PAINT-GONUTS integration (Retired): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Display in GONUTS == | == Display in GONUTS == | ||
GONUTS GOsummary extension pulls all gene associations for a gene into the summary table and graph, not just those added from the PAINT GAF. | GONUTS GOsummary extension pulls all gene associations for a gene into the summary table and graph, not just those added from the PAINT GAF. | ||
* Currently IEA is excluded from the summary table and graph. Should other evidence codes be excluded | * Currently IEA is excluded from the summary table and graph. Should other evidence codes be excluded [Mary comment: the refG graphs display only experimental evidence code annotations (EXP, IDA, IPI,IMP, IGI, IEP); IC; and the ISS codes (ISS, ISO, ISA, ISM), which are only displayed (and labeled as "ISS_only") if there is no experimental annotation to the term.] | ||
* ISS to an ancestor node is now displayed as ISS-An in the table | * ISS to an ancestor node is now displayed as ISS-An in the table | ||
* How should qualifiers be handled. From the electronic jamborees, it was important to display NOT in the table. What about other qualifiers? | * How should qualifiers be handled. From the electronic jamborees, it was important to display NOT in the table. What about other qualifiers? |
Revision as of 12:27, 9 September 2009
Back to Reference_Genome_Annotation_Project
For at least some test cases, GONUTS will be used to display PAINT-based annotations so MODs can do quality control.
Importing the PAINT GAF into GONUTS
issues
Display in GONUTS
GONUTS GOsummary extension pulls all gene associations for a gene into the summary table and graph, not just those added from the PAINT GAF.
- Currently IEA is excluded from the summary table and graph. Should other evidence codes be excluded [Mary comment: the refG graphs display only experimental evidence code annotations (EXP, IDA, IPI,IMP, IGI, IEP); IC; and the ISS codes (ISS, ISO, ISA, ISM), which are only displayed (and labeled as "ISS_only") if there is no experimental annotation to the term.]
- ISS to an ancestor node is now displayed as ISS-An in the table
- How should qualifiers be handled. From the electronic jamborees, it was important to display NOT in the table. What about other qualifiers?