RefGenome10July07 Phone Conference (Archived): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Agenda= | |||
==Reference Genome meeting update== | |||
===Annotation Statistics | ==Review Action Items== | ||
# ACTION ITEM: Judy, Petra, Karen, DongHui and Kimberley will write a white paper | |||
with an overview of how the different tools work, algorithm explanations, | |||
order of preference and pitfalls in identifying orthologs | |||
# ACTION ITEM: Rex, Pascale, Emily will summarize the strategy used to identifying | |||
target genes and suggest possible improvements | |||
# ACTION ITEM: Rex, Karen, Emily, Susan will write a list of information | |||
needed from curators to measure annotation progress | |||
# ACTION ITEM: Rex, Judy, Ruth will summarize ideas on to how to capture | |||
breath and depth of annotations | |||
# ACTION ITEM: Mary, Sohel, Chris will send a summary of what is being done | |||
by the software group | |||
# ACTION ITEM: Pascale, Donghui will provide a framework for discussing | |||
consistency of annotations across genomes | |||
# ACTION ITEM: Susan and Rex will present suggestions for publicizing the project | |||
and developing a web presence | |||
==Annotation Statistics== | |||
* How many of the human genes have orthologs identified ? | * How many of the human genes have orthologs identified ? | ||
| Line 11: | Line 34: | ||
* How many genes which have papers associated are considered complete/comprehensive ? | * How many genes which have papers associated are considered complete/comprehensive ? | ||
==Issues with target genes== | |||
* pombe (Val): takes a long time to triage papers | * pombe (Val): takes a long time to triage papers | ||
* too many genes | * too many genes | ||
| Line 17: | Line 40: | ||
* pombe/dictyBase: We would like to know when other databases have completed annotation (Judy suggestion: Change from 'complete' to 'comprehensive') | * pombe/dictyBase: We would like to know when other databases have completed annotation (Judy suggestion: Change from 'complete' to 'comprehensive') | ||
==Software status?== | |||
Revision as of 14:40, 3 July 2007
Agenda
Reference Genome meeting update
Review Action Items
- ACTION ITEM: Judy, Petra, Karen, DongHui and Kimberley will write a white paper
with an overview of how the different tools work, algorithm explanations, order of preference and pitfalls in identifying orthologs
- ACTION ITEM: Rex, Pascale, Emily will summarize the strategy used to identifying
target genes and suggest possible improvements
- ACTION ITEM: Rex, Karen, Emily, Susan will write a list of information
needed from curators to measure annotation progress
- ACTION ITEM: Rex, Judy, Ruth will summarize ideas on to how to capture
breath and depth of annotations
- ACTION ITEM: Mary, Sohel, Chris will send a summary of what is being done
by the software group
- ACTION ITEM: Pascale, Donghui will provide a framework for discussing
consistency of annotations across genomes
- ACTION ITEM: Susan and Rex will present suggestions for publicizing the project
and developing a web presence
Annotation Statistics
- How many of the human genes have orthologs identified ?
- How many of these have papers associated (are published genes) ?
- How many papers associated in total ?
- How many papers have been considered for GO curation ?
- How many papers provided GO terms ?
- How many genes which have papers associated are considered complete/comprehensive ?
Issues with target genes
- pombe (Val): takes a long time to triage papers
- too many genes
- not enough coordination between annotation efforts
- pombe/dictyBase: We would like to know when other databases have completed annotation (Judy suggestion: Change from 'complete' to 'comprehensive')