RefGenProgress 2008-09-10 (Archived): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
m (Pascale moved page RefGenProgress 2008-09-10 to RefGenProgress 2008-09-10 (Archived)) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
** Discussed the possibility of flagging annotations as coming from HTP experiments | ** Discussed the possibility of flagging annotations as coming from HTP experiments | ||
* Schedule a second electronic jamboree (possibly Oct 10) | * Schedule a second electronic jamboree (possibly Oct 10) | ||
* Paper -- making good progress | * Paper -- making good progress | ||
* Sept curation targets were more 'unknowns' from Val | * Sept curation targets were more 'unknowns' from Val | ||
* Not much progress on the annotation tool- something about Seth needing a new machine | * Not much progress on the annotation tool- something about Seth needing a new machine | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Back to [[Reference_Genome_Annotation_Project]] | Back to [[Reference_Genome_Annotation_Project]] | ||
[[Category:Reference Genome]] | |||
[[Category:Archived]] | |||
[[Category:Reports]] |
Latest revision as of 10:50, 16 January 2018
- Sept conference call: RefGenome9Sept08_Phone_Conference
- Discussed "response to " terms
- Discussed the possibility of flagging annotations as coming from HTP experiments
- Schedule a second electronic jamboree (possibly Oct 10)
- Paper -- making good progress
- Sept curation targets were more 'unknowns' from Val
- Not much progress on the annotation tool- something about Seth needing a new machine