QCQA call 2018-03-20: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 51: Line 51:
etc
etc


Why we should prioritise error fixing
==Why we should prioritise error fixing==
- should be considered critical like fixing bugs in software
* Should be considered critical like fixing bugs in software
- small errors can uncover large issues (fix many problems simultaneously across multiple species)
* Small errors can uncover large issues (fix many problems simultaneously across multiple species)
- prevents future propagation, via PAINt, Ensembl, InterPro mappings
* Prevents future propagation, via PAINt, Ensembl, InterPro mappings




What next?
====What next?====
* Removing redundancy?
* Removing redundancy?
https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1544
 
https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1674
: https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1544
https://github.com/geneontology/amigo/issues/43
: https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1674
https://github.com/geneontology/amigo/issues/295
: https://github.com/geneontology/amigo/issues/43
https://github.com/geneontology/amigo/issues/440
: https://github.com/geneontology/amigo/issues/295
: https://github.com/geneontology/amigo/issues/440
this is related to QC. When the redundancy is removed its easier to spot errors
this is related to QC. When the redundancy is removed its easier to spot errors



Revision as of 06:31, 20 March 2018

Agenda

GOC NYC May 2018

What do we want to report on? Review Cambridge meeting minutes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Y9_Mvqes3op36TPHgfaS7K5FHnGZLgUApghIFYyUKR8/edit


General overview

How GO annotation errors/ inconsistencies/ ommissions can affect analysis

https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1869
  • Encourage people to think about annotation depth ( e.g. cytoplasmic translation)
  • Slim numbers *should* now be relatively stable now (ontology wise), and only affected by annotation increases and decreases ( I might be able to illustrate how errors affect analyses...)

How errors /inconsistencies/ ommissions are identified

  • Rules
i) Blocking of very general high-level GO terms to increase specificity
ii) Taxon constraints (broken?)
iii) Other rules? (Matrix see below)
  • Annotation reviews from ontology development work
examples
identifies
Specificity in the ontology changed to annotation+ extension
general curator error
  • Matrix and slimming (assessing annotation at the organism level)
https://www.slideshare.net/ValerieWood/copy-of-biocuration-2017
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B0YtE_BqXTzQbkdFZmwzV1M2TjA
identifies
general curation errors
ontology fixes (true path violations and missing parent)
Incorrect IEA mappings (SPKW and InterPro)
  • other methods

Summarize major causes of errors/ inconsistencies/ omissions

etc

Why we should prioritise error fixing

  • Should be considered critical like fixing bugs in software
  • Small errors can uncover large issues (fix many problems simultaneously across multiple species)
  • Prevents future propagation, via PAINt, Ensembl, InterPro mappings


What next?

  • Removing redundancy?
https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1544
https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/1674
https://github.com/geneontology/amigo/issues/43
https://github.com/geneontology/amigo/issues/295
https://github.com/geneontology/amigo/issues/440

this is related to QC. When the redundancy is removed its easier to spot errors

  • Really need a way to identify unsupported ISS annotation (there is no alerting when the primary annotation is removed)
  • some terms are really not ideal for annotation transfer

examples transporter specificity (changes frequently between species) drug related terms response to terms add examples....

Rules for protein complexes in 'with' column

https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/15421

Progress on annotation reviews

https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22annotation+review%22


Documentation for annotation reviews

Requesting an annotation review tool?

Review existing pages under Quality Control

http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Category:Quality_Control