RefGenome07Aug07 Phone Conference (Archived): Difference between revisions

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


# Judy, Petra, Karen, DongHui and Kimberley summarize how the different [[Tools for identifying orthologs]] work, algorithm explanations, order of preference and pitfalls in identifying orthologs
# Judy, Petra, Karen, DongHui and Kimberley summarize how the different [[Tools for identifying orthologs]] work, algorithm explanations, order of preference and pitfalls in identifying orthologs
# RG software group and some curators will have a phone conference to discuss the new tool
# Annotation consistency/ quality control: Rex and Pascale will send all the curators on the RG mailing list a list of genes to verify; we'll see how it goes and discuss next time. See example [[ATPAF2]]
# Annotation consistency/ quality control: Rex and Pascale will send all the curators on the RG mailing list a list of genes to verify; we'll see how it goes and discuss next time. See example [[ATPAF2]]
# Continue discussion on [[Outreach: publicizing the project and developing a web presence]] (lead by Susan and Rex)  
# Continue discussion on [[Outreach: publicizing the project and developing a web presence]] (lead by Susan and Rex)  
Line 18: Line 17:


==Reference genome curation tool==
==Reference genome curation tool==
# RG software group and some curators had a phone conference to discuss the new tool
* Sohel has made a new version of the interface
* Sohel has made a new version of the interface
[http://rails-dev.bioinformatics.northwestern.edu:24000/ http://rails-dev.bioinformatics.northwestern.edu:24000/]
[http://rails-dev.bioinformatics.northwestern.edu:24000/ http://rails-dev.bioinformatics.northwestern.edu:24000/]

Revision as of 18:51, 6 August 2007

Review Action Items

Tuesday August 7, 2007, 10 AM CDT (8 AM PDT, 4 PM BST)

  1. Judy, Petra, Karen, DongHui and Kimberley summarize how the different Tools for identifying orthologs work, algorithm explanations, order of preference and pitfalls in identifying orthologs
  2. Annotation consistency/ quality control: Rex and Pascale will send all the curators on the RG mailing list a list of genes to verify; we'll see how it goes and discuss next time. See example ATPAF2
  3. Continue discussion on Outreach: publicizing the project and developing a web presence (lead by Susan and Rex)
  4. Continue discussion on Metrics: breath and depth of annotations (Rex, Judy, Ruth)

Curation QC

  • example: ATPAF2
  • The idea is each curator (or a small group of curators) could generate a page like this when curating a gene; other groups could consult the page when curating the ortholog from their database

Curation Targets

  • We have now shared a spreadsheet where curators can make suggestions for targets

[[1]]

  • RGD (Mary Shimoyama) sent two lists: one of neurological and cardiovascular diseases (692 genes); the other with genes associated with obesity (1222 genes).

Reference genome curation tool

  1. RG software group and some curators had a phone conference to discuss the new tool
  • Sohel has made a new version of the interface

http://rails-dev.bioinformatics.northwestern.edu:24000/

  • Keep sending comments

Reference_Genome_Database_Requirements_Discussion; however since Sohel leaves July 31, development will be delayed

Next meeting

Tuesday Sept 10, 1 PM CDT (11 AM PDT, 7 PM BST)