Annotation Conf. Call, June 23, 2015

From GO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Agenda

Ability to add comments to an annotation

We want to be able to capture why a particular experiment/result was not captured as an annotation and make this comment visible to the public. This issue came up during the April curation consistency discussion (mouse paper). I made a github ticket. https://github.com/ebi-uniprot/Protein2GO/issues/1 How should we control this field so we don't write long sentences? Limit it to 140 characters? Other ideas?

obsolete relationships

There are some relationships that were obsoleted (mostly for use with col-16). Not sure how other groups are rehousing these annotations. Instead of a regular consistency exercise is it okay if we go through some of the papers and get your input on how to rehouse those col-16 data?

June Consistency paper

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=23954377

Annotation Summary

Gene Qualifier Term ID # of Annotations Evidence Code Summary 'With' field Summary Extension Summary
Molecular Function Annotations
ATP1A2 contributes_to drug binding GO:0008144 1/3 IPI CHEBI:472805 - ouabain
ATP1B1 contributes_to drug binding GO:0008144 1/3 IPI CHEBI:472805 - ouabain
ATP1A2 contributes_to carbohydrate derivative binding GO:0097367 1/3 IPI CHEBI:472805 - ouabain
ATP1B1 contributes_to carbohydrate derivative binding GO:0097367 1/3 IPI CHEBI:472805 - ouabain
Biological Process Annotations
Biological Process Annotations
Biological Process Annotations
Biological Process Annotations
Biological Process Annotations
Biological Process Annotations
Biological Process Annotations
Biological Process Annotations