation to occurs_is/is active in root Cellular Component
+Is this still OK?
 ==id ranges file==