Projects stand up meeting 2021-02-24: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
** For future file testing, what can be automated? Is it worth it? | ** For future file testing, what can be automated? Is it worth it? | ||
** Testing these files raised some issues about how things actually happen wrt the pipeline, e.g. which PAINT files should be compared for input/output; we said we'd switch to GAF2.2 in March, what is happening with GPAD/GPI2.0 in March? If groups only produce a GPI2.0, will that break NEO production? | ** Testing these files raised some issues about how things actually happen wrt the pipeline, e.g. which PAINT files should be compared for input/output; we said we'd switch to GAF2.2 in March, what is happening with GPAD/GPI2.0 in March? If groups only produce a GPI2.0, will that break NEO production? | ||
** Where should our | ** Where should our definitive source of file format documentation live? website? github? | ||
==Pathways2GO manuscript== | ==Pathways2GO manuscript== |
Revision as of 11:08, 24 February 2021
Attendees
- Present:
- Regrets:
- Managers: David, Huaiyu, Kimberly, Pascale, Seth, Suzi, Judy, Paul, Chris
Projects presentation
Template:
- Next deliverables + expected date
- Progress
- Issues / blockers
GAF2.2 migration status
- Kimberly manually testing GAF2.2 input, output WB files as well as GPAD1.2 output WB files
- Still going to double-check Protein2GO output gpad files
- David manually testing files that MGI ingest from all resources (e.g. GOC, UniProt) and subsequent release of MGI GAF2.2 (and also GPAD/GPI2.0)
- Outstanding questions:
- How will GO handle different kinds of errors that may occur with gp2term relations in GAF2.2 files?
- Repair?
- For example, the gp2term relation for a root node annotation is not correct according to our GAF2.2 specifications.
- Remove?
- For example, the gp2term relation for non-protein-containing complex CC terms is 'part of'.
- Repair?
- For future file testing, what can be automated? Is it worth it?
- Testing these files raised some issues about how things actually happen wrt the pipeline, e.g. which PAINT files should be compared for input/output; we said we'd switch to GAF2.2 in March, what is happening with GPAD/GPI2.0 in March? If groups only produce a GPI2.0, will that break NEO production?
- Where should our definitive source of file format documentation live? website? github?
- How will GO handle different kinds of errors that may occur with gp2term relations in GAF2.2 files?
Pathways2GO manuscript
ART1.0/Noctua3.0 plan
Items not discussed at last meeting
Imports
UniProt
- No plan yet
VEuPathDB
- Got in touch this week and would like to start using Noctua
Other resources (Yeast pathways)
History
GPAD export
=
Next sprint
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AIuq8xxgV6bZZHFbXW-s3ln8PdUfZGNUuZcNFX1n7eQ/edit#