Projects stand up meeting 2021-02-24: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 27: Line 27:
** Where else should we announce the file format change? Other forums? Send email again?   
** Where else should we announce the file format change? Other forums? Send email again?   
** Double-check what GAF file format each submitting group is actually submitting (roll this into broader outreach task).
** Double-check what GAF file format each submitting group is actually submitting (roll this into broader outreach task).
** For upgrading GAF2.1, what is happening with root node annotations? The [https://github.com/geneontology/go-site/commit/a904ff8ac15f884e433854a6e9536ff105c21167#diff-3c8e470e693dacedc146a614820b1e3ed0b1e6137800b8bb02b1d255e02e1c37 current upgrade] may not address this.


==Pathways2GO manuscript==
==Pathways2GO manuscript==

Revision as of 11:21, 24 February 2021

Attendees

  • Present:
  • Regrets:
  • Managers: David, Huaiyu, Kimberly, Pascale, Seth, Suzi, Judy, Paul, Chris


Projects presentation

Template:

  • Next deliverables + expected date
  • Progress
  • Issues / blockers

GAF2.2 migration status

  • Kimberly manually testing GAF2.2 input, output WB files as well as GPAD1.2 output WB files
    • Still going to double-check Protein2GO output gpad files
  • David manually testing files that MGI ingest from all resources (e.g. GOC, UniProt) and subsequent release of MGI GAF2.2 (and also GPAD/GPI2.0)
  • Outstanding questions:
    • How will GO handle different kinds of errors that may occur with gp2term relations in GAF2.2 files?
      • Repair?
        • For example, the gp2term relation for a root node annotation is not correct according to our GAF2.2 specifications.
      • Remove?
        • For example, the gp2term relation for non-protein-containing complex CC terms is 'part of'.
    • For future file testing, what can be automated? Is it worth it?
    • Testing these files raised some issues about how things actually happen wrt the pipeline, e.g. which PAINT files should be compared for input/output; we said we'd switch to GAF2.2 in March, what is happening with GPAD/GPI2.0 in March? If groups only produce a GPI2.0, will that break NEO production?
    • Once the documentation is on the website, what should we do with the documentation page in github?
    • Where else should we announce the file format change? Other forums? Send email again?
    • Double-check what GAF file format each submitting group is actually submitting (roll this into broader outreach task).
    • For upgrading GAF2.1, what is happening with root node annotations? The current upgrade may not address this.

Pathways2GO manuscript

ART1.0/Noctua3.0 plan

Items not discussed at last meeting

Imports

UniProt

  • No plan yet

VEuPathDB

  • Got in touch this week and would like to start using Noctua

Other resources (Yeast pathways)

History

GPAD export

=

Next sprint

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AIuq8xxgV6bZZHFbXW-s3ln8PdUfZGNUuZcNFX1n7eQ/edit#