PAINT-GONUTS integration (Retired): Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
== Display in GONUTS ==
== Display in GONUTS ==
GONUTS GOsummary extension pulls all gene associations for a gene into the summary table and graph, not just those added from the PAINT GAF.   
GONUTS GOsummary extension pulls all gene associations for a gene into the summary table and graph, not just those added from the PAINT GAF.   
* Currently IEA is excluded from the summary table and graph.  Should other evidence codes be excluded
* Currently IEA is excluded from the summary table and graph.  Should other evidence codes be excluded [Mary comment: the refG graphs display only experimental evidence code annotations (EXP, IDA, IPI,IMP, IGI, IEP); IC; and the ISS codes (ISS, ISO, ISA, ISM), which are only displayed (and labeled as "ISS_only") if there is no experimental annotation to the term.]
* ISS to an ancestor node is now displayed as ISS-An in the table
* ISS to an ancestor node is now displayed as ISS-An in the table
* How should qualifiers be handled.  From the electronic jamborees, it was important to display NOT in the table.  What about other qualifiers?
* How should qualifiers be handled.  From the electronic jamborees, it was important to display NOT in the table.  What about other qualifiers?

Revision as of 12:27, 9 September 2009

Back to Reference_Genome_Annotation_Project

For at least some test cases, GONUTS will be used to display PAINT-based annotations so MODs can do quality control.

Importing the PAINT GAF into GONUTS

issues

Display in GONUTS

GONUTS GOsummary extension pulls all gene associations for a gene into the summary table and graph, not just those added from the PAINT GAF.

  • Currently IEA is excluded from the summary table and graph. Should other evidence codes be excluded [Mary comment: the refG graphs display only experimental evidence code annotations (EXP, IDA, IPI,IMP, IGI, IEP); IC; and the ISS codes (ISS, ISO, ISA, ISM), which are only displayed (and labeled as "ISS_only") if there is no experimental annotation to the term.]
  • ISS to an ancestor node is now displayed as ISS-An in the table
  • How should qualifiers be handled. From the electronic jamborees, it was important to display NOT in the table. What about other qualifiers?