Ontology meeting 2021-04-05

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Attendees

  • Group members: Pascale, Karen, Harold, Raymond, Peter, Jim, Tanya, Kimberly, David, Chris, Paul, Eric
  • Present:
  • Regrets:


Agenda

ACTION ITEM FROM LAST CALL

  • Filter out Rhea xrefs that are not valid (Jim)


Guidelines for URLs/PURLs

Always use standard URLs.. maybe should use PURLs - see https://github.com/geneontology/go-site/pull/1671


What kinds of MF terms would be appropriate for the multi-drug resistance transporters.

Karen I’ve followed the line of thought that you and Paul suggested at the Jamboree, and would like to see what you guys think before I go any further.

The two relevant tickets are:


  • Decision (March 22): 'broad specificity transporter'


Can protein complexes be is_a cellular anatomical entity?

See ribosome question, https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/21143

Also, if we allow that, how does that impact ShEx? Do we already have cases like this? What default relationship gets added?


  • Decision (March 22):
    • Risobsome is_an organelle
    • polyribosome ?
    • how to make the distinction?


Other Business

https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/projects/1

Retrieved from "https://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php?title=Ontology_meeting_2021-04-05&oldid=79870"