Ontology meeting 2021-12-06: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "* '''Group members:''' Pascale, Karen, Harold, Raymond, Peter, Jim, Tanya, Kimberly, David, Chris, Paul * '''Present: ''' * '''Regrets: ''' =Announcements= =Agenda= ==D...") |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
** Create new top level CHEBI ticket to ask why these 3 compounds (succinate, fumarate, tyrosine) are now being classified as lipids - but the 'functional chain' of lipid is very, very short in these case, this is counter-inituitive; can you explain why this is the case? | ** Create new top level CHEBI ticket to ask why these 3 compounds (succinate, fumarate, tyrosine) are now being classified as lipids - but the 'functional chain' of lipid is very, very short in these case, this is counter-inituitive; can you explain why this is the case? | ||
** Would like clarification on what is a structural derivative | ** Would like clarification on what is a structural derivative | ||
See https://github.com/ebi-chebi/ChEBI/issues/4176#issuecomment-984226590 for response thus far | |||
==Design patterns== | ==Design patterns== |
Revision as of 10:11, 6 December 2021
- Group members: Pascale, Karen, Harold, Raymond, Peter, Jim, Tanya, Kimberly, David, Chris, Paul
- Present:
- Regrets:
Announcements
Agenda
Discussion points
Decision on ChEBI update?
https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/pull/22092 Following up
- Action Item Harold
- Create new top level CHEBI ticket to ask why these 3 compounds (succinate, fumarate, tyrosine) are now being classified as lipids - but the 'functional chain' of lipid is very, very short in these case, this is counter-inituitive; can you explain why this is the case?
- Would like clarification on what is a structural derivative
See https://github.com/ebi-chebi/ChEBI/issues/4176#issuecomment-984226590 for response thus far
Design patterns
Implemented in ontology
Protein-complex organization/assembly/disassembly
Problem with relations used in logical definition https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/22488