Oregon Reference Genomes Meeting: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
# Idea of having a small group go away and review a specific annotation method, meet between them and report back to the group - spending maybe a whole refgen call one on or two issues - which we could aim to completely resolve....do you think we could suggest this as a way of making progress on the consistency concerns we have? just an idea though of something to discuss | # Idea of having a small group go away and review a specific annotation method, meet between them and report back to the group - spending maybe a whole refgen call one on or two issues - which we could aim to completely resolve....do you think we could suggest this as a way of making progress on the consistency concerns we have? just an idea though of something to discuss | ||
=ACTION ITEMS= | |||
#gp2protein file: (Chris, Pascale) to be renamed, and its specifications redefined | |||
Back to [[Consortium_Meetings]] | Back to [[Consortium_Meetings]] |
Revision as of 13:06, 1 April 2009
Back to Consortium_Meetings
Date
April 1, 2009
8:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Venue
University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon
Erb Memorial Union (EMU), Fir Room.
Map of campus, http://map.uoregon.edu/
Map of the EMU, http://emu.uoregon.edu/map_popup.php?x=-50&y=-50&level=main&arrow=SE
Logistics
Please add yourself to the list of registrants on the Meeting Logistics Page
Agenda
Montreal Reference Genome Minutes --Please add agenda items here with your name
Wednesday April 1
8:00-8:30
Coffee
8:30-12:00 (break 10:00-10:30) (4:30-8:00pm BST, break 6:00-6:30pm BST)
Files provided by the different groups (Chris)
- Gp2protein files for consistency
- new GAF files 2.0: using new columns (16 and 17) and meaning of column 12 (type)
Metrics (Mike)
Metric issues
- How should we be measuring progress ? (Judy)
9:30 - 10:30 Review intersection of PPOD and Panther (Kara and Paul)
File:GO EUGENE ppod panther-2.ppt
11:00- 12:30 Review pipeline for adding inferential annotations, includes tracker discussion and annotation examples (Pascale, Kara)
File:GO EUGENE 2009 pipeline1.ppt
12:00-1:00 Lunch - catered at meeting room
1:00-5:00 (Break 2:30-3:00) (9:00pm-1:00am BST, break 10:30-11:00pm BST)
Review Jamboree (Brenley)
Summary Slides & Live Demo
- Action item: should we change to separate GONUTS pages for each ortholog with a common summary page?
To discussion
- Do we continue current method of prioritization for curation?
- UniProt: This month's curation targets is very large for the human set of proteins (37 human proteins to annotate which have a total of ~7500 publications)
- Idea of having a small group go away and review a specific annotation method, meet between them and report back to the group - spending maybe a whole refgen call one on or two issues - which we could aim to completely resolve....do you think we could suggest this as a way of making progress on the consistency concerns we have? just an idea though of something to discuss
ACTION ITEMS
- gp2protein file: (Chris, Pascale) to be renamed, and its specifications redefined
Back to Consortium_Meetings