RefG Princeton April 12-13 2010

From GO Wiki
Revision as of 10:23, 12 April 2010 by Karadolinski (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Propagation Rules/SOP

Review 12 families

http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/GAFs_for_trees-based_annotations

  • ACTION ITEM: We should all look at those 12 families before Monday!

Monday 4/12

Rm 280 10am-1pm.

Review protein families. While reviewing protein families, we can generate a list of propagation rules. We can pick up lunch in our cafe, and work through lunch.

Suggestion: We should probably start with the simpler families, those with fewer annotations (CPS, LONP1/2, and HPRT have 3, 4, and 6, respectively) -Mike

Rm 253 1pm-4pm.

Continue to review protein families. Refine the list of propagation rules after a day's worth of reviewing families.

Tuesday 4/13:

Rm 253 10am-11am

GO annotation camp discussion

Rm 280 11am-1pm

Working lunch to go over misc. discussion items:

  • (Pascale): Should we remove GO:0005515 (protein binding) form the list of terms we see in PAINT?
  • (Mike): Is the PANTHER to P-POD OrthMCL mapping currently working?
  • (Mike): Should we fix the dates in the new GAF files to reflect when the annotations were actually made?
  • (Mike): Could we re-generate the statistics from the GAF files using a script (rather than manually)?
    • Probably easy enough, once we discuss what stats we're interested in capturing (Ed)
  • (Mike): Pascale noticed a problem with the literature linkouts to Wormbase, and I just had some trouble with ZFIN
    • Fixed (Ed)


Rm 253 1pm-4pm

Annotation tracker: Sven, CJM, Seth

  • Current issues/roadblocks
  • Subfamily issue: can we deal?
  • Feedback
  • Can we leverage the annotation reporter to generate the monthly lists in an easier way?

Paper

  • Title: ???
  • Authors: as on this mailing list, and possibly adding CJM, Seth, and Sven if we add a section on the DB and the other GO-top PIs
  • Affiliations: obviously
  • Abstract: Paul?
  • Author Summary: Suzi will take a crack at this
  • Introduction: Pascale&Paul
  • Results: as below, with possible addition of DB section and web interface, although this could be a different paper. Ed and Suzi can write #1, Paul&Mike for #2?
  • Discussion: #3 (Mike & Kara)
  • Materials and Methods: cut and dry, write at the end
  • Acknowledgments: all the curators at the MODs, the grant...
  • References, Figure Legends, Tables: as they fall out from the above.