14 JUNE 2011 RefGen Phone Conference (Archived): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
[[GO_annotation_fields_required_for_correct_display]] | [[GO_annotation_fields_required_for_correct_display]] | ||
Tanya: I would prefer that the date is essential and the assigned by is recommended (rather than essential). I think it's more important to know how old an annotation is than to know who made it. (will remove this after discussion). | |||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 11:18, 14 June 2011
Present
- Pascale dictyBase
- Stan RGD
- Emily and GOA
- Chris BBOP
- Judy MGI
- Kimberly Wormbase
- Ruth BHF-UCL
- Varsha BHF-UCL
- Dmitry MGI
- Bren EcoliWiki
- Petra dictyBase
- Mike P-POD
- Li MGI
- Mary MGI
- Donghui TAIR
Progress on Transcription factors annotation: reports on progress, and on use of the new terms
Varsha and Pascale
- MGI has updated most of their TF annotations (BP); due to limited resources, they have not done the MF updates.
- GOA is trying to do the updates but it's taking a lot of resources
Recent additions to QuickGO
Emily
- Beta version of a QuickGO display of the changes made to the GO ontology over time now available both for specific terms, for example for apoptosis as well as for all terms from here
- anyone have suggestions for display improvements?
This provides complementatary information to Amelia's term definition change display
- Display of the occurs_in relationship between cellular component and biological process terms, for instance for GO:0033579 protein galactosylation in endoplasmic reticulum
Call for volunteers to adopt a GO annotation guidance page
Feedback on GO_annotation_fields_required_for_correct_display
GO_annotation_fields_required_for_correct_display
Tanya: I would prefer that the date is essential and the assigned by is recommended (rather than essential). I think it's more important to know how old an annotation is than to know who made it. (will remove this after discussion).