WPWG-20080226-transcript

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

8:35 AM

sjcarbon has joined the channel

rama: hello

sjcarbon: sorry i'm late

sjcarbon: are we waiting for amelia and mary?

sjcarbon: chris won't be joining us today

ben: mary n chris

gwg: I'm here

ben: oh

sjcarbon: ah yes, hello!

8:40 AM

sjcarbon: no mary on skype, maybe we should just go on...

sjcarbon: first action item:

sjcarbon: compare different displays for the term qualifier.

sjcarbon: people seemed to be hapy with #2?

rama: i was happy with #2. Did everyone take a look?

ben: i already voted

gwg: Did anyone see the email I sent out after that, about sorting options?

eurie: i prefer 2 over 1

ben: sorting or just qualifier display options

ben: I think it should just be consistant with other settings (not sure what those are)

8:45 AM

gwg: I'll make it sticky - I think it makes more sense to view the 'not' assocs separately throughout a session

rama: <a href="http://www.ebi.ac.uk/%7eaji/demo2.html">http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~aji/demo2.html

gwg: also - any prefs on how to set the option? A toggle saying 'view NOT associations separately' (or something similar), or do people want clickable column headings, or some other option?

rama: Gwg, where is the option to set the preference to display the Not annotations separately (sorry i am little slow)

gwg: I haven't put it in that display - I wanted some input before implementing it

rama: ho I see

8:50 AM

rama: I think the other options we have currently are not sticky..am i right?

gwg: some options are sticky, like the sort in the term / gp search, and whether you view the compact or the full representation of the tree

gwg: others aren't

rama: and what would the default be?

gwg: default would be to have the NOTs intermingled with the other assocs

ben: no comment

rama: okay. please send some mockups for comments and we will take it from there. is that okay?

gwg: yup

8:55 AM

gwg: next item?

sjcarbon: lemme see...

sjcarbon: contact GO list...done

sjcarbon: next item: ask chris about splitting up gp count by qualifier

gwg: we did that, and it was going to prove nasty

sjcarbon: right.

sjcarbon: i've forgotten why we were going to ask though.

gwg: people wanted GP counts for the various association qualifiers, but it was going to be a pain to calculate

sjcarbon: ok.

sjcarbon: next item:

sjcarbon: Put decision tree onto future agendas.

sjcarbon: we can take this off now, right?

gwg: what is this decision tree?

gwg: If it's the ev code one, it was done ages ago

sjcarbon: off it goes.

gwg: well, putting it on the website was done, putting it on the agenda has also been done now

sjcarbon: i think that does it for our action items.

9:00 AM

rama: about this release...

rama: we should limit it to the feature that Amelia is implementing now and move it forward

sjcarbon: everything is ready except the qualifiers.

sjcarbon: tag and go with this one feature.

rama: okay. sounds good.

gwg: sorry, it's partly my fault because I've been off work and having days off and so on... tut tut!

sjcarbon: anything else webby to discuss? if not, i have one more thing.

ben: time line amelia?  just trying to plan my week?

rama: no problem..

gwg: Do I need to do mock ups?

rama: no, you can put it on toy and let us know.

gwg: End of the week at the latest then

sjcarbon: Anything more webby?

9:05 AM

gwg: nope

sjcarbon: i've got a first pass of mary's graphs working off of the database.

gwg: excellent

sjcarbon: it needs to be made more efficient (so if you all pounce on it right now, it will smoke my workstation), but all of the basics are in there:

sjcarbon: <a href="http://berkeleybop.org/alpha/amigo/amigo">http://berkeleybop.org/alpha/amigo/amigo

rama: awesome

sjcarbon: right now, it is working on the wrong database,

sjcarbon: but i'll try to fix that

sjcarbon: i'll start soliciting input soon, but you can start taking a look at it as i progress.

rama: sounds good

sjcarbon: right now, it needs firefox or opera. a line of code will add safari. more to come.

pascale: great!

sjcarbon: i'll post to the list this week with more information.

sjcarbon: and instructions.

rama: great

sjcarbon: and what data to add, etc.

9:10 AM

sjcarbon: i'm good. anybody else?

rama: nope

sjcarbon: i think i'm having logging problems, could someone else send me the log.

sjcarbon: ?

rama: you mean the transcript?

sjcarbon: yes. please.

rama: i can

sjcarbon: thank you!

sjcarbon: if there's nothing else...?