Annotation Conf. Call August 13, 2013: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* Should we take results from small scale experiments only? What about HTP experiments? | * Should we take results from small scale experiments only? What about HTP experiments? | ||
* Should we integrate only those interactions that have been reported by more than one paper or one method? | * Should we integrate only those interactions that have been reported by more than one paper or one method? | ||
* Any other issues? | |||
===Col-16 curation=== | ===Col-16 curation=== |
Revision as of 13:06, 12 August 2013
Agenda
Consolidating Protein Binding annotations
Proposal: To consolidate all 'direct' interactions captured by other Interaction pipelines into the respective GAF files.
- We will integrate 'Direct' interactions only
- Of course all interaction databases capture the interacting protein name. We will capture that data in the With column
- When possible, the interaction will be mapped to a granular term instead of retaining the annotation as protein binding (histone binding instead of protein binding). This process will need some work (evidence code, assigned_by etc).
- Should we take results from small scale experiments only? What about HTP experiments?
- Should we integrate only those interactions that have been reported by more than one paper or one method?
- Any other issues?
Col-16 curation
We have some documentation on the GOC website- http://www.geneontology.org/GO.annotation.extension.shtml Now that there are more groups annotating col-16, for consistency sake, we will go through specific examples at future annotation calls. We would like each group to send a paper out ahead of time so we can go through the annotations as a group.