SGD December 2012
Saccharomyces Genome Database Summary, 2012
Rama Balakrishnan, Gail Binkley, J. Michael Cherry, Maria Costanzo, Selina Dwight, Stacia Engel, Dianna Fisk, Ben Hitz, Stuart Miyasato, Rob Nash, Marek Skrzypek, Shuai Weng, Edith Wong
[please include FTEs working on GOC tasks designating as well how many FTEs funding by GOC NIHGRI grant]
|GO Aspect||Number of Annotations Added||Number of genes updated||Number of publications used|
Note that these numbers count manually curated and high-throughput annotations only for ORFs that are Verified or Uncharacterized (Dubious ORFs are excluded), for RNA genes (ncRNA, rRNA, snRNA, snoRNA, or tRNA) and for genes encoded within transposable elements. It should also be noted these annotations may include both new annotations and updated annotations which replaced older ones.
State of GO annotations Genome wide
|Type||Counts as of December 18, 2012|
|GP with Any Annotation||6382|
|GPs with Manual annotation||6382|
|GP with Experimental and Computational Evidence||5701|
|GP with Computational Evidence||5701|
|GP with Curator Evidence (TAS, NAS, IC)||1416|
|GP with No Data (ND) in MF||1971|
|GP with No Data (ND) in BP||1188|
|GP with No Data (ND) in CC||731|
|Total Annotations with Manual curation||43223|
|Total Annotations with Computational Evidence||40061|
|Annotations with Curator Evidence (TAS, NAS, IC)||2936|
|Annotations with No Data (ND)||3890|
Methods and strategies for annotation (please note % effort on literature curation vs. computational annotation methods)
a. Literature curation: 100% of SGD’s effort is dedicated to manual curation based on the published literature for budding yeast gene and their products.
b. Computational annotation strategies: SGD does not employ automated methods to assign annotations, rather we absorb the computationally predicted annotations made by the UniProtKB GOA project for S. cerevisiae. The IEA annotations are loaded into the SGD database from the GOA gene association file after each release. All these annotations are included in the gene_association.sgd file, which represents a significant expansion of the types of evidence codes and data sources that are provided by SGD. Note: The computationally predicted annotations generated by the integrated bioinformatic analysis of high-throughput data from the Roth and Troyanskaya labs (Tian et. al., 2008, Huttenhower and Troyanskaya, 2008) were removed from SGD because those predictions (annotations) were not refreshed/updated.
c. Priorities for annotation: The highest priority is to capture annotations where new information is available for an Uncharacterized gene product. These papers are identified during the literature triage process. In addition, we update older annotations. SGD captures the date when the annotations for a gene were reviewed. Using this date reviewed, older annotations are checked for consistency with the current literature.
d. SGD has incorporated Phylogeny based annotations made by PAINT. These annotations are now part of SGD's gene_association.sgd file
e. SGD curators recently concluded a large comparison study of manual vs computationally predicted annotations and are using the results from this to study to prioritize and come up with curation strategies.
f. SGD curators are routinely creating terms via the new TermGenie interface to speed up the process of annotation.
Presentations and Publications
- Papers with substantial GO content
- PMID:22434836 CvManGO, a method for leveraging computational predictions to improve literature-based Gene Ontology annotations. Park J, Costanzo MC, Balakrishnan R, Cherry JM, Hong EL. Database (Oxford). 2012 Mar 20;2012:bas001. doi: 10.1093/database/bas001.
- PMID: 23242164 A gene ontology inferred from molecular networks. Dutkowski J, Kramer M, Surma MA, Balakrishnan R, Cherry JM, Krogan NJ, Ideker T.Nat Biotechnol. 2012 Dec 16.
A. Annotation Outreach
- R. Balakrishnan is a manager for the Annotation Advocacy working group
- R. Balakrishnan is part of the rotation that answers user email from gohelp.
- SGD curators participate in Annotation conference calls and curation Jamboree.
- R. Balakrishnan is part of a working group involved in the redesign of the GOC website.
- R. Balakrishnan attended the Blast2GO course held at UCDavis (July 2012).
- R. Balakrishnan attended the PAINT workshop held at Stanford University (December 2012).
- SGD is working towards transitioning to use GOA's protein2GO tool for curating GO
- Kalpana Karra has been working on building GOMine which is an implementation of InterMine. GOMine (http://gomine.geneontology.org) should serve as a fast search and retrieval tool for GO data without having to know sql or the database table structure. This tool should be ready for public consumption in early 2013.
- SGD continues to serve as the Production server for the GO Database and for the AmiGO web application.
- B. Hitz, S. Miyasato, G. Binkley are on the go-software mailing list