RefG Princeton April 12-13 2010: Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
=Propagation Rules/SOP=
=Review 12 families=
=Review 12 families=
http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/GAFs_for_trees-based_annotations
http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/GAFs_for_trees-based_annotations

Revision as of 10:23, 12 April 2010

Propagation Rules/SOP

Review 12 families

http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/GAFs_for_trees-based_annotations

  • ACTION ITEM: We should all look at those 12 families before Monday!

Monday 4/12

Rm 280 10am-1pm.

Review protein families. While reviewing protein families, we can generate a list of propagation rules. We can pick up lunch in our cafe, and work through lunch.

Suggestion: We should probably start with the simpler families, those with fewer annotations (CPS, LONP1/2, and HPRT have 3, 4, and 6, respectively) -Mike

Rm 253 1pm-4pm.

Continue to review protein families. Refine the list of propagation rules after a day's worth of reviewing families.

Tuesday 4/13:

Rm 253 10am-11am

GO annotation camp discussion

Rm 280 11am-1pm

Working lunch to go over misc. discussion items:

  • (Pascale): Should we remove GO:0005515 (protein binding) form the list of terms we see in PAINT?
  • (Mike): Is the PANTHER to P-POD OrthMCL mapping currently working?
  • (Mike): Should we fix the dates in the new GAF files to reflect when the annotations were actually made?
  • (Mike): Could we re-generate the statistics from the GAF files using a script (rather than manually)?
    • Probably easy enough, once we discuss what stats we're interested in capturing (Ed)
  • (Mike): Pascale noticed a problem with the literature linkouts to Wormbase, and I just had some trouble with ZFIN
    • Fixed (Ed)


Rm 253 1pm-4pm

Annotation tracker: Sven, CJM, Seth

  • Current issues/roadblocks
  • Subfamily issue: can we deal?
  • Feedback
  • Can we leverage the annotation reporter to generate the monthly lists in an easier way?

Paper

  • Title: ???
  • Authors: as on this mailing list, and possibly adding CJM, Seth, and Sven if we add a section on the DB and the other GO-top PIs
  • Affiliations: obviously
  • Abstract: Paul?
  • Author Summary: Suzi will take a crack at this
  • Introduction: Pascale&Paul
  • Results: as below, with possible addition of DB section and web interface, although this could be a different paper. Ed and Suzi can write #1, Paul&Mike for #2?
  • Discussion: #3 (Mike & Kara)
  • Materials and Methods: cut and dry, write at the end
  • Acknowledgments: all the curators at the MODs, the grant...
  • References, Figure Legends, Tables: as they fall out from the above.