Ontology meeting 2022-03-21

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Group members: Pascale, Karen, Harold, Raymond, Peter, Jim, Tanya, Kimberly, David, Chris, Paul
  • Present:
  • Regrets:


Discussion points

Moving the Google drive to a 'Shared' drive

See details here: https://github.com/geneontology/go-site/issues/1813

Please move the files you own:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1CO_NPiOVIlQ51KlyajRzMEmsp2mQ7zqH : Harold
  • Remember to save you files in the new Shared Gene Ontology Drive

Raymond open PRs

Missing inferences from external ontologies

see Missing part-of relation for: GO:0060658 nipple morphogenesis; should we request changes from upstream ontologies?

  • To rediscuss next week when Jim is here


Membrane reorganization proposal

https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/23029

Follow up on points from previous meetings

Transport or maintains localization relation

https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/22721

  • Pascale changed relations in the ontology
  • Next: Add property chains for 'has primary input' and 'has primary output' that mirror existing chain for 'has input'? ?

Schedule a jamboree

When? Topic?

  • BP refactor
  • Roles

Following up on previous items

  • ChEBI: Chris, Paul: Make a list of requests for ChEBI - including requesting 'developer' versions of ChEBI so we can test it ahead of releases
  • Design patterns

New taxon constraints

Property range violations

  • Looks like an issue in GO, where 'cavity development' may be redundant with the equivalent 'tube' terms, or the 'tube terms are missing'?

ACTIONS: Review 'cavity terms



Sinus terms: Not sure why only 'pronephric sinus development' is causing problems others do have LDs: Chris: only 'pronephric sinus development' describes a sinus; other describe valves, venosus

Protein-complex organization/assembly/disassembly

Problem with relations used in logical definition https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/22488

RO has been changed, so that the logical issue is fixed; however do we want to use 'results in assembly of' or 'has output' for protein-containing complex assembly? This decision impacts the relations used in GO-CAM and extensions, since we aim to align them.

Other Business

https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/projects/1